
Click above image for photo gallery
The Cadillac SRX sold a little over 22,000 units in 2006. Based on our time spent behind the wheel, we're guessing that a lot of the angular crossover's buyers are satisfied customers. Marketed as an SUV upon release, Cadillac later relented and has (correctly) positioned the SRX as a CUV. After all, the SUV moniker summons mental images of a vehicle that might not offer a forgiving ride for its occupants. The SRX is the opposite of all that.
Follow the jump for the review in full.


For 2007, the SRX received attention from Cadillac that has managed to remain a bit under the radar. It concerns the vehicle's passenger cabin, and it's where we'll start. This year, the SRX was bestowed with the new Cut & Sew interior. This means more than just additional leather, mind you. While the basic interior configuration remained the same, the trim and materials were completely overhauled. Granted, the '06 was certainly not a bad place to sit, but the '07 truly elevates the standard for the Cadillac brand (something we saw advance even higher in Detroit with the introduction of the stunning 2008 CTS).
For starters, the center stack has been revamped, now capped and bordered by an aluminum trim piece that adds much needed detail and acts as the frame for reshaped, classier-looking heating vents. The entire dashboard, the door panels, and even the transmission tunnel are now trimmed in leather. The stitching on the hides adds richness to the overall ambiance and really completes the look. It's remarkable how something so simple can help transform a decent interior into a great one.
The instrumentation is similar to what's offered in the Escalade, except the SRX gets red needles as opposed to the blue ones in it's big-truck sibling. The aforementioned center stack contains the head unit for the Bose 5.1 audio system, which includes a single-disc CD player, MP3 compatibility, DVD, navigation and XM radio. The climate controls are uncluttered and use dials for the main functions. In a smart move, Cadillac locates the controls for the seat heaters on the door-mounted armrests. This places them in an accessible spot for both driver and passenger, helps maintain the dash/stack's clean, uncluttered look, and eliminates one of the negatives we experienced with the Escalade, which was a very crammed climate control panel. The center console features ample storage, and the woodgrain trim that ornaments both it and the dashboard is particularly pleasing to the eye. Another nifty feature in the SRX's cabin is the double glove box. The traditional one is where you'd expect it to be. Directly above it, you notice that the wood trim has an indentation in it which, when pressed, opens a "secret" compartment that's fully lined. It's perfect for items you may not want rattling around in the deep center console bin. More than one guest riding shotgun noted that it'd be the perfect place to stash the types of items that we'll simply say wouldn't make it through an airport security checkpoint. And no, we're not talking about shampoo, either.


Our SRX was also fitted with the premium seating package, which comfortably ensconced us in smart-looking, well-bolstered and all-around wonderful leather cocoons that felt like they'd be more than up to the task of keeping us comfy on extended-length drives. Backseat passengers also commented on the car's overall comfort, and in our case there was no optional third row. Instead, the rear cargo area was equipped with three below-the-floor storage bins that seemed a lot more practical to us than what would have undoubtedly been a pretty cramped third row. All occupants are bathed in outdoor light, courtesy of the crowd-pleasing Ultraview sunroof that came as part of our car's $7,150 Premium Luxury Package. The massive glass panel, when opened, exposed the front seats in their entirety and part of the second row as well. Opening it is a slow, precise operation (we're guessing that's due to the weight of the glass) that gives the whole affair a theatrical quality. It's like opening the roof of Toronto's Skydome.


Outside, the SRX is mostly unchanged for '07. We're fans of the general look, which is unmistakably modern Caddy. As such, the creases are where you'd expect them to be, and the headlight and grille shapes are instantly recognizable. Those who opt for the available Sport Package (which are car wasn't equipped with) get a better-looking grille with more open elements and mesh backing. It's more in keeping with Escalade, the Chinese-market SLS, and the '08 CTS. The Sport also gets a lip spoiler and 20" wheels. The 18" alloys on our car looked substantial and had full-color Cadillac shields decorating the wheel centers.


Popping the hood on the SRX reveals the increasingly familiar 3.6-liter V6, which produces 260 horsepower and continues to impress us with its smooth operation and responsiveness. In the SRX, it's joined to GM's
Hydra-Matic 5L40 five-speed auto, which includes a manual shift mode that frankly, we never used. If you want a six-speed, you need to upgrade to the more costly Northstar. Note to Cadillac: make a six the standard transmission for both engines. If you think the absence of the V8 turns the SRX into a dog, you're completely off the mark. The fact is, we seriously wondered if the upgrade would even be worth it. Paper jockeys will no doubt exclaim that 260 horsepower is nothing, but you'd be hard pressed to say that after a stint behind the wheel. The 3.6L is very good -- quiet but stout enough to move the SRX briskly. We never once felt like we didn't have enough power on tap, and the Caddy accelerated well and cruised at proper highway speeds with ease.

In terms of overall ride and handling, it's nothing short of excellent. Our SRX was equipped with all-wheel-drive ($1,900) and magnetic ride control ($1,650), which when combined with a wonderfully-sorted chassis made for one of the better driving experiences we've had in a while. The SRX feels lighter and more nimble than you'd expect for a tall wagon/ute, and it eagerly tackled curvy local roads and our favorite sweeping highway connector without the slightest hint of misbehavior. This is a crossover whose sportiness makes it a hauler you want to jump into and drive somewhere. If you want an example of the clichéd term, "car-like ride," this is a very good one. We were caught totally by surprise, as we'd have never pegged this to be such a rewarding vehicle to drive. And we must add that it's as happy and comfortable patrolling Manhattan's urban canyons as it is tree-lined suburban thoroughfares. We observed fuel economy in the 17 - 18 mpg range while it was with us. Our driving was a pretty fair split of city and highway, but save for one day where the traffic gods cooperated, said highway miles were generally (and frustratingly) of the stop-and-go variety. The EPA rates it at 16/23 city/highway.


We'll have to assume that the sure-footedness the SRX's AWD system likely offers in sloppier weather only adds to the list of positives, since we were blessed with excellent weather while it lived in our garage. That was fine by us, as we had the roof glass open at every opportunity, even if it was a bit chilly at times.


Cadillac's Alpha Male is without question the charismatic Escalade, but if we were writing checks to our local Caddy retailer, the big, blinged-out SUV would remain on the lot while we drove off in the SRX. It's got a superlative interior, an excellent ride, and a unique look that isn't shared with any other GM-family vehicle. Put simply: it's the superior car. At an as-tested price of $48,180, including destination charge, it's certainly not inexpensive, but we'd hazard a guess that it's as good or better an everyday machine than several competitors priced at or above its level. At Cadillac, the Escalade is the headliner, but the SRX is one of those opening acts that makes you think, "Gee, maybe that other guy should warm up for him instead."





All photos Copyright ©2007 Alex Nunez / Weblogs, Inc.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
rrr @ Jan 29th 2007 12:04PM
The only way 99.9% of people can judge cars is purely on looks. Most of us have never test driven this car, and never sat in it.
In my opinion this SUV LOOKS great, it maybe a terrible driving machine but based on looks only...it is great.
I never really understud why it is not a big hit, even bigger than Escalade, which is so clearly based on Tahoe.
BTW, look at Caddilac's grill, i guess we now all know where Fusion,Edge get their inspiration.
gkz @ Jan 29th 2007 12:16PM
So you have absolutely nothing critical to say about the car. I believe you that its a perfectly nice, pleasant, and competent car; but even MT/C&D/R&T can usually thrown a little honesty in their reviews.
If this (and the other reviews this site has posted so far) is the kind of kiss-ass material you have to write in order to convince the manufacturers to hand you keys - just stop. A little objectivity would be nice. We're not morons.
Alain @ Jan 29th 2007 12:26PM
OK, gkz, here goes: Toyotas suck ass. It's more profound than it appears.
Brad Evanson @ Jan 29th 2007 12:35PM
I recently had the opportunity to drive the 2007 SRX V6 against the Lexus RX 350 at a Car and Driver "Editor for a Day" event in San Diego. Frankly, I picked the Caddy. It drove very nicely, rode better than the Lexus, had a smoother tranny, and a much nicer interior. The only place where I liked the Lexus better was it had a little more pickup. That being said, the Caddy's power was more than adequate. Fit and finish was great, and the new interior was a huge improvement over the '06. GKZ, I don't think Alex was just kissing ass or anything like that. The SRX is that good. I'm not saying it's going to handle like a Cayenne or X5, nor am I saying it's going to offroad like the LR3. It is a very good all around package, and that's what AB is reporting. And for the record, I don't work for GM or Caddy...I do environmental consulting work for cities and counties in Southern California and I drive a Jeep Grand Cherokee. If I can swing the $$$ when my lease is up, bet your ass I'll look at the SRX.
CF @ Jan 29th 2007 12:35PM
Damn, gkz. Did you get up on the wrong side of the bed this morning or what? The SRX is not perfect--no vehicle is--but contrary to popular opinion, GM does get some things right now & then.
Svend @ Jan 29th 2007 12:56PM
SRX is over rated and the rear is ugly to me. Fronts ok.
They sold 22,000 last year yes, but sales were down 9%. Luxury SUV/CUV sales were up.
PJ @ Jan 29th 2007 1:14PM
gkz, I agree that there's no abundance of depth in AB's reviews. They read much like the "Preview" or "First Drive" reports in the major mags: overwhelmingly glowing, with a few trivial detail criticisms sprinkled in.
Also like those first-look articles, this review avoids comparing the SRX to its class competitors, and instead compares it the previous SRX, and other Cadillacs: "Compared to the Escalade, this is a great crossover!"
The ironic part is that the SRX holds up well even under a genuinely critical eye. Its revised interior is still several steps behind Lexus for perceived quality, but it no longer feels cheap, and it's a better drive than the RX. If GM stiffened the structure and dialed back the steering assist a little, they'd have a genuine X5 and M-Class alternative on their hands.
ryan @ Jan 29th 2007 1:33PM
This "CUV" I have always thought looked out of proportion as you get towards the rear of the car looking from the side.
But overall, GM's problems are not usually with how a car looks, they're ok in that area, just not on this car.
It has been fun reading the 2007 Cadillac SRX sales brochure, thanks!
Accordsforall @ Jan 29th 2007 1:34PM
Hmmm
I hate to be a prick.. but its a source of pride for me. And I have to say.. ADVERTISING doesnt say a g-d thing about that soft load of monkey crap.
SO AUTOBLOG ya mean to say that they used to say it was an SUV.. even tho most SUVS are body on frame?
Or do you understand that this SRX is really a CTS WAGON? With a unibody frame.. thats been totally jacked up. For those.. who really think their skills are up to piloting this load of crap.. to the mall?
And are you saying.. that you need to be told through ADVERTISING what this damn vehicle is?? Ya cant just figure out how its built, where its built?
Do ya need to be told that a GMC DENALI / CHEV TAHOE / Caddy ESCALADE and all of their short and long forms.. are the same?!
Ya gonna start telling me that Subbie makes compact SUVS now?? Even tho.. for the past 20+yrs theyve made WAGONS!!! As much as I do love.. AUTOBLOG.. a little think for yourself.. would be really nice.
And remember.. this SRX (german speak for.. we want to be like the germans in their design and nomenclature) is just another crossover thats fights the fight with the MDX / RX.
((Holds back my deep hatred for anything resembling a SUV / CUV))
AUTOBLOG.. OPEN YOUR EYES!!!
gkz @ Jan 29th 2007 1:49PM
3,4 & 5 -
As i wrote originally, I have no problem believing the SRX is a very good car. This has nothing to do with GM and certainly nothing to do with Toyota (whatever that comment was supposed to be).
My ONLY problem is that does not do a good job of giving even the appearance of objectivity. Based on the several reviews the site has done so far, it appears the site is trading glowing reviews in exchange for the chance do test new cars. I don't think this is true, but the reviews do come across that way.
Please don't make phantom inferences. What i meant is exactly what i wrote; no more, no less.
dave @ Jan 29th 2007 1:51PM
rrr, i fail to get the correlation between the grille. gkz, just maybe gm has achieved something most of us knew was possible. a great car. i test drove an 06 of which i thought was an exceptionally good car, but settled for an sts-v. no regrets on my part, but because my better half wanted the srx, the dinners at home have not been that good lately.
ryan @ Jan 29th 2007 2:01PM
"11. rrr, i fail to get the correlation between the grille. gkz, just maybe gm has achieved something most of us knew was possible. a great car."
-And what do you know, it dosent sell.
Is it possible GM built a good car, but it's jus' gonna' be a flop?
Paul @ Jan 29th 2007 2:15PM
Nice review--Cadillac is definitely doing well these days. For those who think that Autoblog is just sucking up, an SRX V8 beat a Touareg, an FX45, and a Cayenne in a Car and Driver comparison test a couple years ago, so it's definitely a damn good vehicle.
How long do you get to drive these vehicles when they're "In the Autoblog Garage"? A day? A week?
gkz @ Jan 29th 2007 2:15PM
it was supposed to read:" my only problem is that THE SITE does not do..."
sorry
W L Simpson @ Jan 29th 2007 2:18PM
Is the 07 greatly improved over previous years? Satisfaction/quality is usually reflected in the resale value & earlier years are taking a terrible hit.
Michael Karesh @ Jan 29th 2007 2:20PM
A couple comments:
--wagon proportions, an unliked interior, and an initially high priced killed sales
---the magnetic ride control suspension vastly improves the handling of the SRX
A couple corrections:
--the sewn material on the instrument panel and doors is leatherette (vinyl), not leather
--the "woodgrain" trim is real wood; "woodgrain" is generally used to denote the fake stuff
For those seeking price comparisons:
http://www.truedelta.com/models/SRX.php
W L Simpson @ Jan 29th 2007 3:26PM
What this "jewel" needs is SSing w/ a 3" sectioning just above the floor, effectively closing gap over tires, side chrome ,roof rack & hideous dash trim ring delete. buy one in a heartbeat!
Misaniovent @ Jan 29th 2007 4:20PM
It's sort of interesting at the disbelief treat this vehicle with. It's won every comparison I've seen it in -- not that I've necessarily seen them all.
Phil @ Jan 29th 2007 4:27PM
For the haters out there, almost every CUV went down in sales in it's third year, so this is no surprise.
Reviewers from the harshest magazines said this was a great drive from the start, so why would this be any different? Now that it has a decent interior, why wouldn't the overall review be great??
CAR & DRIVER gave it best luxury SUV for a couple of years, and they hate GM, so what does that tell you???
Styling is objective, and I think it can be better on this car, but the redesign is coming right on time for early '09, so who cares??
Back off, haters!
Typesbad @ Jan 29th 2007 5:11PM
I'm glad this featured a V-6 model. I get so tired of only vehicles with the largest available engine getting reviewed. Specifically, it was nice to hear that the V-6 with AWD was satisfactory to a gear-head group. I'm so glad they fixed up the instrument panel. The new one looks to be nothing special but it is no longer an detriment. I did hate to see the old vents go though. They were the only thing I liked about the old dash, I bet the old ones were more expensive too.
My one objection to the exterior is the I'm- pretending-to-be-a-sedan C-pillar. This bugs me wherever I see it. It's as if a two box design is someting to be ashamed of, which seems a bit old-think to me. It also is a functional liability forcing rear passengers to duck their heads on egress. Sedans have an obvious reason for this but wagon shapes have no excuse outside of milplaced vanity. I was glad to see the MDX and RX walk from this design mis-step, hopefully the SRX will follow on its second-gen design.
I too would have liked a little more depth in the review. Since there was no optional third row (disappointing) I would like to have heard a little more about the cargo area.
Still, it is nice to hear about a Cadillac being competitive in such a strong import segment.