<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for Cadillac unveiling long-wheelbase DTS in L.A.</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/16/cadillac-unveiling-long-wheelbase-dts-in-l-a/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for Cadillac unveiling long-wheelbase DTS in L.A.</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cadillac unveiling long-wheelbase DTS in L.A.]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/16/cadillac-unveiling-long-wheelbase-dts-in-l-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/16/cadillac-unveiling-long-wheelbase-dts-in-l-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[.. GOOD!___  A NEEDED ADDITION TO THE LINEUP.  ONLY A DECADE OR TWO AFTER THEY FALTERED WITH THE EXTENDED LENGTH LITTLE BOXY FLEETWOOD, THEY FINALLY TRY AGAIN. AS LONG AS WE ARE ON A ROLL, HOW ABOUT THE NEXT ONE NOT LOOKING LIKE A GENERIC TAXI WITH A VERY NICE GRILLE?   PERHAPS MORE LIKE A CADILLAC, DARE I ASK?<br><br>(MY R-RATED COMMENT WOULD BE THAT, IN READING THAT THIS CAR ADDS 8 INCHES, I REMEMBER WHEN A GUY BOUGHT CADILLACS IN ORDER TO LOOK AS IF HE HAD 8 HIMSELF.....) ESCALADE BROUGHT THEM BACK SOME OF THAT. <br><br>IT IS GETTING THROUGH TO GM THAT THE AMERICAN COMPETITOR TO A GERMAN CAR IS NATURALLY LONGER, WIDER, SHOWIER.  THEY NEED THE LIVERY BUSINESS AT CADILLAC, AND THEY NEED SOME MORE CARS WHICH WILL ATTRACT THE UNDER 40s -- MOST BABY BOOMERS WATCHED THE BRAND BEING DESTROYED, AND WILL  NOT BE BACK.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BOB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2006 5:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cadillac unveiling long-wheelbase DTS in L.A.]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/16/cadillac-unveiling-long-wheelbase-dts-in-l-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/16/cadillac-unveiling-long-wheelbase-dts-in-l-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sadly, the model that needs the extra rear legroom is the STS.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cruz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2006 7:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cadillac unveiling long-wheelbase DTS in L.A.]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/16/cadillac-unveiling-long-wheelbase-dts-in-l-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/16/cadillac-unveiling-long-wheelbase-dts-in-l-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[There's one thing GM is REALLY good at.    Building cars no one asks for.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2006 7:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cadillac unveiling long-wheelbase DTS in L.A.]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/16/cadillac-unveiling-long-wheelbase-dts-in-l-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/16/cadillac-unveiling-long-wheelbase-dts-in-l-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[forget the LWB DTS... LWB STS(SLS) For the Win!!!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2006 7:56PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cadillac unveiling long-wheelbase DTS in L.A.]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/16/cadillac-unveiling-long-wheelbase-dts-in-l-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/16/cadillac-unveiling-long-wheelbase-dts-in-l-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[REPLIES<br><br>2-- As in earlier post, the STS is very likely too closely coupled in a marketing attempt that tried for a European size. Note Autoblog last week on the LWB STS shown in China. Many STS drivers seldom use the back seat, but 100% of livery drivers do, so that eight inches of stretch out room is good -- but we have not seen yet where the stretch goes, hoping it is not all in the doors.<br><br>3--If you go to New York, etc,  and see the hundreds and hundreds of livery cars, you will see the demand.<br>Of course, a Deville replacement that looked like a true Cadillac would be better, but they can stretch this Plain Jane in the middle of its life span and sell some cars.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[BOB]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 16th 2006 8:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cadillac unveiling long-wheelbase DTS in L.A.]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/16/cadillac-unveiling-long-wheelbase-dts-in-l-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/16/cadillac-unveiling-long-wheelbase-dts-in-l-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[To all you nay-sayers: If you're gonna ride around in a big luxury sedan, you want a BIG luxury sedan. Just because YOU don't want one, doesn't mean there aren't plenty of people who do. If I was to decide between a regular and an extended version of the 300 or Caddy (the lincoln is just too anemic), I would pick the lwb model hands down. Its only logical to do this streach for the car-service market. Lincoln has it. Chrysler has it (although its very pricey). The big advantage the caddy has is that through its FWD lay-out, it has a much flatter foot compartment, which makes sliding accross the back seat much easier. While it would be easiest, I don't think the streach will be all door, since this makes it tough on the structure and for one whonkin' huge door. <br>SLS- I suppose there shouldn't be any reason not to offer this, unless some of the crash worthiness was compromised in the change (china doesn't have the same requirements, as I recall)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Guenther]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2006 10:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cadillac unveiling long-wheelbase DTS in L.A.]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/16/cadillac-unveiling-long-wheelbase-dts-in-l-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/16/cadillac-unveiling-long-wheelbase-dts-in-l-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[I work in the financial district (Wall Street) in Manhattan.  There is a need for these cars, thousands of them.  When I use a car service, I do like a car that allows me and my companion(s) to be comfortable.<br><br>The DTS however, should be put out of it's misery. It has such a matronly look about it, fattish older woman in ill-fitting suits with sensible shoes.  The SLS is the car that they should build to replace it.<br><br>  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr_Oak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2006 11:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cadillac unveiling long-wheelbase DTS in L.A.]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/16/cadillac-unveiling-long-wheelbase-dts-in-l-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/16/cadillac-unveiling-long-wheelbase-dts-in-l-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[---Guenther Wrote:---> SLS- I suppose there shouldn't be any reason not to offer this, unless some of the crash worthiness was compromised in the change (china doesn't have the same requirements, as I recall)<br><br>There is some truth to that, watched a documentary on this.  They are employing some really archaic safety standards, Late 60s to mid-70s.  I guess over time, they'll catch up.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr_Oak]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2006 12:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cadillac unveiling long-wheelbase DTS in L.A.]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/16/cadillac-unveiling-long-wheelbase-dts-in-l-a/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/16/cadillac-unveiling-long-wheelbase-dts-in-l-a/</guid><description><![CDATA[I wouldn't waste my time with this livery silliness because it's only relevant to cities and the cab market. They should have put a large Buick up against Lincoln, because real luxury shouldn't be banging around getting abuse from city potholes at 100,000 miles/year! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 17th 2006 1:19PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>