Filed under: Car Buying, Economy, Chevrolet, Honda, Kia, Nissan, Saturn, Toyota
Testing a full slate of cheap cars
They miss the Yugo, godblessum. Those wacky guys at Slate long for the days when a new car could be had for less than the price of a modern television set. Surveying the bargain basement offerings of the automotive world, they found that only the Chevy Aveo can be had for under 10 grand, let alone the four thousand bucks a Yugo stickered for 20 years ago. Even at an adjusted-for-inflation price of $7500, the Yugo GV earns its initials and indeed represents a Great Value. Well, you get what you pay for. Anyway, Slate rounded up a field of econoboxes for a brief comparison test to see what you can realistically expect at the bottom end of the scale.
Slate's Seth Stevenson, an admitted cheapskate who drives a '96 Saturn with 103,000 miles on it, laments the fact that the lowest rung of the car market actually spans $12,000 to $17,000 nowadays. But what exactly do you get for that much cash? More than some might guess in a few cases. Mainly in response to escalating gas prices, several automakers have brought thrifty new models out to make the bargain hunters happy. Slate tried out the Saturn Ion, the Kia Rio, the Nissan Versa, the Scion xA, the Toyota Yaris, and the Honda Fit. When he went in to rent a Chevy Aveo, the counter agent told him, "You do not want to drive that car." So he skipped it. We don't want to spoil the rankings, but after trying cars that were too boring, too jerky, and even too flashy, he finally found one that was a perfect fit. Click through for the car-by-car reviews.
Thanks for helping us fill our slate, smj!
[Source: Slate]
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
T-Raveling 5:20PM (10/17/2006)
I have the Nissan 350Z and The Honda Fit as a daily driver. I love both cars because no matter where I go people tell me they love my car. The sport fit has great zip and is able to handle the biggest of trips to home depot. Great article.
Reply
DriftPunch 5:25PM (10/17/2006)
My father had a cheapie Ion (~$14,000) that I adopted for a while. It had no steering issues, but it did suffer the take off issue that he is describing. It felt like it was taking off in the wrong gear, perhaps 1st is extra tall. Once you got past take off, it was much more peppy than one would expect. For the 2 months I had it, I got 34 mpg, and from a guy who hasn't gotten more than 21 (4Runner & GM trucks) in years, that was very cool. I got used to the center guages in a few days, and didn't think anything more of it.
Of the steering issue, one has to ask, was the reviewer's defective, or was my fathers uniquely stable.
Based on his review of the Ion, I tend to think his review of the others are dead on too...
Reply
D Man 5:43PM (10/17/2006)
I like the Nissan Versa, it is quite roomy as the clever commercial shows. The Yaris is a piece, friend has one and the door handles just fell off as we entered the freeway. HOna Fit looks like a clown car!
Reply
Jimmy 5:54PM (10/17/2006)
Listening to the rental counter agent for car advice !!? They always try to up sell customers to a larger more expensive car! They very likely didn't even have an Aveo in stock. I've always rented the 'economy' class and I've always been upgraded for free because they didn't actually have the Aveo/Metro.
The bad thing he should have mentioned about the Aveo is the poor fuel economy. EPA 24/34 for the tiny automatic hatchback! Consider a V6 Impala gets 21/31 and you can realize just how bad the Aveo's economy is!
Reply
Andy 6:13PM (10/17/2006)
My mother owned an L300 and it served her well for the two years she had it.
Reply
Corey W. 6:30PM (10/17/2006)
"When I inquired about the Aveo at a rental counter, the woman there said, "You do not want to drive that car." Good enough for me.)"
Sorry dude, just that one line make me think the author is full of sh*t!! If you're doing an unbiased comparison, what the h*ll does the rental agent have to do with it?!?!? Are you comparing the best cars recommended by rental agents?!?!?
Reply
Greg A. 6:38PM (10/17/2006)
"Even at an adjusted-for-inflation price of $7500, the Yugo GV earns its initials and indeed represents a Great Value."
But to be sold now, it would have to have a frontal airbag for the driver and another for the front passenger, a tire pressure-monitoring system, lower emissions, and who knows what else. I'd say that the airbags and the tire pressure-monitoring system alone would make that Yugo GV cost more than a base Aveo.
Reply
Rob 6:47PM (10/17/2006)
if i was "forced" to pick something out of all those cars i'd definitely get the Fit too. i've heard nothing but good reviews about it and the Sport version is actually pretty attractive for a little hatchback. and i figure that if the rental car agent was that adamant about the author not renting the Aveo, I figure they had good reason to do so....I've personally never had someone bad mouth a car like that unless they have something to back that up with!
Reply
Yvo 6:48PM (10/17/2006)
shouldn't this also be filed under Scion?
Reply
Charles Navarro 6:53PM (10/17/2006)
I have an Aveo as my daily driver. You know what, it's not too bad as long as you don't ride the redline and have the 5-speed manual. The automatic was a dog. At least it's faster than the Honda Element it replaced and gets better fuel economy (I average 27 mpg and have gotten 30 mpg). If it had the ability to adjust timing and fuel delivery for higher octanes, it would do better. It's made to run on piss. Fit and finish for a cheap car is damn good. I too second the rental agency didn't know what they were talking about. Did I mention the steering and pedal feel aren't over boosed either!
Reply
ezautodealers 8:32PM (10/17/2006)
Cheap cars in price or cheap cars in quality.
Reply
Alvin 11:18PM (10/17/2006)
I'm in agreement with the others... The review does not achieve its stated purpose. Supposedly it is to review the cheapest of the cheap - then he skips out on the cheapest!
If they miss cars like the Yugo GV, then they needed to test the Aveo no matter how bad it was. Because if you want cheap, you want cheap. That was the philosophy behind the GV - why not the Aveo?
(caveat lector - I'm hardly an Aveo fan.... but if you're going to say cheap... you should follow through).
Reply
David J. 11:44PM (10/17/2006)
Now, do any of the cars come with power or AC standard?
I have no credit as I'm 19, and my folks aren't willing to cosign yet, and my current car, despite being a 10 year old beater still turns heads ('96 Ford Taurus owned by some elderly people with low, low miles when purchased).
Since I can't really be "trusted" finanically... my payments will be high, and too bad, because if I am going to pay over 300 a month for five years, the car better be fully loaded...
Better save up some more money.
Reply
Jimmy 12:03AM (10/18/2006)
If they really wanted to see the cheapest car to own, they would use the Edmund's "True Cost to Own" data:
http://www.edmunds.com/apps/cto/CTOintroController
So far I have not been able to beat a Chevy Aveo "Special Value" Hatchback in rural Virginia for $0.30 per mile TCO. The same car in southern California would jump to $0.38!
Reply
Phydeaux 1:14AM (10/18/2006)
The article has me wondering why not the Aveo and why he is so easily swayed. At under 10 grand it's the least expensive (the motivation behind the article), and at the $15 grand mark he could have had a decked out Aveo with leather seats and 6 disc changer! The Toyota and Scion should go in a lower category with their bad crash ratings... I want cheap, but not at the cost of my life.
Reply
M. 2:56AM (10/18/2006)
Ever taken a ride in a Dacia Logan? A nice little car made by the Romanian part of the Renault/Nissan Alliance with parts from Nissan and Renault. The car starts at about 7200€ in Western Europe, including 16% VAT. This are about 7700$ (without VAT) if the car was sold on your side of the ocean. There is even a small common rail Diesel available that is rated at about 57MPG highway use.
Do not expect this car in the US too soon, but Mexicans might be able to buy it, if Renault should decide to replace the aging Nissan Platina (which is actually an old Renault Thalia) with a Nissan model based on the Logan.
http://www.daciagroup.com/
Reply
rlopees 9:27AM (10/18/2006)
While it's worlds better than a Yugo, the Aveo didn't HAVE to be in this test. It was skipped because this wasn't a scientific test, merely a satire site blogger driving some cheap cars and giving his opinions. If people don't see the humor in having the rental agent warn a driver not to take it, then I feel sorry for them. And it wasn't like they talked him into something else, he ended up walking away rather thn drive it. Now THAT'S funny.
Reply
Brandegee 11:21AM (10/18/2006)
#5: The Saturn L300 was built on a platform adapted from a Saab 9000, I think. It's not even close to the same thing as an Ion.
#2: I never drove an Ion, but rented a Cavalier autobox with an Ecotec 2.2 that had dreadful tip-in. Once up to speed, though, it had enough torque for passing. It reminded me of a V6 Celebrity but with with better handling.
As for the article, the guy skipped a few other "cheap" cars. The Hyundai Accent is a big seller and likely on a lot of people's lists. Last one I drove was buzzy and miserable, though. And the Focus ZX3, which is more in the same category as the Ion as opposed to the subcompacts, is cheap, too... our local dealership is offering it for little over $11K. The ST is wayyyy overpriced, though. Suzuki makes a bunch of penalty boxes, too.
Reply
Richard Warren 2:04PM (10/18/2006)
"When I inquired about the Aveo at a rental counter, the woman there said, "You do not want to drive that car." Good enough for me.)"
Typical rental car up sell, it's what they get paid to do. God, wish that person would walk into a sales room and be told, "no you don't want that car, you want this one"
Reply
epilonious 12:26PM (10/19/2006)
I dunno. I was referred this article by a friend... and I was appalled at the execution. He completely left out the Hyundai Accent which is pretty much "the Kia Rio with the refinement he so craved". It seemed to me like he desperately wanted a Honda back in the day and couldn't afford it or justify it's higher cost over his Saturn... was saddened as the Civic kept creeping higher in price and size, and jumped on the Fit like it was made just for him because Honda decided to actually make a cheap subcompact again.
It read more like a reversed Honda pamphlet than a car review article.
Reply