http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/ Autoblog Comments for http://www.autoblog.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.autoblog.com en-us Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/Oct 27th 2006 5:54PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/Oct 27th 2006 5:57PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/Oct 27th 2006 6:03PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/Oct 27th 2006 6:18PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/
The "don't get too close" expression of the two guys in the background indicate that they would agree with me.]]>Oct 27th 2006 6:55PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/Oct 27th 2006 7:00PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/Oct 27th 2006 8:02PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/]]>Oct 27th 2006 8:51PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/
Low-hanging air dams are likely to be torn up in normal driving and don't help air flow at anything close to legal speeds.
All that plastic, carbon stuff, or whatever makes the car look front-end heavy and out of balance with the rest of the design.

I'm beginning to think that when I see SEMA in one of these posts, there will be a photo of a car that looks worse than how it was designed in the first place.

People who actually buy this crap might not realize how silly their SEMA'd up car looks in the mall parking lot.

]]>Oct 27th 2006 8:53PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/AAAA HAHAHAHHAHAHA
AAAAAAAAAAA HAH HA HA HA AHHA
Pathetic
HA HA HA HA HA HAAAAAAA!!!]]>Oct 28th 2006 12:44AMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/Oct 28th 2006 12:45AMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/
But what confuses me, is that if the "new" 4.0 is a bored out 3.5, how come it will only produce 5 more hp in the Pacifica? ]]>Oct 28th 2006 2:13AMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/
Posted at 8:01PM on Oct 27th 2006 by &$% 0 stars
I'm curious to know which 2 door they modeled this after???

I saw a silver 07 Sebring the other day. Talk about hideous. And only 253hp/262 ft-lbs of torque from 4.0 liters? And people were tearing apart Ford for their 3.5. I know American engines are aimed more towards torque than hp...

But what confuses me, is that if the "new" 4.0 is a bored out 3.5, how come it will only produce 5 more hp in the Pacifica?

first of all it's the 3.5 that puts 253hp is Sebring trim, and the 4 liter puts out only 5 more hp in the Pacifica because that's how chrysler tuned it for that particular car. They wanted more torque, not necessarily more hp.
]]>Oct 28th 2006 8:48AMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/
NO..if you LOOK at the picture, they are stamped into the hood...Chrysler never "paints" on effects...even my Neon SXT with the SRT design package has a functional hood scoop on it]]>Oct 28th 2006 9:01AMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/Oct 28th 2006 11:21AMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/
http://www.rsportscars.com/foto/04/stilimited07_011600.jpg]]>Oct 28th 2006 1:05PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/
253hp/262ft-lbs from the 4.0l in the Pacifica is pretty pathetic. GM gets that performance out of their 3.6l V6, which is actually a really nice engine. 285/295 isn't all that bad if thats what the SEMA-bring 4.0l will have, but I wonder how refined of an engine that will be.]]>Oct 28th 2006 2:33PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/
The faux-tripod projectors are a nice touch--gives it that subtle retro touch with a modern take. Get the front bumper a little higher and you have what should've been the production model. A shame.]]>Oct 28th 2006 3:04PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/Oct 29th 2006 9:11PMhttp://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/http://www.autoblog.com/2006/10/27/nutha-sema-sled-chryslers-sema-sebring/Oct 30th 2006 10:20AM