Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
BREAKING: GM and Chrysler talking about merger
Spy Shots: Nissan 370Z again, with interior shots
2010 Mazda3 unveiled ahead of LA Auto Show
Spy Shots: Nissan 370Z caught undisguised
GM on Corvette ZR1 cancellation rumor: "Not true."
Knight Rider: The Liveblog -- Season 1, Episode 3
In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Mazda RX-8 R3, return of the "hummer"
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Chevy Corvette Z06
Autoline on Autoblog with John McElroy
Paris 2008: Le Day 1 Wrapup
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this thread(Page 1 of 1)
hUcKiE @ Dec 15th 2006 2:30PM
Not just legal risk, but warranty repair cost and bad PR risk. Since the CX-7 is realatively new, what if the vehicles on that ship develop issues needing warranty repair at even 2 or 3% greater likelihood? Then their brand new car develops a reputation for being unreliable. I'm sure that there are a lot of factors they considered in making the decision, and in the end, guaranteed insurance payout/tac write-off probably won over unknown consequences. Car companies are very risk averse.