<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/02/motor-trend-aston-martin-sold-but-maybe-not-to-lvmh/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/02/motor-trend-aston-martin-sold-but-maybe-not-to-lvmh/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/02/motor-trend-aston-martin-sold-but-maybe-not-to-lvmh/</guid><description><![CDATA[EDIT: Actually, their bags DO have the LV logo on them, but only because they wouldn't be caught dead with anything less. That doesn't mean, however, that LV has bought them, it's simply proof that Aston Martin has good fashion sense.<br>*hehe*<br>-Taylor]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor Alexander]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 3rd 2007 12:43AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>