![Bugatti Bird-gate Followup: Driver identity revealed <b>[*UPDATE:</b> Now with actual crash video!]](http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/11/bugatti-veyron-swim-1258147199_143x85.jpg)
EEStor ceramic electric motor
Alternative-fuel engines of different sorts all suffer from one major drawback or another: poor range, hard-to-find filling stations, high cost, poor performance. EEStore is out to change all that with a revolutionary new kind of "battery". We put "battery" in quotation marks because the unit doesn't store power in a chemical capsule like a conventional battery, but instead uses some kind of glass- and aluminum-coated ceramics. The inventors are understandably tight-lipped on the way their creation works, but they're adamant it could completely replace the internal combustion engine.
Feel Good Cars, the Toronto company responsible for the ZENN, wants to get the unit on the road by 2008. The most significant benefit would be its efficiency: a car powered by the EEStor unit could run on the equivalent of 45 cents per gallon, driving 500 miles on $9 worth of electricity after just five minutes to charge.
We could tell you this invention could be the fix for our addiction to foreign oil, but that's scary talk for gear-heads. So we'll tell you about the performance instead. The company's CEO insists that "a four-passenger sedan will drive like a Ferrari". That's a tall order, but if he's right, the prancing horse could find itself grazing on greener pastures.
(Thanks to Robert for the tip!)
[Source: CNN]
Get a WordPress.com Blog
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Leo 6:54PM (9/21/2006)
I never figured it out, why companies insist on making electric cars ugly (except the Tesla)
if they looked better adn more like a regular car, i bet you people would take more notice than thee ugly things theyalways show us.
IMO - the oil industry is paying them off to come up with ugly designs to keep people from getting interested in them.
Reply
Lee Gibson 6:18PM (9/21/2006)
Wake me up when they've got some numbers, or some science, to talk about. Until then, it's all marketing.
Reply
pavster 6:14PM (9/21/2006)
It's either a capacitor or a scam. I vote scam.
Reply
rem83 7:07PM (9/21/2006)
Let's see, at about 9 cents/kwh, that's 1000kwh of storage. 1000kwh/5 minutes = 12000 kw, or 12 MW. I'd like to see the charging station that can provide 12 MW of power to a vehicle in a safe way. This has got to be total BS.
Reply
JC Whitless 6:31PM (9/21/2006)
"some kind of glass- and aluminum-coated ceramics"
Translation
Static Power
Generates a static charge between the plates, and as you drive it slowly agitates the surfaces to create mini lightning.
Now the neat part is, whenever you bump into a wall, the car automatically backs up and then turns right, before going forward again at full speed
Reply
Jeff Banks 6:36PM (9/21/2006)
Hmmm... my theory is that its a big wind up car with a big aluminum spring.
Reply
arnie 7:11PM (9/21/2006)
Has to be an ultra capacitor. Lots of research going on in that area right now. Maybe they have come up with something new but it sounds too good to be true.
Reply
arnie 7:14PM (9/21/2006)
They'll need to have a nuclear power plant attached to the charging station. Or an ultra-ultra capacitor!
Reply
AutoFan 7:37PM (9/21/2006)
My daddy always told me there are three kinds of liars: Liars, damn liars, and battery engineers.
I'll hold on to my investment dollars for now.
Reply
Gary Hyslop 7:57PM (9/21/2006)
I read a while ago about a company that had come up with a new type of capacitor that instead of having flat internal plates had millions of micro-threads which greatly increased their capacity (because of the increased surface area). If this is a practical application of that, they could really be on to something.
Reply
Poe 10:44PM (9/21/2006)
Well, it certainly sounds too good to be true, but here's to hoping.
Reply
Thunder 11:29PM (9/21/2006)
rem83
I think you miscalculated.
9 cents per kwh = 900 cents ($9.00) per 100 kwh, not 1,000.
So the amount of power delivered would be 1,200 KW in 5 minutes or 1.2 MW. I don't know what this means in terms of gauge of wire required or amount of amps drawn. If someone with an electrical background would comment though I'd appreciate it.
Reply
Jim 8:32AM (9/22/2006)
First thing I thought it might be is flywheel technology.
http://www.discover.com/issues/aug-96/features/reinventingthewh842/
Reply
BJ 10:46AM (9/22/2006)
Lots of followers in here, no leaders that's for sure.
Reply
mo 11:06AM (9/22/2006)
1200 kW where Power = Voltage * Current; we know the power, and voltage in the US is 120 V. So I = P/V -> I = 1,200,000/120 = 10,000 Amps. Sounds like BS.
Reply
DP 1:15PM (9/22/2006)
EEStor is working with ultra capacitor technology and the actual charge time I've heard is 15 minutes to a full charge
Reply
Rory 6:57PM (9/22/2006)
Holy Grail Batman.
Reply
kf4yfd 10:39PM (9/22/2006)
Follow up to - rem83 and mo:
Amperage is measured per second. In your calculations you forgot to divide the Kwh measurements by the time factor.
So, 10,000(amps) / 5(minutes) / 60 (seconds)
comes out to 33.3 amps or 6 gauge wire.
:)
Reply
Apeweek 12:31AM (9/23/2006)
Here's some more reading on EESTOR.
http://thefraserdomain.typepad.com/energy/2006/01/eestor_ultracap.html
http://tyler.blogware.com/blog/_archives/2006/3/29/1849708.html
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1141599010468&call_pageid=970599109774&col=Columnist971715454851
They are supercapacitors, operating at about 3500 volts. At that voltage it would take about 150-200 amps to charge them in a few minutes. This is doable with 2/0 wiring, common in electric vehicles.
Reply
Eric 12:06AM (9/23/2006)
I'd like to know plug you need to plug in to in order to pull $9 worth of electricity in just five minutes. Nonsense!
Reply