<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</guid><description><![CDATA[wait, that's not considered a minivan???]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 4:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</guid><description><![CDATA[FINALLY!   GM adds a conventional manumatic shifter for their automatic!    Welcome to 2006 GM!   ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 4:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</guid><description><![CDATA[At last that we have waited such fine debut, beautifully and stylishly looks.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 5:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</guid><description><![CDATA[...and they didn't call it SS.<br>They gave it the 3.6 engine.<br>They did more than just pop the aforementioned engine in.<br><br>Looks like they've covered what all of us on Autoblog spoke/complained about. Good job, GM!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[D]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 7:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now completely redesign the look of the front end, and they've got something.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 8:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's the engine and trans from the Aura XR, glad that the cool new GM tech is trickling down thru the rest of the line.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eleventeen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 8:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</guid><description><![CDATA[wow - a minivan that looks like an suv and can top at 140 - amazing! [yawn]]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DustinTarditi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 8:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</guid><description><![CDATA[Please bash away all you haters, this is a good move and great AWD people mover that will be less than the $30k Acura and Lexus are getting for their cramped sport Small SUV/CUV's. This or a RAV4, hmmmmmmmmmmm?<br><br>Let's see modern engine with high rpm and power - Check<br>6 Speed with manual option - Check<br>Sport Suspension - Check<br>Agressive exterior package - Check<br>Big Wheels for those with Dub Envy - Check<br><br>So what will the fanboi's and magazines complain about: The Interior...all that is left. "Waaah it doesn't have BLUETOOTH or WICKED LED GAUGES!"<br>And maybe EPA estimates, but that little trick is being removed from the Japanese play books.<br><br>Oh darn, we won't have bottomless pit of overpriced, but pretty after market parts with names like Spoon, Bride, Buddy Club and other mashed up Jringlish. Gosh oh what will we do.<br><br>Exactly, slap a blower on with a set of Borlas and show tunerboiz our tail lights all day long.<br><br>Thank you GM!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[LaughingTooHard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 9:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</guid><description><![CDATA[Could be a winner, depending on how much they've improved the steering and handling compared to the regular Equinox. I look forward to driving it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Karesh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 9:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</guid><description><![CDATA[That interior is amazingly attractive.  If the rear end of the equinox wasn't so rounded like a minivan and they could slap a small supercharger on for say 350hp, this thing would be smoking at $30,000.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 10:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</guid><description><![CDATA["Please bash away all you haters, this is a good move and great AWD people mover that will be less than the $30k Acura and Lexus are getting for their cramped sport Small SUV/CUV's. This or a RAV4, hmmmmmmmmmmm?"<br><br><br>LMAO.  I'll bet buyers considering an Acura or Lexus SUV aren't cross shopping Chevrolet.  Comparing an Equinox to an RDX is like comparing a fake watch to a Rolex.  A Chevrolet Equinox doesn't exactly scream "success" or "good taste". <br><br>And believe it or not, the interior is a very important part of the purchasing decision.  Why do you think people constantly criticize GM for it's cheap interiors?  Why do you think GM is (finally) spending more money on improving the dashboards and interiors of its vehicles?  <br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 10:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, GM has managed to make a nice vehicle out of that Equinox turd.  Those seats are very attractive!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 10:19AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</guid><description><![CDATA[manumatic, welcome to 1996, cue AutoStick.<br><br>The suzuki XL-7 must feel short changed, it is stuck with the AW 5 speed automatic.<br><br>If this has the 3.16 axle ratio in front wheel drive form, someone at GM needs to be shot. 1000lbs less then the new acadia/outlook/enclave, smaller wheels, less CdA.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MikeW]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 10:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</guid><description><![CDATA[If they had gone all the way and made this an SS, I'd be tempted to consider it instead of a Dodge Magnum, which is just about the only non-truck on the market that combines copious utility with uncut testosterone.<br><br>GM sees the popularity of the LX platform, and they've got to be thinking of ways to grab some of DCX's action.  Using a crossover platform to battle a station wagon might just be crazy enough to work.<br><br>So, Mr Lutz:  feel free to make an Equinox SS, I doubt you'll be sorry for it.  Lower it some more.  Make it look meaner.  Supercharge it.  If you can undercut the price of an LX R/T and deliver close to the same performance, you'll sell a load of these things.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dracos]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 10:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</guid><description><![CDATA[Very nicely turned out, a SUV I'd actually buy. The General is turning out some really nice interiors. (Take heed Ford) This truck's interior makes your luxury car MK-Z interior look really bad.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr_Oak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 10:27AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</guid><description><![CDATA[Did I say, that this is a really nice SUV.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr_Oak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 10:31AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</guid><description><![CDATA[just what the US market needs... another poor handling lump of a grocery getter.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[kab]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 10:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice.  GM just got back on the definite maybe list.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DL]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 10:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</guid><description><![CDATA[About time. Now they also need to make the new 3.5L V6 standard on the rest of the Equinoxes - that old 3.4L is a nasty POS.<br><br>For all who want to pre-judge the S - lets wait until at least the reviews are in. It looks like affordable and practical fun. No - not a BMW but then it ain't gonna be $40K+ either.<br><br>As for the minivan label, The Acura MDX SUVs are based on the Oddessy minivan, the BMW X3 is a last generation 3 series wagon in drag and you'd have to admit that the S still looks better than any Toyota Highlander.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[carguy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 10:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/12/14/2008-chevy-equinox-sport-one-s-shy-of-ss/</guid><description><![CDATA[Both Ford and GM are putting out some rather competitive SUV/CUVs these days.<br><br>BUT: MY personal appetitie to buy a nice new 4WD sporty type CUV has the following parameters.<br>Engine" 265 HP++<br>Gearbox: pref the nice six speeder<br>Seating: roomy 5 seater<br>Weight: MOST important of all I don't want another 5,000 lb monster heavy car. I want something nearer to 4,000 lbs All these new cars seem hugely weight impacted. Why?<br>What are my alternatives? I keep a car for some years and if gas does take off again I want to be able to get 25 mpg on the highway and don't want to run thru tires and brakes and dampers all the time and that's what WEIGHT does to these parts. It eats 'em up.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 14th 2006 10:51AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>