Treehugger has a post about a life cycle analysis of carbon emissions for various drive-train types that includes manufacturing and use of the vehicles. The study was originally done by researchers from Seikei University in Tokyo, Japan in 2001. They did a detailed analysis of the energy consumption to manufacture the different types of vehicles, based on the CO2 emissions for each.
The battery-powered cars are much more energy intensive to build than gas or hybrid cars, based mostly on the cost of producing the batteries themselves. For the use phase of the analysis, they also did three different examples for the electric car, based on the energy source for the electricity. When using electricity from coal, the total CO2 emissions for the electric car was almost as much as the gasoline car and almost twice as much as the hybrid. Electricity from natural gas was much better but still not as as good as the hybrid and the cleanest by far was the EV with hydro-electric power.

However, one thing that seems to be missing from this analysis is the post life phase. How much energy is used (and subsequent CO2 emissions) will also vary for these different types of vehicles. The iron and aluminum that comprise most of the content of an internal combustion engine are fairly easy to recycle by simply melting down and re-casting. Disposing of batteries is substantially more complicated.

[Source: Institute for Lifecycle Environmental Assessment via TreeHugger]

I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • From Our Partners

    You May Like
    Links by Zergnet
    Share This Photo X