<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for Motor Trend: Aston Martin sold, but maybe not to LVMH</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/02/motor-trend-aston-martin-sold-but-maybe-not-to-lvmh/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for Motor Trend: Aston Martin sold, but maybe not to LVMH</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motor Trend: Aston Martin sold, but maybe not to LVMH]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/02/motor-trend-aston-martin-sold-but-maybe-not-to-lvmh/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/02/02/motor-trend-aston-martin-sold-but-maybe-not-to-lvmh/</guid><description><![CDATA[As I posted last night, it simply isn't conceivable that a buyer could be named yet, especially since bidding just concluded. Number one, it's going to take several weeks to compare and contrast the bids. Number two, all of the bids are going to have varying conditions, ie; amount of debt involved, cash vs stock, etc.. Number three and most important of all, the Ford Board of Directors hasn't even scheduled a date to meet to select a winning bidder. The MT report is just as baseless as the Autobild one.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 2nd 2007 9:04PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>