If there's one thing Mr. Bob Lutz can't be accused of, it's backing down. The Car Czar will not only tell you exactly what's on his mind, but he'll also give you a chance to change it, and then tell you what he thinks of that, as well. Tuesday, at his office, Lutz met with the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) -- the same group that recently gave Honda its fourth green award in a row and ranked GM seventh out of eight automakers reviewed -- to give them a chance to show what his company was doing wrong.
Lutz actually asked them -- or rather, challenged them -- to come by. The UCS charged that "with off-the-shelf technology, the automaker could build a minivan that would reduce tailpipe emissions by 40 percent -- and cost just $300 per vehicle." Lutz's response was: "Let them come and see us. If the technology were readily and easily available, what on earth would be our motive for withholding it?"
Lutz met with Dave Friedman, head of the UCS's Clean Vehicle Research program, for two hours. Both parties had agreed not to comment on the meeting, but "loggerheads" was the quoted result. Friedman said "we didn't change any minds," and it was left to GM spokesman Chris Preuss to perhaps say what Lutz wouldn't, remarking "The challenge with environmentalists is that there is a complete lack of business and technical experience from which they can draw conclusions . . . [but] we think the meeting was very worthwhile."
[Source: Detroit News]
BREAKING: Layoffs and executive shuffles at Tesla Motors
SEMA Preview: Dodge bringing Viper-powered Challenger SRT10 Concept
CAR reveals spy shots of McLaren P11 supercar
2010 Chevrolet Camaro priced: LS $22,995, SS $30,995
BREAKING: GM and Chrysler talking about merger
Autoblog Comparo: Moving Mountains - Toyota Landcruiser vs. Hummer H2
First Drive: 2009 Volkswagen Routan
In the Autobog Garage: 2009 Chevy Cobalt SS Turbo
Knight Rider: The Liveblog -- Season 1, Episode 3
In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Mazda RX-8 R3, return of the "hummer"
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Todd @ Apr 18th 2007 3:36PM
So, in other words, GM is saying:
"...we want Toyota to take over as the premiere passenger car maker in the United States. Our lack of innovation, apathy and total disregard for the idea of pride in one's work is what's gonna make us Toyota's little bitch...and we want that."
Owain Ozymandias Buck @ Apr 18th 2007 3:43PM
"The challenge with environmentalists is that there is a complete lack of business and technical experience from which they can draw conclusions."
Hmm. Wow, there's a good way to begin a rational dialog. GM, are you really so dumb as to think that your customers want to hear stuff like that? If you think that's the case with all environmentalists, then you're either pretty clueless or your definition of environmentalist is an emotionally charged, negative stereotype.
Yep, you really know how to win customers. If I was the boss, I would fire somebody in a second for saying something so stupid.
jg @ Apr 18th 2007 3:46PM
Like a rock.
synergeist @ Apr 18th 2007 3:51PM
What's in a name, environMENTAList?
John P. @ Apr 18th 2007 4:03PM
The problem is when politics interfere with science (Gore for example, he's terrible at both). I'd say Lutz is being very smart by inviting these people to talk, tell, convince, teach, preach, whatever they do,... in an attempt to find out how and why they come to their findings.
I'll go out on a limb and say I wouldn't be surprised if politics and ignorance is involved throughout the whole thing, on both sides, so it can't hurt talking to them and finding out what it is that makes them tick.
rwdmtparkingonly @ Apr 18th 2007 4:13PM
Speaking of minivans:
2007 Honda Odyssey 2WD Variable Displacement Engine MPG (combined) 21
2007 Chevrolet Uplander FWD E85 FlexFuel
MPG (combined) 21
I drive an Infinti and have no particular love for GM, but the facts are what they are.
Scott @ Apr 18th 2007 4:18PM
#8 - exactly. If this "technology" that the UOCS is talking about is so simple, then why hasn't a company come out with it? Why doesn't a minivan from Honda or Toyota get the mileage they're talking about? The reduced tailpipe emissions? They only target GM (and the other domestics) because of their heavy sales of large trucks and SUV's. If Honda sold as many V8-powered vehicles as GM they'd be the target. When you look closely you'll see that similar vehicles from each manufacturer get very similar mpg ratings, it's only when you do something stupid like look at CAFE ratings or whole fleet ratings that you get this ridiculous bias. A Honda Pilot isn't saving the world, nor is a Toyota Sequoia, so get over it.
bobdobbs @ Apr 18th 2007 4:18PM
"...."I think we will have to build a driveable vehicle" to convince GM the technology works...."
Good luck, genius. Let us know how that works out for ya.
Joel H. @ Apr 18th 2007 4:31PM
GM should call their bluff...
GM should use it as a chance to work with them. Have UCS provide a team to be over seen by GM people. UCS can get a taste of what goes into it and if it is positive GM gets the rights to whatever they find. GM can supply the "off the shelf" components. GM probably has enough things to work on but if it can gain one new organization in this area then it might be worth while.
Neal M @ Apr 18th 2007 4:33PM
Bob Lutz is becoming the Dick Cheney of the GM administration.
I don't want to hear "can't." We're AmeriCANs, not Americants! While that does sound rather stupid, it is true. These kind of "we can't do it because of the status quo" bull is getting really tired and old. If you can't play the current game, CHANGE THE GAME!
Think outside the box guys, not how you can change what's inside. I used to love Bob Lutz (being a Swisser myself), but he just annoys me. Like how they teased us with the G8 and then told us that they can't get the emissions right for RWD cars. How does RWD make a car get worse mileage? MAKE BETTER FREAKING ENGINES FOR GOD'S SAKE!
Aki @ Apr 18th 2007 4:44PM
I actually love Lutz's approach. No-nonesense, strong-headed (even boorish), yet creative. The reason why GM "isn't eco-friendly" is mainly because their more eco-friendly cars don't sell the volume that Toyota or Honda does (Camry, Civic, respectively). GM occupies a different niche, which happens to be gas guzzlers (giant trucks). If Toyota needed to make guzzlers to make money, it'd do so w/o even flinching.
Scotty @ Apr 18th 2007 4:44PM
i am a little concerned about the autoblog bias in the quote. Looking at the full quote reveals that the autoblog snippets are a bit one sided in making GM appear arrogant. PS - Lutz did not even say one of them, the PR guy did.
Tool @ Apr 18th 2007 4:47PM
I have a lot of respect for Bob Lutz. However, when you walk in the door with a swagger, an arrogance and a preconceived notion that substantial improvements to fuel economy will cost $5,000 PNVR, it is a little hard to make any real progress.
I agree that these scientists may be a little naive with little practical business sense, but that is the genius of them. They don't have the same restraints and maybe, just maybe, some of their ideas have merit.
Tool @ Apr 18th 2007 4:51PM
One more thing: With President Shit-for-Brains in office for another 21 months, nothing is going to change until we get a competent President of the U.S. of A.
k @ Apr 18th 2007 4:58PM
Way to go Bob Lutz. Proves these "green" people are just full of BS. Instead of crying like little girls they can go get an engineering or business degree and then create real solutions.
Mike @ Apr 18th 2007 5:02PM
Tool, I bet you are one of those morons who complain that the V-Tech shooting was Bush's fault as well. Go back to sucking the tailpipe of your Vespa and leave the automotive talk to adults.
Tool @ May 29th 2007 9:23PM
Kiss my ass, Mike. I drive a 2007 Porsche 911 Turbo. 480 HP and gets 25 MPG in highway driving.
EnviroBob @ Apr 18th 2007 5:33PM
#11
RWD doesn't make a car get worse mileage, but he fact that RWD vehicles weigh more than similar sized FWD models does. Not only that, but all of the RWD vehicels Lutz was refering to are large vehicles, which means they will use more gas than a car two thirds their size and will thus hurt GM's CAFE avg.
M1EK @ Apr 18th 2007 5:52PM
You guys are just amazing. You wonder why the generation under 40 doesn't touch GM cars unless they have to (rental counter or live in a depressed area like the upper Midwest)?
This was the same exact 'logic' the Big 3 used to claim they couldn't make small cars in the 1970s, remember.
Mike @ Apr 18th 2007 6:04PM
"You wonder why the generation under 40 doesn't touch GM cars unless they have to"
Your head is so far in the clouds it is unbelievable.
I am 25, and NOT midwest or in a depressed area.
GM Products I would own:
Enclave
Acadia
Antara
Aura
Siera
Avalanche
Tahoe
Trailblazer SS
08 Malibu
Impalla SS
Lacross Super
Lucerne Super
CTS
STS
H3 Alpha
Corvette
XLR
Solstice
Sky
Next-gen Vue
9-3
9-5
9-7X
G8
and maybe a few more... but you get my point.