
The new Saturn Astra will be hitting US shores in the 4th quarter of 2007, but an even newer, more global c-platform vehicle will follow for the 2011 model year. The vehicle, which will be built in England, Germany, Sweden, and Poland, will be a truly global small car for the General, which helps GM lower tooling and component costs. Speaking of money, the cost of GM's global small car program is a staggering €3.1 billion ($4.2 billion), which is a big pile of cash.
As crazy a number as $4.2 billion sounds, we're guessing it's much cheaper than two or more like-sized, yet completely independent models that are sold regionally. (Ford Focus, anyone?) On the downside, if the product flops in one market, like the Mondeo/Contour fiasco at Ford, GM will need to be flexible enough to adjust quickly.
[Source: GM]
PRESS RELEASE:
General Motors Europe to Streamline Production of Next-Generation Compact Car
• 3.1 billion Euro total investment in next generation compact cars in Europe
• Assembly planned in Germany, U.K., Sweden and Poland
• Consultation to begin with European and Belgian employee representatives on future production
• Reduction of current Astra production intended at Antwerp, Belgium
Zürich/Antwerp. General Motors Europe today announced its plan to allocate assembly of its next-generation compact-sized cars to four manufacturing plants: Ellesmere Port, U.K.; Bochum, Germany; Trollhättan, Sweden; and Gliwice, Poland.
Production of the new vehicle, due to replace the existing Astra range in early 2010, is expected to involve a 3.1 billion Euro investment and a 30 percent productivity improvement.
There are no plans to allocate compact car production to the Antwerp, Belgium, facility beyond 2010. We are not talking about a plant closure, however, we have to achieve the necessary improvements. No decision has yet been taken on future production but we will work on options for assembly operations at fair volumes together with the European Employee Forum (EEF). GM Europe will continue the process of information and consultation accordingly. GM's Antwerp plant currently employs 4,500 people to produce the 3- and 5-door version, the station wagon and the convertible of the current-generation Opel Astra.
"Product allocations are extraordinarily difficult decisions to take," said Carl-Peter Forster, President of General Motors Europe. "All of our Western European plants have significantly improved over the past few years and are now very close in terms of the various measures of performance, such as cost, productivity and quality. In the end, it is a strategic decision based on a number of factors such as capacity planning, brand and market considerations, as well as ongoing restructuring activities."
Independent from future product allocations, current production at Antwerp is intended to be reduced in 2007, reflecting the normal diminution in demand over the current product's lifecycle. GM Belgium is to begin consultations with employee representatives on staffing at Antwerp, where the elimination of the equivalent of a shift would require 1,400 fewer people.
Mr. Forster said: "I know that today's announcements will be very difficult for our workforce in Antwerp. I want to recognize the contribution and performance of the entire team. We are committed to identifying a socially responsible approach to the intent to reduce the headcount later this summer by the reduction of production volume and to discuss alternatives for a fair transition beyond the end of the decade.
And Forster added: "The automotive business remains very challenging and GM Europe must continue to focus on increasing productivity and efficiency in order to compete effectively. We plan for an annual production of 750,000 units of compact cars in Europe, which is an increase over the 535,000 produced in 2006. Even with an increase, adjusting capacity to meet demand remains a challenge for GM as it is for other automakers worldwide. We would like to start soon the preparation work with our teams in Gliwice, Bochum, Ellesmere Port and Trollhättan for the production of the next generation, which will require reduced assembly time and an increase in productivity of 30 percent."
Of those plants, Bochum currently employs 4,900 people, Ellesmere Port 2,200 people, Trollhättan 2,150 people and Gliwice 2,800 people.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Rene Curry @ Apr 18th 2007 9:51AM
CURRENCY says it need to be made in North America and exported. Not the other way around. Why aren't US manufacturers thinking this way?
By the way, I see this model in China. Looks great!
phoenexius @ Apr 18th 2007 10:08AM
they never mention how much local goverment will give them for retooling factories
Hmm, compact car production in Trollhatten - sounds like a compact Saab to compete with the Volve C30 is in the works
Rick Lyon @ Apr 18th 2007 10:34AM
What is with the last two Saturns that make them look like they are 4x4s awkwardly high off the ground? Is it's the tire well fenders aren't high enough to the side panels or that they are small and fitting them with big tires makes the care look small, tires look big and therefore creates the foot off the ground illusion? I like, kinda, what Saturn is trying, but this and that other new car of theirs just appears awkward in the way it sits on the tires and off the ground.
Will @ Apr 18th 2007 10:55AM
The focus isn't a good comparison because right now Ford Europe and Ford NA are two different companies. It costs ford nearly nothing to make our focus because it hasn't changed in 8 years, hence the lack of C1. 'Course, they then wasted all that money on the '08. C2 (next-gen) focus -will- be global, though we may be stuck with stupid bumpers again.
jg3 @ Apr 18th 2007 10:58AM
That amount doesn't actually sound that bad when you consider that the first Taurus was $3 billion in '80s dollars.
jg3 @ Apr 18th 2007 11:03AM
That amount doesn't actually sound that bad when you consider that the first Taurus was $3 billion in '80s dollars.
jg3 @ Apr 18th 2007 11:04AM
That amount doesn't actually sound that bad when you consider that the first Taurus was $3 billion in '80s dollars.
BVT @ Apr 18th 2007 11:06AM
How much of the €3.1B is for development costs, and how much is for tooling, manufacturing test runs, etc.?
Mike @ Apr 18th 2007 11:30AM
This is a good idea for GM assuming the platform they design is a quality one and easily adaptable into budget and higher market auto's.
@Rick: poor suspension + cheap design = fender gap
Mike @ Apr 18th 2007 11:31AM
This is a good idea for GM assuming the platform they design is a quality one and easily adaptable into budget and higher market auto's.
@Rick: poor suspension + cheap design = fender gap
Mike @ Apr 18th 2007 11:31AM
This is a good idea for GM assuming the platform they design is a quality one and easily adaptable into budget and higher market auto's.
@Rick: poor suspension + cheap design = fender gap
Rastus @ Apr 18th 2007 11:33AM
One word:
Trash!!!
DriftPunch @ Apr 18th 2007 1:43PM
What do you want, a low rider. Maybe we can arrange some tassels hanging from the tops of the interior windows.
I like the extra clearance. It means those of us with steep driveways, large speed bumps, real winters, or light off pavement travel can put the car where we want it to go.
I'm waiting for the Astra (5 door) to come out as I'm considering a commuter car. I am going to take a serious look. If the improvement between the '08 and '11 will be that much, I might wait a while longer. Make mine with 14 inch wheels. I want more rubber between the road and the wheel to buffer the result of what passes for road maintenence around here...
Don @ Apr 18th 2007 2:13PM
Wow, that's a staggering amount of money for one new model...I take it it's popular as all hell get out in Europe?
Jason @ Apr 18th 2007 5:46PM
Nice truck. Geeze, get a clue GM. If we wanted a truck, we'd buy a truck! UGLY turd.
HotRodzNKustoms @ Apr 18th 2007 7:45PM
yeah, I think the Astra is Europe's best selling car...
I don't see what everyone is talking about the lifted truck thing....
If anyone can do a global car right, right now GM is the only one I can see doing a global mass market car, because they seem to have found the formula
RockStoneSteel @ Apr 18th 2007 10:45PM
Beautiful looking car and great concept... BUT...
According to InsideLine, GM cheaped out again and decided to put a torsion beam rear suspension on it rather than independent suspension. It's quite unfortunate that GM compromised in this area. That definitely removes the car from my short list.
Ford did the same cheap thing by using a solid axle on the new Mustang. Also, the "redesigned" Ford Escape still uses rear drum brakes, and in fact doesn't even offer 4 wheel disk brakes. Come on you American manufacturers, this is the 21st century. Time to move from the stone age and compete!