<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for Ford Mustang rumors for 2009 and 2012</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/20/ford-mustang-rumors-for-2009-and-2012/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for Ford Mustang rumors for 2009 and 2012</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Ford Mustang rumors for 2009 and 2012]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/20/ford-mustang-rumors-for-2009-and-2012/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/09/20/ford-mustang-rumors-for-2009-and-2012/</guid><description><![CDATA[A Falcon based Mustang should mean IRS for the entire range.  IRS on the EA169 platform (Falcon, Futura, Fairlane) has to be less expensive then the DEW98 (LS, S-type) so there's no discernible reason to reengineer  for a live rear axle. Here is a nice CAD of what the Falcon is currently using.<br><br><a href="http://www.themustangnews.com/tech/st-0706_ozirs.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.themustangnews.com/tech/st-0706_ozirs.htm</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 20th 2006 6:15PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>