<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/04/jaguar-joins-bmw-in-offering-hd-radio/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/04/jaguar-joins-bmw-in-offering-hd-radio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/04/jaguar-joins-bmw-in-offering-hd-radio/</guid><description><![CDATA[Some would say that the main stumbling block to HD Radio is content. We've heard it all before -- mediocre music pushed by the music industry, far too many commercials, concentrated media ownership creating calculated customer segments and killing unique stations, and inane morning shows have driven the radio industry into the ground, opening up the opportunity for satellite radio and podcasts to emerge. The radio has responded with their "Jack" format, but in my opinion, it's too little too late.<br><br>No matter how good the sound quality, crappy content is still crappy content.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 4th 2007 10:35AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/04/jaguar-joins-bmw-in-offering-hd-radio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/04/jaguar-joins-bmw-in-offering-hd-radio/</guid><description><![CDATA['Hefty $500'? Buy an aftermarket deck and get the HD option. It's $450. So, how is $50 more 'hefty'? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Lyon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 4th 2007 11:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/04/jaguar-joins-bmw-in-offering-hd-radio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/04/jaguar-joins-bmw-in-offering-hd-radio/</guid><description><![CDATA[That new bumper & grill are so aftermarket . . . .]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AMcA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 4th 2007 9:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/04/jaguar-joins-bmw-in-offering-hd-radio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/04/jaguar-joins-bmw-in-offering-hd-radio/</guid><description><![CDATA[HD radio sounds great compared to FM and satelite!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ajay]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 4th 2007 11:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/04/jaguar-joins-bmw-in-offering-hd-radio/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/04/jaguar-joins-bmw-in-offering-hd-radio/</guid><description><![CDATA[“Sirius, XM, and HD: Consumer interest reality check”<br><br>“While interest in satellite radio is diminishing, interest in HD shows no signs of a pulse.”<br><br><a href="http://www.hear2.com/2007/02/sirius_xm_and_h.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.hear2.com/2007/02/sirius_xm_and_h.html</a><br><br>"Is Pay-for-Play HD Content on Horizon?"<br><br><a href="http://rwonline.com/pages/s.0049/t.4028.html" rel="nofollow">http://rwonline.com/pages/s.0049/t.4028.html</a><br><br>“HD Radio on the Offense” <br><br>“But after an investigation of HD Radio units, the stations playing HD, and the company that owns the technology; and some interviews with the wonks in DC, it looks like HD Radio is a high-level corporate scam, a huge carny shill.” <br><br><a href="http://www.eastbayexpress.com/2007-03-07/music/hd-radio-on-the-offense" rel="nofollow">http://www.eastbayexpress.com/2007-03-07/music/hd-radio-on-the-offense</a><br><br>"The FCC Tunes Into HD Radio--And May Turn Off  Distant AM"<br><br><a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fasterforward/2007/03/the_fcc_greenlights_hd_radio_n.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fasterforward/2007/03/the_fcc_greenlights_hd_radio_n.html</a><br><br>“RW Opinion: Rethinking AM’s future” <br><br>“Making AM-HD work well as a long-term investment is seen as an expensive and risky challenge for most stations and their owners. There is the significant downside of potential new interference to some of their own AM analog listeners as well as listeners of adjacent-channel stations.”<br><br><a href="http://www.rwonline.com/pages/s.0044/t.557.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.rwonline.com/pages/s.0044/t.557.html</a><br><br>HD Radio is a farce - consumers are not interested in this expensive joke.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 5th 2007 1:43PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>