
The Corvair was GM's Porsche 911, but better, at least in some ways.. Debuting in 1960, the Corvair seemed totally out of left field from GM. It featured an air-cooled, horizontally-opposed powerplant mounted in the rear and a notorious swing-axle suspension (it was no more dangerous than its contemporaries). It was almost an entire line of vehicles, sorta like a subset of GM proper. There were trucks, vans, station wagons, sedans and coupes. Flickr member corsa180 sent in a really pretty 1965 Corvair Corsa turbo convertible. That's right, a turbo from 1965. Who says the American companies weren't/aren't innovative? He's had the car since just after high school and while it looks great in pictures, corsa180 says it's awaiting restoration. He's already been through the engine, and plans to tackle body restoration soon.
More after the jump...
We're not sure how we'd feel about having a carburetor bolted to something fed by both exhausts and an oil line, that as a bonus sometimes also glows bright red, but corsa180 seems to have a good time with his 'Vair. 1965 was a very good year for the uber-innovative Corvair. They were restyled and came out looking crisp and sporty. These were high times for American styling - the edges are starched-crisp, but the lines still have a sense of flow. 1965 also brought suspension and chassis upgrades that made the cars better performers. In many respects, the sporty Corvair coupes and convertibles were contenders for buyers considering Porsche 911/912s or other sporty Europeans like VW's Karmann Ghia or Alfa Romeos. In fact, the 'Vair for '65 had lots of nice touches like factory-installed AC (which probably worked great, GM has refrigeration down), a better heating system (always an issue with an air-cooled engine), bigger brakes, and even a telescoping wheel and stereo radio. Out back in the engine bay for '65, GM even made available a quad-carb setup on the Corsa's engine, which also had internal tweaks. Let's not forget that this fetching convertible has a turbocharger sitting atop the engine. Turbos in the 1960s were like alien technology, but GM had the cojones to install them on production cars. Turbos and carburetors are a hairy combination, but the Corvair's setup was well-enough vetted by GM's engineers that they made it to the street. The turbocharged engine made these cars like no other. Porsche took until 1973 to discover the joys of forced induction, and that was just for racing.
Unfortunately, also debuting for 1965 was Ralph Nader's book Unsafe at Any Speed, which blasted the Corvair for its' swing-axle handling dynamics. No matter the Volkswagens of the time all used swing-axle rear suspension, too. After the book debuted, VW quickly implemented an IRS design, bowing in 1968, a full three years after the Corvair banished swing-axles from its' rump. No matter, the reputation of the Corvair was dinged hard by Nader's villification. Also cutting in the popularity of the Corvair was the rise of the ponycar. In fact, the Corvair was slated to die in '66, but Nader's book spurred GM to keep it around until '69, as a nose-thumb to
1965 Corvair Corsa turbo convertible
Modifications:
Engine:
- Bored .030 over
- Forged competition pistons
- Competition flywheel
- Oversized oil pump
- Electronic ignition
- Finned aluminum oil pan
- Lowered
- Heavy duty springs, 1 coil cut in front
- Adjustable gas shocks
- Alpine pull-out stereo
Create a Flickr account if you don't already have one. Search for and join the group called 'Autoblog RR of the Day'. Upload up to three photos of your ride to your own account at a size no larger than 450 pixels wide if possible and include as much information about it and yourself as possible. Even if your ride is sweet, it will not be chosen if there's not a lot of info accompanying it. Click on each photo and just above the picture it will say "Send to group". Click that and select the Autoblog group. You're done, that's it!











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Richard Warren @ Dec 8th 2006 10:59AM
Very, very nice. Restored one of these back in the mid 80's same model. These really were the cream of the Corvairs. This body style still looks great. My wife owned the same year coupe and loved it, she talks about to this day nearly 27 years later.
These models handle well (for rear engine)quick for their day and fun to drive, I know who gets my vote this week.
Ron @ Dec 8th 2006 11:02AM
Nice ride. Always liked the Corvair. Wouldn't mind having one myself someday.
The other Bob @ Dec 8th 2006 11:05AM
Damn Ralph Nader.
That was a cool car. I have been wondering, was it fuel efficient for its day?
HotRod @ Dec 8th 2006 11:11AM
I'm 36 and just old enough to have had a run in with some sort of souped Corvair back in high school. I thought I was pretty fast in my 72 Nova with the V8/powerglide, decent BFGs, and had about mastered the limits of the car. Combined with a teenage dose of stupidity I could outrun anything if turns were involved just because the other guy was out of b@alls before I was out of car. On a posted 30mph road I knew well a primered Corvair with heavy tint pulled in behind and rode me hard despite being 20 over. I went up 15 more and heard him get on it. Must have been straight pipes, wailed like no V8 I had ever heard. A hard (gardrail and sign) left hander was approaching, and I knew exactly how fast I could take it without getting too sideways and hitting the rail. It was about 25 over the limit. I braked late & hard and made it through after getting about 15 degrees 'extra angle'. I looked in the mirror to see if Corvair had slowed or wrecked. He was still two car lengths behind, he did not even get loose. I took the next right (hard) but the Corvair blasted on straight.
One thing I did notice as the Corvair went the other way: Padding. On the roll cage.
I never saw that Corvair again in our smallish (200Kpop) town, or even another with this body style. I have had a wanted one ever since. Primered of course.
Frustrated Consumer @ Dec 8th 2006 11:15AM
Shows that a lie repeated often enough becomes 'the truth.'
The fact is that Nader didn't even come close to killing the Corvair, the ground swell behind the Mustang did. Which is a shame 'cause the '65 redesign was a real nice car...
Bruce Schug @ Dec 8th 2006 11:33AM
Great RR! Yes, Corvairs are alive and well! My '67 140 will still blow away anything similar in an autocross. I used to do pretty well in E/SP against the ponycars, but with their 300-400 hp and 335 tires I just can't stay with them anymore. But if they had 170 cu in like my +.060 Corvair it'd be a different story.
There's still nothing better looking than a late-model ('65-'69) Corvair, whether it's a coupe, convertible or the handsome 4-door hardtop.
But the best part of modern Corvairing may be the following it has. CORSA, the Corvair Society of America, has about 5,000 members with dozens of local chapters. Our club, CORSA South Carolina, has monthly meetings and events. We have a great time driving, showing, racing and talking about our cars.
Visit the CORSA web site at: http://www.corvair.org for more about Corvairs. Live your boyhood dreams with a car you can afford!
Bruce
David Thompson @ Dec 8th 2006 11:42AM
The first turbo Corvair came out in 1962, along with the Oldsmobile Jetfire and its cantankerous alcohol injection system (aka Turbo Rocket Fluid). The second-gen Corvair borrowed its rear suspension from the C2 Corvette, and was GM's last use of an independent rear suspension in a four-place car until the Cadillac CTS.
J @ Dec 8th 2006 11:58AM
Actually the 88 W Bodies i.e Grand Prix, Cutless Supreme, Regal came with an independant rear suspension in fact they used a transverse fiberglass leaf spring like a Corvette
Richard Warren @ Dec 8th 2006 12:03PM
Bob, the one I had would get 20 to 22 mpg if driven well, but fact is it begged to run, even so got about 18.
vaporloc @ Dec 8th 2006 12:07PM
I own the ultra rare 66 Corsa Turbo Convertible. Last year for corsa and the turbo, 585 were built and 68 are known to exist on the corsa registry. These are termendously fast little cars. Very fuel efficient(if you stay out of the turbo) and handle very nice.Chevrolet should consider building them agian with upgraded materials and computers.
John P. @ Dec 8th 2006 12:09PM
The fact is that Nader tried like an idiot to do so. How about the Space Shuttle Ralph, or the Saturn V rocket? Are those unsafe? The 60's really were the golden age for American cars as far as I can tell. I Imagine the evolution of the corvair for 2006 would be special indeed.
bauhaus @ Dec 8th 2006 12:27PM
Well, John P., let's be honest about the space shuttle. Of all of the space shuttles ever built and flown in space (five - I don't count the Enterprise test platform), two of them have been destroyed in flight, resulting in the deaths of 14 crew members. Other than aboard space shuttles, no American astronauts have ever been killed in flight, and only three have died (the crew of Apollo 1, killed in a launch-pad fire).
Grossly off-point, to be sure, but let's keep the record straight about the space shuttle. Basically, it's a DC-9 strapped to an enormous tank of high explosives, with two roman candles on the side for good measure.
bauhaus @ Dec 8th 2006 12:38PM
But the Corvair is beautiful....
Ian Harding @ Dec 8th 2006 12:49PM
Sweet. I had a 63 Spyder that was the most fun to drive of any car I have ever owned. When the turbo kicks in it just pulls and pulls harder and harder until you get scared and let off the gas. Totally different feeling from a naturally aspirated rig, and sounds awesome.
John P. @ Dec 8th 2006 2:05PM
Bauhaus, sorry, point well taken.
My point was, that when something is "dangerous" it shouldn't stop us from advancing, trying new things, and moving into the future, rather than cowering and giving up. It just kinda bugs me that we have become so safety conscious that someday about the only thing left is to sit in some safety bubble and be fed through intravenous.
Maxzillian @ Dec 8th 2006 2:09PM
I have to say that I never gave these cars much thought until I finally raced against on at an autocross in my '87 Starion in ESP. If he hadn't hit a cone during his fastest run, our splits would have been .001 seconds! Definitely a great handling car that likely would have whooped my butt if he wasn't having issues in the corners with his carburetors.
Hats off to GM for trying something against the grain way back when.
Asten @ Dec 8th 2006 4:08PM
While i'm sure it's still a great car - i thought I'd point out that the pictures are around 10-15 years old, or the NE license plates are woefully out of date ;)
Richard Warren @ Dec 8th 2006 4:23PM
#16 Back then GM tried a number of new ideas on it's compacts. Tempest, engine front transmission in rear felxible drive shaft, Buick aluminum engines, Olds liquid injection which #7 already spoke to.
the DAD @ Dec 8th 2006 4:26PM
I belive the imortal John Fitch used to do mods on these outta his shop in CT ??? It was called the "Spyder" !!! Had a 60 sedan and it ran forever, you just had to keep tools and a spare (or 2) fan belts in the trunk !!!
corsa @ Dec 8th 2006 5:00PM
#17: Good eyes. That main pic is from about 10-15 years ago. But that is the best pic I ever took of the car.
You can see more recent pics of my Corvair (still a few years old though -- it wears historical plates now), including an engine pic and an interior shot, here:
http://www.motortopia.com/corsa/cars
Just click on the picture of my Corvair and you will find a photo album on that page.