Autoblog Project Garage: Axle swap, Part IV

One of the goals of the Autoblog Project Garage posts is to give our readers some insight into the scope of various projects, including a sense of the amount of time it might take to complete a job given our usual variety of distractions. As a case in point, the first post concerning a rear-disc conversion on a 1996 Buick Roadmaster (don't laugh - it's much faster than it appears) took place nearly two and a half months ago, and we're just now wrapping things up with the install of an axle that we rebuilt (see the second and third posts for more info).
So, with that being said, let's crawl underneath the car, remove the old drum-brake axle, and slide in the freshened Impala SS rear axle with its 12" disc brakes, lower gearing, and limited slip diff.

Note that in subsequent pics, the tires are still on the axle. For some reason, I had it in my head that I could leave them on and simply roll the axle out from under the car. Of course, I didn't have the rear of the car raised enough to do this, and so I should have simply removed the tires at this earlier point.





Without a doubt, this was the single worst part of this project.
Not shown is the cutting of the parking brake cable, as the adjuster was frozen after a decade of winters and we had no patience left for it.





At this point, the axle can considered to be officially removed from the vehicle.
I don't recall what the large pair of Channel-Locks were used for, but I'm sure it had something to do with the two hammers that are also lying about.
At this point, it's time to start the installation process. Remember, every fastener that goes back on the vehicle should be coated with either anti-seize or threadlocker (especially in any areas subject to underbody corrosion). 
We installed new bushings in a set of repainted upper control arms, so those go on the vehicle first as this is the best time to access the front set of bolts. Keep these fasteners a couple of turns from fully tight for now.
From this point on, you'll notice that we've cleaned up the undercarriage a bit. More on that in a later post. 
New shocks were in order for this wallowing whale, so Monroe's robust Severe Service shocks were purchased. They're the same length as the stock Roadmaster shocks, so the axle will still drop down far enough to remove the tire from behind the fixed fender skirts. 
Using the new hardware supplied with the shocks, we attached the upper mounts (it's far easier to get a wrench on top of the frame to hold the backing nuts when the axle is out of the way). 
With the shocks now in place, we hold the upper control arms level with the vehicle and tighten the bolts. Ideally, this wouldn't be done until the axle is in place and the vehicle is back on the ground, but it's rather difficult to access these fasteners at that point. This, we feel, is a reasonable compromise. 
Instead of fitting new bushings to the Roadmaster lower control arms, we used some leftover Impala SS parts. This will allow a rear sway bar to be fitted at a later point, after we upgrade the front suspension (yes, the Roadmaster left the factory with no rear bar to assist the pillow-soft springs).
The lower control arms are attached to the frame, but the bolts are kept just loose enough to keep the arms from flopping all over the place when we try to line up the axle. 

... it's balanced on the jack and rolled into place under the vehicle. This is another moment where a second set of hands is rather helpful.








With the springs in place, jack up the axle to its approximate normal ride height, and torque all of the control arm fasteners to spec. This ensures that the control arm bushings will be clamped in the proper position. If the fasteners are torqued with the axle at the full droop position, the bushings will be excessively twisted once the car is lowered to the ground, and the ride will suffer (as will bushing life).


And with that, the project is nearly complete. Obviously, we need to bleed the brakes, and for that it is helpful to either utilize a pressure bleeder, or to at least jack up the axle such that the bleeders are closer to the high point in the system (which is the line between the axle and the frame). Then give all of the fasteners a once-over, reinstall the tires, drop the car off the stands, and take an appropriately gentle test drive.
The speedometer still needs correction via PCM programming to accommodate the new rear axle gears, but that's a straightforward task that can be accomplished via DIY software, or one of the many mail-order programmers.The brake pedal now has a properly firm feel, and the car stops hard, straight, and true. Why drum brakes have stuck around this long, we simply don't know, but we're definitely happier with a decent set of discs at each end of any vehicle.







Get a WordPress.com Blog




Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Greg 1:09PM (11/09/2006)
I yearn for the days when General Motors re-introduces rear wheel drive cars.
The 91 - 96 RoadMaster, Caprice and Oldsmobile Custom Cruiser Wagons where works of art.
They also delivered up to 27 mpg on the highway with a 5.7 V8.
Reply
Phil L. 1:42PM (11/09/2006)
Great writeup - thanks for sharing this project. The new brakes look awesome.
Question: Were any master cylinder or proportioning valve changes required as part of the drum to disc conversion?
Reply
Classic Car 2:47PM (11/09/2006)
Great job on documenting your work. I'm book marking and using your tips on my next project.
Reply
Eric Bryant 3:06PM (11/09/2006)
Phil,
No proportioning valve changes are "required", as all of the B-bodies used the same prop valve regardless of rear brake type. Now, this yields a 95/5 split with rear discs, so at some point (likely when I do the front brakes and need to bleed the system anyways), I will be doing the "stealth bolt" mod that involves eliminating a spring and valve from the prop valve and yields a 70/30 brake force distribution. I did this to my Impala SS several years ago and it made quite an improvement in stopping performance and pedal feel.
Reply
Phil L. 3:13PM (11/09/2006)
Eric -
Sounds like a good move. Thanks for the info!
Reply
Scott C 3:31PM (11/09/2006)
I'm struggling with a B-body project. Anyone know of some good sites for knowledge on the B-body cars? Specifically a 1995 Caprice Police Package? Any help is appreciated.
Reply
&$% 5:01PM (11/09/2006)
No actual pictures of the joke in question? I wonder why... oh well at least you can try to have a serious discussion, hmm?
Reply
Battlebotsrob 4:51PM (11/09/2006)
www.9c1.com has lot of good links.
http://www.impalassforum.com/ also has a good user base.
I grew up in a 91 buick rodmaster, and put 100k miles on a caprice wagon. If i could find another one in decent condition, at reasonable cost, I would have it in my driveway.
Reply
Rob 5:09PM (11/09/2006)
What is the point? I could understand if this was an impala SS, but it isn't. Roadmasters have horrid handling, not much power at all, and are only exciting to geriatric people almost ready for a coffin.
Reply
gary 6:43PM (11/09/2006)
nice write up, but what was the actual total cost of this axle swap to get disk brakes?...shipping alone on that axle had to be over $200.
Reply
Eric Bryant 9:13PM (11/09/2006)
"I could understand if this was an impala SS, but it isn't. Roadmasters have horrid handling, not much power at all, and are only exciting to geriatric people almost ready for a coffin."
Well, let's see - I already own an Impala SS, so buying another isn't extremely interesting. The Roadmaster also shares almost all of its running gear with the Impala (included the exact same 260HP LT1 engine), so getting it to keep up with an Impala is a simple matter of upgrading springs, shocks, bushings, sway bars, and tires. Do all of this and it's not like the car will hang with an M3, but it'll still be quick enough on expressway ramps to wipe the snotty grin from the faces of a few folks who just think that they've got a faster car.
Gary,
Good question on the total project cost. The axle was $350, I paid $80 to ship it via truck freight, and then I sunk about $300 into miscellaneous things like new bearings, seals, control arm bushings, and brake parts. Figure that I spent about $500 more than simply refreshing the old drum brakes. The pedal feel alone is worth the expense.
Reply
Zipper 9:17PM (11/09/2006)
Rob,
The point is the RoadMONSTER is THE SAME CAR as the Impala SS, INCLUDING THE ENGINE. The differences are lots of cosmetics, rear axle brakes and diff, springs, and shocks. The Roadmonster is the ultimate sleeper. Minor modifications can make it outrun and out-handle the SS. But more importantly, both can embarass the mullet right off many a Mufftang driver!
When the '94 came out with the LT1, I think it was Car & Driver dressed up one one their editors like an old grandma including pillbox had with veil, gray wig, shawl, and white gloves. They had him hunched up-close behind the wheel of a Roadmonster sedan with smoke POURING off the whitewalls. Absolutely hilarious. I forget the tagline.
Reply
rodan32 1:08PM (11/10/2006)
Very cool, Eric. Keep these up! I also enjoyed the Impala posts you've had in the past.
Reply
Pixel 4:24PM (11/10/2006)
4-wheel disc is a beautiful thing. Even if you don't care about performance, not having to deal with repairing drum brakes makes it worth it (I have a scar on my lip from where a set of brake pliers slipped and bashed me in the face).
Course my 'toy' still has its stock '62 drums all around. Someday...
Reply