Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
Reader Spy: Chevy Volt caught on set of Transformers 2
Spy Shot: Production interior of Chevy Volt (maybe)
Rumormill: Lexus LF-A... Stillborn?
Ford reveals 2010 Mustang badge
REPORT: Chrysler may sell Dodge Viper rather than kill it
In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Nissan Murano
In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Dodge Journey R/T
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Jeep Compass Sport 4x2
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Porsche Carrera S
First Drive: 2009 Honda Fit Sport
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this threadCadillac unveiling long-wheelbase DTS in L.A.
(Page 1 of 1)
Guenther @ Nov 17th 2006 10:14AM
To all you nay-sayers: If you're gonna ride around in a big luxury sedan, you want a BIG luxury sedan. Just because YOU don't want one, doesn't mean there aren't plenty of people who do. If I was to decide between a regular and an extended version of the 300 or Caddy (the lincoln is just too anemic), I would pick the lwb model hands down. Its only logical to do this streach for the car-service market. Lincoln has it. Chrysler has it (although its very pricey). The big advantage the caddy has is that through its FWD lay-out, it has a much flatter foot compartment, which makes sliding accross the back seat much easier. While it would be easiest, I don't think the streach will be all door, since this makes it tough on the structure and for one whonkin' huge door.
SLS- I suppose there shouldn't be any reason not to offer this, unless some of the crash worthiness was compromised in the change (china doesn't have the same requirements, as I recall)