http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/ Autoblog Comments for Mythbusters fail to foil the speed camera http://www.autoblog.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.autoblog.com en-us Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/Mar 8th 2007 12:12PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/
So an illegal law isn't a law at all.

Fight tyranny!]]>Mar 8th 2007 12:16PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/Mar 8th 2007 12:26PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/
Doesn't look like the 5th amendment has anything about the presentation of tickets via the mail to me.
]]>Mar 8th 2007 12:28PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/Mar 8th 2007 12:31PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/Mar 8th 2007 12:42PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/
Secondly, they didn't even try it properly, as it's already been shown that at 170mph, you won't get flashed. They didn't go that fast.

and lastly, isn't it ironic that the person who invented the Gatso camera, Maurits Gatsonides, invented it to photograph himself driving thorugh corners in rallies so he could drive FASTER!]]>May 27th 2007 12:05PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/Mar 8th 2007 12:49PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/
http://www.montrealvip.com/montrealgrandprix.html]]>Mar 8th 2007 12:50PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/Mar 8th 2007 12:53PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/Mar 8th 2007 12:54PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/Mar 8th 2007 1:08PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/Mar 8th 2007 1:34PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/Also, about them finding a solution to a breathalyser, if you read how they work, it would be very hard to disguise the results without putting in your mouth that would be so painfully obvious the cop would laugh and make you take it out. Breathalysers look at the alcohol content in your breath, not inside your mouth as many people think. The only time they are off is when people stupidly try to use mouthwash or breath strips and hold some of that in their mouth. That just gives much higher result and shows you are obviously trying to mess with the test.
The reason I know this is that in my senior year in high school, I did a state science project testing the breathalyser, and tried to see if there was any way of messing with the results. My friend and I tried almost all the stuff that the mythbusters tried, and then some, and nothing changed the results for the better. In fact, the idea that putting baking soda in your mouth beforehand and blowing it down into the breathalyser is what killed it, and ended up costing us 220 dollars to have it repaired before sending it back to the manufacturer.]]>Mar 8th 2007 1:40PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/Mar 8th 2007 1:43PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/
No due process of law. There is no accuser, no evidence, no nothing.
]]>Mar 8th 2007 1:50PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/
not to stand up for lazy police depts but they do have an accuser-the city-and evidence-the speed cam photo. what they don't have is proof that u were driving the car. there's still reasonable doubt if they don't have ur face in the photo. which means u'll either have to present evidence or a witness at the hearing as an alibi.]]>Mar 8th 2007 2:01PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/
In Kazakhstan however, it is considered the carriage of royalty.]]>Mar 8th 2007 2:12PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/Mar 8th 2007 2:16PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/http://www.autoblog.com/2007/03/08/mythbusters-fail-to-foil-the-speedcamera/
But thats the point, they could easily just take a photo of my car at any old time and just say I was speeding.

Due process of the law should me enforced by a person of the law, not some automated piece of equipment that easily be rigged or wrong.]]>Mar 8th 2007 2:21PM