<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for Chrysler's SEMA surprise: 392 HEMI Dodge Challenger Super Stock</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/30/chrysler-s-sema-surprise-392-hemi-dodge-challenger-super-stock/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for Chrysler's SEMA surprise: 392 HEMI Dodge Challenger Super Stock</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Chrysler's SEMA surprise: 392 HEMI Dodge Challenger Super Stock]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/30/chrysler-s-sema-surprise-392-hemi-dodge-challenger-super-stock/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/30/chrysler-s-sema-surprise-392-hemi-dodge-challenger-super-stock/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think they may have pushed the retro envelope a little too far on this car.  The stance and paint really look out of place on a modern muscle car (even if it is pretending to be an original.)<br><br>I can appreciate what they were trying to accomplish, but the end product looks confused and out of sorts.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Max]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 30th 2006 7:16PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>