<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for Chicago Preview: Dodge facelifts the Dakota for 2008</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for Chicago Preview: Dodge facelifts the Dakota for 2008</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Chicago Preview: Dodge facelifts the Dakota for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh, the horror! The current one was ugly, looks like the tradition still holds. In fact, all Dodges right now looks like the damn Avenger.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Endurancevm]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2007 5:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Chicago Preview: Dodge facelifts the Dakota for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[In the mid-ninties Dodge's were the prettiest trucks on the road. Especially the Dakota.<br><br>This thing is an eyesore. I can't see one body line on it that looks correct.<br><br>Ugh.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonny Rock]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2007 5:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Chicago Preview: Dodge facelifts the Dakota for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[My sentiments echo those of # 1 & 2 ... <br><br>This has a face that only a mother could love !!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2007 5:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Chicago Preview: Dodge facelifts the Dakota for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thank God, because it needed it.  Not that this is terribly attractive.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Misaniovent]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2007 5:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Chicago Preview: Dodge facelifts the Dakota for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[I guess "facelift" now means "purposely made uglier then before".]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2007 5:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Chicago Preview: Dodge facelifts the Dakota for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[is it just me or are all chrysler interiors boring and cheap looking?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ECA]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2007 5:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Chicago Preview: Dodge facelifts the Dakota for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Dear Dodge:  It seems that you have been having some trouble as of late figuring out how to sell midsize trucks.  We, as car enthusiasts (and individuals who want to be able to support domestic manufacturers) offer the following suggestions.  <br>1. Stop making the Dakota so damn ugly.  Give Forrest Gump's friend his lower lip back, stop stretching the front overhang and lowering the headlights and stop, for the love of all that is holy, PLEASE stop making the Chrysler Aspen.  Right now.  <br>2.  We are aware that your engines make your trucks move.  Congratulations.  We'd like to remind you that drivers also stop and turn occasionally, too.  How about some brake work and a suspension can handle the rated payload while not imitating a buckboard when empty?<br>3.  Please, please, please stop playing catch-up on transmissions.  Four speeds is not acceptable.  Five just barely makes you competitive.  If you are still wondering how many gears a transmission should have, I will give you a hint.  I am thinking of a number between five and seven.  <br>4.  How about trying something new.  Everyone has a  V-6 and a v-8.   Your lederhosen-wearing brothers have a cool new diesel that they are sharing with Jeep.  Try getting in on the action.  A mid-size pickup with a torquey diesel would be a dream come  true for those of us who want a great compromise between towing capacity and fuel economy.  If you build it, we will come.   ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Waltzon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2007 5:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Chicago Preview: Dodge facelifts the Dakota for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[so it's difficult to say whether this is enough less-bad than the GM midsize pickups to be a good deal.  It's certainly less antique than the Ranger, but I don't see any reason to buy it over a Tacoma.  Still, it will probably undercut the real-world prices of the competitive Tacoma, so some people will buy it.  Overall, it reminds me of the '79 D100 pickup I used to have, except these pics aren't in TXDoT yellow.  I just don't see anyone buying this truck on looks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DKB_SATX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2007 6:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Chicago Preview: Dodge facelifts the Dakota for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA["Congratulations. We'd like to remind you that drivers also stop and turn occasionally, too. How about some brake work and a suspension can handle the rated payload while not imitating a buckboard when empty?<br>3. Please, please, please stop playing catch-up on transmissions. Four speeds is not acceptable. Five just barely makes you competitive. If you are still wondering how many gears a transmission should have, I will give you a hint. I am thinking of a number between five and seven. <br>4. How about trying something new. Everyone has a V-6 and a v-8. Your lederhosen-wearing brothers have a cool new diesel that they are sharing with Jeep. Try getting in on the action. A mid-size pickup with a torquey diesel would be a dream come true for those of us who want a great compromise between towing capacity and fuel economy. If you build it, we will come. "<br><br>Catch up on transmissions? The V-8 comes with a 5 speed automatic, it doesn't need any more gears.<br><br>It's already known that Cummins is going to be supplying DCX with a new V-6 and V-8 Diesels. V-6 will go to the Dakota and V-8 will see duty in the Ram 1500 and Durango. Oh yea anyone catch that this is 290 horsepower on regular fuel? With better economy than the current 4.7L which matches the PREMIUM FUEL running Toyota V-6?<br><br>Still class leading horsepower. Class leading towing capacity. <br><br>The reason for the lower fascia and more pronounced is the replaceable front tips on the frame. with it being lower it should please the whiners about "car safety".<br><br>The suspension can handle the payload quiet nicely actually, and as with all trucks, they do bounce around when empty.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dakota]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2007 6:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Chicago Preview: Dodge facelifts the Dakota for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Another ugly vehicle from Dodge! I'm not really surprised I guess, but my God. This is ugly!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2007 6:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Chicago Preview: Dodge facelifts the Dakota for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[#6 you read my mind. I can't believe how sparse and cheap looking Chrysler/Dodge interiors have  become. This thing looks like a Grand Am dull Grey circa 1995. How about a little contrasting trim pieces instead of just ugly cheap looking plastic? My '99 Intrepid had a nicer interior. The knobs look like the generic Radio Shack knobs used for hobby projects. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim P.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2007 7:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Chicago Preview: Dodge facelifts the Dakota for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA["My '99 Intrepid had a nicer interior."<br><br>That's hilarious. Out of all the 2nd generation LH cars, the Intrepid by far had the worst interior, crappy seats, and the same color plastic all over. The 1st generation had it better.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dakota]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2007 7:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Chicago Preview: Dodge facelifts the Dakota for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sometimes I wonder if DCX is purposely making Dodge/Chrysler cars and trucks ugly? A 1st year design student could design a more pleasing interior.  <br><br>It's 2007 -- it's time for the SEA OF GRAY interiors to go away, even on trucks! Heck, a 1993 Dakota is better looking inside and out!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2007 8:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Chicago Preview: Dodge facelifts the Dakota for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree with ECU. I was at an autoshow last week. Chrysler/Dodge/Jeep have 6 vehicles there. They had a Ram 2500 Diesel, a Dodge Caliber, a Dodge Nitro,  Chrysler Sebring, a Jeep Wrangler and a 300C. EVERY SINGLE ONE had the exact same plastic and ugliness. All the plastics were hard and ALL GREY. Where has all the other color gone Chrysler??]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob R.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2007 8:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Chicago Preview: Dodge facelifts the Dakota for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[ Sorry, I meant ECA (post #6). I was in a rush to type the comment. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob R.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2007 8:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Chicago Preview: Dodge facelifts the Dakota for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[they gonna brig back manual on the 4.7?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dean]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2007 8:59PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Chicago Preview: Dodge facelifts the Dakota for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Oops and the last gen Sebring was there.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob R.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2007 9:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Chicago Preview: Dodge facelifts the Dakota for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[its disapointing]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Big jim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2007 9:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Chicago Preview: Dodge facelifts the Dakota for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[I suppose those who buy a vehicle for looks rather then use, may not be pleased. As well as those who want the newest and latest gadget. What is appealing to those who want this as a truck, and not eye candy, is the size. The Dakota is pretty well the size of truck, the other ones use to be. While the Fords GMCs and big brother Dodges grew to be a PITA to park and maneuver, the Dakota filled the gap. Unfortunately the smaller trucks caught up in size and the Dakota is no longer a novelty.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Barney]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2007 9:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Chicago Preview: Dodge facelifts the Dakota for 2008]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/04/chicago-preview-dodge-facelifts-the-dakota-for-2008/</guid><description><![CDATA[Damn is that thing ugly!   It's bland and without any character at all.   What has happened to Dodge?   They used to have some oooommph to their designs.   Now they are invisible.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[laserwizard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 4th 2007 10:50PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>