Seat Leon Cupra offers more for less than the GTI
Brands within the VW Group umbrella seem to need better coordination because they just keep stepping on each other's toes. This time it's not Volkswagen and Audi marketing competing models, but Volkswagen and Seat, the company's Spanish marque.
Seat's models are by-and-large based on Volkswagens, but, like the models from Czech subsidiary Skoda, are generally priced below the equivalent VWs. The Seat Leon is based on the VW Golf, and each has their sportier version: Golf has the GTI and Leon has its Cupra. The trouble for Volkswagen is the Cupra is more powerful than the GTI, and hits the British market (for reference) at £400 less than its German sibling.
Volkswagen may not subscribe to the "race on Sunday, sell on Monday" theory, but meanwhile Seat has been cleaning house in the touring cars (especially in England). Based on their racing expertise, Seat has managed to squeeze an extra 30 horses out of the 2-liter turbo four that powers its Leon Cupra and the GTI. Unlike the three-door GTI, the 237-hp Seat is a five-door hatch and reaches 100km/h (62mph) in 6.4 seconds. Also part of the Cupra package are 18" rims with red calipers peering through, a sport-oriented cockpit and the option of that wonderful DSG dual-clutch transmission.
With the added aggressive styling (which is, admittedly, a matter of taste) and the Seat Leon Cupra makes for a tempting alternative for GTI buyers across the pond.
Related Items:
- SEAT officially unveils the new Leon Cupra
- SEAT Leon Cupra uncovered!
- New SEAT Leon Cupra headed to British Motor Show
[Source: Motor Authority]
Get a WordPress.com Blog
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
stirling 10:51PM (11/13/2006)
damn, I wish SEAT would re-launch in Australia already :'(
Reply
carbuzzard.com 11:13PM (11/13/2006)
If the suggestion is that VW should reign in Seat, I think that would be a mistake. Look what happened to GM when they went generic.
Reply
chewy 1:28AM (11/14/2006)
Looks nice. Performance is there as well.
Reply
BOB 12:59AM (11/14/2006)
VW can simply get more money for VW badged cars, for many reasons, so the logic of the article is lacking, to me.
I look at the car above and wonder why we don't have something like it here in the US, with a GM, Ford, or Chrysler badge. Closest is the Chevrolet Aveo, a rather primitive looking Daewoo (or Daewon't-lol) and the larger, also kinda crude, but cool, Dodge Caliber.
Probably costs too much to bring in a low end European car here, due to the George Bush Dollar.
Reply
Grajeda 12:59AM (11/14/2006)
the difference between a Cupra and a GTI is huge.
Maybe the Cupra is cheapest, faster, and more powerfu; but the GTI is a legend... Is one of the best cars in history.
When you see a GTI on the street you know the driver could buy a better car, but you have no doubt he buy a GTI because he want a GTI!
Reply
ruggels 1:14AM (11/14/2006)
ummmmm... the GTI will receive a 30ish hp boost as you guys have reported, for their anniversary edition. Audi's already seeing a performance increase with the new software as well, vw's just a little slow on the uptake because they'd like to hold it until the anniversary edition to make it seem more special then the stock GTI. Furthermore, VW/Audi has been clear that they planned to position seat as a more sporty brand, this fits in nice with that strategy.
Reply
Emre 1:34AM (11/14/2006)
I admit GTI is the logical choice, but I have driven Leon FR, which has the same 200 HP engine config as the GTI and FR wins for the fun value. It has stiffer suspension, better steering response...; simply put, sportier setup. OTOH, GTI is still too civilized for my taste.
All in all, if you are a petrolhead with a family, GTI should be the choice. However, if you are not bothered by small quality glitches and feeling bumps on the road; Leon wins hands-down.
Reply
robbieL 2:07AM (11/14/2006)
have to agree, the FR is the much better drive than the Golf...and thousands cheaper. Have put off purchasing until I can check out a Cupra and see if its worth the extra over the FR
Reply
ruggels 2:08AM (11/14/2006)
the more i look the more i like this car. especially the shaved rear door handles... though i'm wondering what the torque is on it, with 240 hp at the crank and 280 torque I hit sixty around 6.7 in the jetta, with crapptastic launches, and 160mph isn't an issue... but that 6.4 impresses me.
Reply
Gav 4:28AM (11/14/2006)
As a note, the DSG hasn't been announced for the Cupra yet.
Reply
Dave T 7:47AM (11/14/2006)
And don't forget there is a 4-door gti now.
Reply
Brian 8:44AM (11/14/2006)
Absolutely. The Seat offers more poor interior materials for less.
There's a reason it's cheaper than a GTI.
Reply
leo 9:27AM (11/14/2006)
And it looks a hole lot better too
Reply
icerabbit 9:40AM (11/14/2006)
For each size of car (compact, ...), you can get a 'barebones' VW or a mid level SEAT and still pay less for the SEAT.
My little SEAT, with the exact dimensions of a Golf, had the interior fittings of a Polo. Nothing wrong with that. In fact they are a big hit.
My only major issue was a first generation water based paint job, which plagued some brands incl SEAT. Other than that a pretty neat car ... which I'd pick any day above US & Korean econo offerings.
Reply
yeahright 9:54AM (11/14/2006)
What's the big deal? If, as you say, it's £400 cheaper, that's hardly worth worrying about. If someone wanted a GTI, would they really take a Seat instead to save £400???
Reply
Ron R 12:45PM (11/14/2006)
At least you guys get a choice. I wish we had the Seat cars. Living in America gives you a choice between a GTI, a Chevy Cobalt or a Dodge Caliber. The GTI is so overlooked and under-rated here in the states but because of that it gives you the "different factor". I drive an Audi A3 S-Line. It's a very, very rare car here in the sunshine state.
Reply
fernan 1:16PM (11/14/2006)
i think its the perfect strategy, the enthusiasts will keep on buying gtis and the ones that are not sure will buy seat. VW has made a lot of money off of the SKODAS ehich are cheaper jettas and passats.
Reply
icerabbit 12:55PM (11/14/2006)
That small of a difference does seem odd indeed.
In my case, admittingly >10 years ago by now, the price differences were pretty big. We're talking 1000s of Euros or Dollars of difference in base price for a comparable level of equipment/features. For instance you could get an upper mid level iBiza 1.8i with electric windows, sunroof, fog lights, etc vs a barebones VW Golf manual everything 1.4 liter. Or a fully tricked out Ibiza GTI vs either a decent (but smaller) VW Polo or a slightly upgraded VW Golf.
Can't say what the current situation is though, as I haven't been in Europe for a while and I haven't kept track of their car prices.
Reply
TechRightGuy 1:24PM (11/14/2006)
(At #3)
Historic Exchange Rates, from the Federal Reserve's web page. How many (Yen or Euros) can you buy for one US dollar. I am selectively reporting only two currencies, as the bulk of imported cars are therein reflected:
Yen:
2-Jan-01 114.7300
13-Nov-06 118.1400
Euro
2-Jan-01 0.9465
13-Nov-06 1.2810
I'm just saying.
Reply
Greg A. 7:28PM (11/14/2006)
#19: For the Euro, it's the other way around: That's the value of one Euro in U.S. dollars, not vice versa as you wrote. Therefore, the value of the dollar vs. the Euro has decereased 26% in the time period you show.
Reply