Scratch that: Chrysler Group definitely not for sale... maybe

When speaking on behalf of a group, it's in everyone's best interest to have a common 'message' agreed upon before addressing others. This didn't seem to be the case yesterday, when rumors of DaimlerChrysler selling their latter, less profitable, half began circulating.
DaimlerChrysler's CFO, Bobo Uebber was quoted during a conference call saying that, "We need to safeguard sustainable profitability for the Chrysler Group and for Daimler-Chrysler. We don't exclude anything here."
As the day wore on, media speculation grew along with the automaker's stock price, prompting a statement from Hartmut Schick, Senior VP of Corporate Communications, which said in no uncertain terms that Chrysler is "not for sale."
The Auburn-Hills, MI-based group expressed its dissatisfaction with the results as well, but not quite as drastically as the comments made from Germany. Chrysler's CEO, Tom LaSorda made it clear that, although the third-quarter results were unacceptable, changes will be made to address inventory gluts and to lower costs.
[Source: Detroit News]
Read the press release after the jump.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Jake 9:39AM (10/27/2006)
The continuation of the very positive earnings trend at the Mercedes Car Group, the distinct increase in operating profit at the truck group as well as the financial services' operating profit, which is above the high level of earnings in the prior-year quarter, only partially compensated for the loss contributed by the Chrysler Group.
Reply
gbh 6:48PM (10/27/2006)
Ahh, the numbers obsessed Germans.
They should have been fixing MB quality instead of 'merging' with Chrysler.
Continued ownership of Chrysler is as bad an idea for MB, as it was to buy it in the first place. Management styles and corp cultures are far too different.
With few minor exceptions, it hasn't been good for either of them.
Reply
Bill 10:36AM (10/27/2006)
The continuation of the very positive earnings trend at the Mercedes Car Group, the distinct increase in operating profit at the truck group as well as the financial services' operating profit, which is above the high level of earnings in the prior-year quarter, only partially compensated for the loss contributed by the Chrysler Group.
Reply
Mike Razpezdaev 11:36AM (10/27/2006)
Look we know Chrysler has been losing money, but only two years ago Benz has been the money loser while Chrysler has been the bread winner.
By the way from national stand point of view, that would make Chrysler independant again, they again would be an Ammerican automaker, so most on autoblog.com can start woooowing and oooozing over Chryslers vehicles such as Serbing and Interpid and call Toyota kind of recalls even thou Chrysler is by far #1 as far as recalls go.
Reply
ramsport47 3:56PM (10/27/2006)
toyota recalled more cars in 2006 than anyone else...get your facts straight
Reply
Frank 4:15PM (10/27/2006)
Serbing and Interpid??? What are those, cars from the former Yugoslavia?
Reply
Sean 7:17PM (10/27/2006)
The problem is they have some seriously bad Chris Bangel like people developing cars. I remember a few years ago the Dodge Durango and Dakota were two of the sportiest looking trucks and SUV's around, now they are just Hideous. Speaking of hideous, what about the Jeep Compass! What's sad is the original Concept Compass which looks nothing like what the production model, was actually pretty cool.
Even the new JK Wrangler with the plastic Grill hand me down parts and huge plastic fenders is not a nice as the TJ. Solution, don't want poor sales then don't make ugly vehicles! It would also help if they stopped putting the same parts in all of their new models. That's why GM failed.
Reply
Glenn 1:33AM (10/28/2006)
The partnership is really paying off finally. I can't see them changing directions now; it would be a train wreck for both companies.
Reply