
After last week's flurry of news from Detroit, we're realizing that little was heard from Mercury. Parent Ford certainly had some introductions and unveilings, but nothing from across the corporate hall. It makes us wonder whether the Mercury brand is going to completely wither and die, or if Ford's got some surprises left. There really seems to be little point to the brand. There are no Mercury-specific models like there once were (Cougar, Villager, etc.) and really nothing particularly compelling for sale. Perhaps giving Mercury a segment to fill would drive the brand.
More armchair quarterbacking after the jump
[Source: Detroit News]
How about nixing the Fusion and making the Milan the place to go for your C-segment car? The MKZ should hang around to fill the lux niche. The Milan is arguably more handsome than the Fusion, and definitely has a nicer interior. That'd at least give people one reason to enter the Mercury store. Mercury's game plan is to be the bridge between Ford and Lincoln; what that means for now is badge-engineering by way of fascias and accoutrement.
Once the Way Forward becomes a clear path, we may see the sun rise on new and distinctive Mercurys. Part of what's eating at Alan Mulally is that Ford globally is about more than the blue oval. There are several different branches on the family tree worldwide, each with distinct product. This stratification leads directly to us US drivers acting like Beatlemania-posessed teenage girls. Ga-ga over the Euro offerings; pressed up against the fence, trying to get at the Mondeo or Focus. Mulally is keen to bring Ford's worldwide operations closer together, and acknowledges that we deserve fewer Emperor's New Clothes "remakes," and more soul-stirring machinery.

There are different design themes between Ford in the US and Ford abroad. Part of merging and streamlining global operations will be a convergence of design. That doesn't mean F-Series trucks that look like the Transit, but it will mean finding some common themes that make Fords recognizeable worldwide. May we suggest, if they're hot to bring the European product over to the Colonies, making Mercury the sole agent for those uniquely-accented Fords? Spiffy interiors and different faces only go so far.

Letting Mercury be the sole outlet for something different than what's across town at the Ford lot would at least get some notice. There also exists an opportunity to punch-up the style coming out of Mercury. Style is largely a misnomer for the brand right now. The Grand Marquis has all the style of a pair of orthopedic shoes. Sure, it's a nice enough car; but there's not a line on the flanks that appeals to anyone under 70 that's not a cop or cabdriver. The Montego is even more ho-hum than its Ford Five Hundred sister. Only the Milan and the Mountaineer have some semblance of uniqueness to them, and they're far more handsome than their Ford counterparts. How about building on that? The Norelco grille is classier than the "three bar."
Let's not go wild, but hopefully things will improve as Ford starts to get their act together. Currently lagging GM's turnaround, the business term for Ford's current state is: a mess. They are looking to replace or redesign 70-percent of their offerings across all their brands by 2010. Expect key vehicles to have more attention lavished on them. "Key" must denote the cars that the brand is being staked on. We'll be waiting to see that kind of commitment from the Blue Oval. We've seen desperate, confused moves so far. Whoops, we mean we've seen Ford "focusing on its strengths, rather than matching the competition one-to-one with vehicles." Hopefully Mercury can recall it's the Cougar, not the cower.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 5)
Tim UF @ Jan 16th 2007 1:08PM
So long as mercury keeps Jill Wagner in their commercials, i'm happy.
also, merc's are a nice alternative for those who want a ford product (fusion) but cant stand the 'bold' design craptacular grille...
Oliver @ Jan 16th 2007 1:13PM
Nothing moves you, like a Mercury........
Corvette Commander @ Jan 16th 2007 1:14PM
When Mark Fields was interviewed by Wert over at Jalopnik, his comment on the question of "What is Mercury?" was basically: "Not Ford." Here's the interview:
http://jalopnik.com/cars/detroit-auto-show/detroit-auto-show-exclusive-we-talk-to-mark-fields-make-zero-mullet-jokes-227232.php
Robert @ Jan 16th 2007 1:17PM
I think the best use of Mercury is to create a chic small car alternative to Scion or Mini. Bring the Ka, Fiesta, build a small SUV (not the Escape, maybe like the Bronco concept), and have something like the Mazda5 and return a compact sport coupe based on the B or C2 platform. Make it a bit upscale, but not quite like the C30. It would be a completely different angle size wise but not image. They are branding Mercury as urban chic, so why not make it truly urban chic with small, yet upscale designs?
If they don't do something like that, then they have no use for Mercury. Cut it. Drop it. Kill it.
And, excuse me, but I don't think Ford's turnaround is a mess right now (in fact, I'd say they are right where GM was this time last year, maybe ahead, but their restructuring started almost a year later as well). I just don't think we can see what's going on behind the curtain yet.
Just my two cents.
el indiano @ Jan 16th 2007 1:21PM
mercury is a useless brand. aren't all mercury's cars shared with ford?
kill mercury and use that money to help make ford better.
but keep the hot chick from the tv spots.
Nr9 @ Jan 16th 2007 1:22PM
mercury milan is a classier and cleaner alternative to the ford fusion.
if there's no mercury, there would probably be no milan, so mercury is a good thing.
John P. @ Jan 16th 2007 1:24PM
Mercury's Rebadged Escape, The Mariner looks good, the Milan looks good, but there's no real point to either since they are basically rebadged/better looking Fords.
Mercury needs the Mondeo and S-Max here NOW!!!!!! It just seems so obvious to me they would fit perfectly between Ford and the "New" Lincoln.
Please? Pretty Please?
Art Vandelay @ Jan 16th 2007 1:26PM
Actually, Ford is revamping 70% of their lineup by 2008 and 100% by 2010.
Daniel @ Jan 16th 2007 1:27PM
Mercury should be a distinct and up-scale bridge product between Ford and Lincoln. Ya know, the way it was back with Ford ruled the world in the '50s and '60s.
It is a no brainer to bring the latest hot Ford or Europe stuff to the U.S. as a Mercury. Mercury Mondeo has a nice ring to it, don't you think?
It is a good idea to use the basic platforms over a range of corporate product but for God's sake - change the sheet metal between the brands - the Fusion triples should be much more distinct.
Now if you really want to bring folks into the Mercury showrooms - build an up-scale Cougar based on the Mustang platform - with a Turbo V6 and an optional DOHC 5.0L V8 and design it to compete directly with the Lexus IS and the Infinity G35, and BMW 3 series.
Another kick ass product would be a new Mercury Marauder based on the Ford Interceptor (I want one now).
Mercury should be a very profitable brand that offers customers a distinct reason to be in their showrooms.
By the way. Mercury should get bvack into NASCAR as when David Person's #21 Purolator Merc dominated the early '70s.
I habve owned several Mercury's and they were the best, and most troble free, cars I have every seen. I would like to purchase a new one but only if it is hot and distinct (RWD V8 Cougar, Hot Marauder, Mondeo).
Good Luck - and build some stuff with PASSION.
epp_b @ Jan 16th 2007 1:28PM
["also, merc's are a nice alternative for those who want a ford product (fusion) but cant stand the 'bold' design craptacular grille..."]
It's interesting that both Ford and Gillette have a product called "Fusion". Coincidence? I think not.
emor8t @ Jan 16th 2007 1:33PM
What's the point of Mercury? Why it's the same point Buick is.
DDL @ Jan 16th 2007 1:34PM
There is no need for Mercury, especially with the Lincoln brand gaining new products. Some of these new products are the same as sold under the Mercury banner (i.e., Millan/MKZ and the Montego/MKS) and some will be different (MKX and Fairlane clone). With all the new product going to Lincoln, do you really need a brand to bridge the cap. Toyota does fine briding into Lexus, Honda into Acura and Nissan into Infiniti. If Ford needs to cut brands, to so in the middle and at the very top leaving:
Ford
Mazda
Volvo
Lincoln
Jaguar/Land Rover
jordan @ Jan 16th 2007 1:35PM
re: epp_b
what, do you expect to see commercials on tv where men are shaving with a gillette fusion while driving their ford fusion? :)
DDL @ Jan 16th 2007 1:37PM
Not Ford? Please Mr. Fields, explain how Mercury is "not Ford"?
ChrisL @ Jan 16th 2007 1:38PM
In Canada, Mercury has been dead for a few years already...and nobody missed it. Why not take a page out of Saturn's book and import European Fords under the Mercury banner. The Ka, Fiesta, C-Max and maybe even the European Focus (revive the "Tracer" name?) may be a way to gain some ground. Us Canucks have always looked at smaller cars more favorably, and the US manufacturers are a bit light in product in that end of the market.
MJL @ Jan 16th 2007 1:38PM
How about affordable luxury, giving people who want Acuras or Lexuses but can't afford them an opportunity to own similar cars. Also, there's lots of talk about Mercury going for women; that's fine by me if it sells cars. How about pushing hybrids, keeping the style of the Milan going, etc.?
SherbornSean @ Jan 16th 2007 1:40PM
The Truth About Cars did this last week.
The Other Justin @ Jan 16th 2007 1:44PM
Bring back the cougar! That was the best little car to come out of FMC in years and they killed it after a few years.
C. McFeeny @ Jan 16th 2007 1:45PM
I agree with the above poster #4 that this would be an excellent *NEW* direction to take Mercury in. However, everyone griping about the big M needs to take a close look at Mercury's history and see that M has always been as Mark Field's said to Jalopnik, "Not Ford". There were unique cars here and there in the brands history, but M has always been a badge engineered marque by and large. In this era of supposed BOLD MOVES they should live up to their creedo and do something bold and new, but will they? This is Ford after all. I'd like to think that they've seen the error of their ways in always going for the safest option, but I don't know. I don't think Ford will ever change Mercury from simply being "Not Ford".
Andrew @ Jan 16th 2007 1:46PM
I spent the holidays in Mexico and a thought struck me as I saw some Ford products that are not sold in the United States... The market seems to be clamoring for smaller cars, which Ford already has in its international stable:
I think Ford should kill the Focus and the Escape (although I do like the looks of the upcoming Escape refresh) – replace them with the Fiesta sedan and hatchback, and the EcoSport small SUV… Americanize them and make any tweaks for comfort or performance.
Then, bring over the European Focus, and restyle/sell it as the entry-level Mercury. Keep the Mercury Mariner as a unique vehicle.
I think the Fusion/Milan and Five Hundred/Montego situation needs to be addressed – cutting one from each pair would leave Ford and Mercury with different offerings.
I think Ford should be designed to compete with the other American brands, such as Chevy and Dodge, while Mercury should be moved upmarket – perhaps cutting into the niche that VW has appealed to in recent years.
Just my $0.02.