Ford designer says Fairlane will look almost identical to concept
In an interview with Ward's Auto, Ford's chief creative officer (CCO?) and VP of design, J Mays explains that the similarities between the concept and the production versions of the Fairlane are profound. So much so, that some employees at FoMoCo can't tell the difference between the two.
The Fairlane seeks to bring an air of luxurious practicality to the people mover segment and considering the amount of growth Ford sees in the CUV segment, hopefully it fill the niche comprised of ex-SUVers and minivan refugees.
As we've already reported, Fairlane badging will not make it to production, instead, a yet-to-be-disclosed name will likely be announced in the next few months. Ford's newer crossover-van thingy will be built at the automaker's plant in Oakville, Ontario, Canada, along with a rebadged Lincoln version.
[Source: Byron Pope/Ward's Auto]
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 9)
Paul 9:07AM (11/02/2006)
i am guessing no suicide doors will be a big one.
Reply
JB 8:59AM (11/02/2006)
I'm glad this is making it to production. The name is Ok for me, Fairlane was used on cars, but it fits the F naming convention (who cares about that really), and hopefully Ford hasn't lost Fairlane trademark status like they did with Futura (see Pep Boys).
But, they will probably use some other name for it that doesn't make sense, time will tell.
Reply
Eric B 9:04AM (11/02/2006)
I hope they keep the concave ridges on the doors; for some reason, those lines make the whole design for me.
Good on Ford for being ahead of the curve on dumping minivans in their current forms. Keep it low to the ground and put a decent engine in it. Big-stroke 4.2 liter V8 anyone??
Reply
northstar 9:05AM (11/02/2006)
"Rebadged Lincoln version"
Yup, Lincoln is now Mercury. And Mercury is more pointless than ever. And that is saying something. Blah.
Reply
ron 9:06AM (11/02/2006)
This is a good move on Ford's part! At this point they need to be a bit daring and build something unlike everyone else. Hopefully they will make the interior flexible enough so it can be used as more than a people hauler. I'm thinking a flat floor with the 2nd and 3rd row seats (if equiped) folded down like my Sable wagon.
Reply
DC_1 9:24AM (11/02/2006)
I must be the only one that thinks this thing is ugly!!
Reply
Phil L. 9:16AM (11/02/2006)
The Fairlane looks like it can be a winner for Ford - but as a current Windstar owner, I have a hard time seeing it as a minivan replacement.
I've been pleased with my 2000 Windstar LX: It's been a competent, reliable (yes, early Windstars were noted for tranny and head gasket issues) hauler for us. No, it doesn't have a Honda/Toyota reputation - but our (used) Windstar was far more affordable. Even used, Odyssey/Sienna were simply out of our price range (3 kids will do that to you).
The Fairlane's third row appears to be an afterthought - but I would need it on a daily basis. With the third row in use, rear storage is pathetic. I can used all three seating rows in the Windstar and still have stroller/cooler space left over in the rear.
One place I suspect the Fairlane won't be able to rank with the minivan crowd: The Windstar/Freestar models are well-noted as decent vehicles for towing small to mid-size trailers (we tow a 2500 pound GVWR popup camper with our Windstar; the combination drives very well, even in fully-loaded-family mode). Yes, people who want non-SUV/truck towing platforms are a niche market - but one that Ford is leaving behind. The Freestar with 4.2l and F-150-related transaxle internals is particularly noteworthy in this area.
Sadly, one can point to a time when Ford had great opportunity in the minivan market - but didn't take it. There was a brief moment in the late 90s when Honda hadn't yet introduced the redesigned Odyssey, Chrysler transaxle horror stories were legendary, and other models simply hadn't found the formula yet. If Ford had quickly moved beyond early reliability problems - and added the second sliding door instead of the stop-gap extra-long driver's door (beating Chrysler to the punch), it could be a different minivan world today.
I understand why Ford is giving up on minivans, and know that few will miss the Windstar/Freestar - but I hope the lessons were learned and will be applied elsewhere.
Reply
sirAQUAMAN64 9:27AM (11/02/2006)
Nope, I think it hideous too. And to me, the only thing that car replace a minivan is... a minivan.
Reply
noub 9:48AM (11/02/2006)
besides this fairlane product, ford should also sale the european ford galaxy.
I know that has been studied here in europe (import the new mondeo, the S-max and the galaxy)
Reply
CJ 9:34AM (11/02/2006)
I doubt the Ford doesnt have a stranglehold on the Fairlane name. Anyone that's been to Dearborn would attest to that. Why they don't want to use it on the production vehicle is another question... probably a decision from the marketing people. Too bad... I like it.
Reply
jim 9:37AM (11/02/2006)
....if it comes half-decent; some leather and a moon roof .. then I'm an Early Adapter. Don't cheap it up with the usual crapo plastic and mouse-fur carpets you put in my Escape!
jim
Reply
CrunchyCookie 9:41AM (11/02/2006)
"Fairlane will look identical to concept"
...and identical to Freestyle in concept.
Reply
Piter 9:47AM (11/02/2006)
Ford is fooling themselves if they think this is a proper Windstar replacement. Its an SUV, anyone can see that except for their marketing people.
This has Pacifica written all over it.
Reply
lavardera 9:55AM (11/02/2006)
I don't get it either - what is the difference between the fairlane, freestyle, and edge vehicles. They all look like squat explorers with different grills and trim?
Reply
Scott 10:07AM (11/02/2006)
14.I don't get it either - what is the difference between the fairlane, freestyle, and edge vehicles. They all look like squat explorers with different grills and trim?
The Fairlane is a 3 row vehicle as is the Freestyle. They have the most overlap out of the three. The Edge is a 2 row vehicle thats smaller and more "sporty" then the two previous vehicles. I'd say the Freestyle might go away once the Fairlane comes out, unless they can differentiate the two more.
The Fairlane will appeal to people who don't want a Minivan, but don't want to give up Minivan convenance. Its also alot more stylish then a minivan and doesn't have any of the stigma that Minivan has
Reply
Hab's 1 11:33AM (11/02/2006)
Re #7 by DC_1
Ugly applies to :
1- Toyota Previa
2- Honada Element
The Failane does have style and looks. The Honada and Toyota are just plain ugly.
Cheers
Reply
Phil L. 10:28AM (11/02/2006)
> Its an SUV, anyone can see...
Well - In my book, it's not an SUV just because it looks the part or fits in a particular market segment - it's an SUV only if it can walk the walk.
First place I look: Towing capacity. Yeah, most people seem to use SUVs as cars - but I look at what it can take with it. If you aren't in the 5000+ area, it's not really an SUV.
The Pacifica fails on this point, too.
FWIW, there are many folks (particularly Canadians) who have learned that Windstar/Freestar models can tow well beyond the published 3500 pound limit. Curious? Read:
http://www.rvlifemag.com/file343/hitchhints343.html
http://www.canamrv.ca/content.asp?id=12
Reply
laserwizard 10:33AM (11/02/2006)
I'm not in the market for a vehicle, but I'd buy the "Fairlane" in a heartbeat. I do want a vehicle that is as roomy as a van, has the characteristics of an SUV with seat height and boxiness, but don't want the poor fuel economy. I want to buy American. I also want something different than what is out there. I'd buy a Honda Element but it is wimpy even though I love the room (though I hate the interior) and most of the exterior styling cues. This is precisely the car that bridges the gaps of being just car enough to be nice to ride in, just truck enough to haul stuff, just minivan enough to carry people, and just SUV enough to do it all.
The interior on this vehicle will make or break my actual buying decision. Thankfully, Ford is doing the best job of any domestic manufacturer in this area and I'm sure that this one will be no exception.
Way to go, Ford! That is one bold move redefining the minivan market right out from underneath the Jap's noses and making every other minivan look instantly 1985.
Reply
Mike Homeniuk 10:49AM (11/02/2006)
Isn't this just a Freestyle with squared-up Range Rover/Mini-esque styling cues? Seems like quite a bit of overlap here.
Reply
mes 10:52AM (11/02/2006)
Just plain ugly..... This thing reminds me of the old VW rabit days... Down right uggggggggly...
Reply