• Aug 31st 2006 at 12:01PM
  • 20
That didn't take long, did it? Apparently Aston Martin is a hotter brand than we thought, as CAR online is reporting that two European luxury good firms, neither with experience in the automotive industry, are both interested in the marque. Swiss-based Richemont, who you might know by its Cartier brand of French jewelry and watches, and French holding company LVMH, best known for its Louis Vuitton and Fendi brands of luggage and hand bags, are the two companies that could potentially pay up to $1 billion or more for Aston Martin.

The eventual buyer is going to get the Aston Martin name, the company's factories at Gaydon and Newport Pagnell, the entire R&D team and the brand's management including CEO Ulrich Benz.

[Source: CAR]

I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.

    • 1 Second Ago
      • 9 Years Ago
      If either get Aston it will be interesting to see if they can rely so much on their suppliers for development that they do not need the R&D resources that a mass market auto company can spread across its brands.

      A lot of marketing, advertising and posturing, heavy focus on seasonally changing designs, and Chinese sweat shop manufacturing might not work as well for cars as it does for purses, at least not yet.
      • 9 Years Ago
      DJ is right!
      • 9 Years Ago
      The automotive industry behaves so much like the fashion industry that it's surprising that there isn't a greater overlap between them.
      • 9 Years Ago
      BMW is a good idea. I also thought about Toyota. What does Louis Vuitton or Cartier know about running a car company. They might be able to make better interiors, but it would probably be the same old Aston Martins. BMW and Toyota both have the money and are well run companies that build quality cars, but I think Toyota would do more with it.
      Toyota doesn't have a sports car brand. Aston Martin's are hand made, but Bentleys are supposed to be hand made too. You don't hear people complaining about their Continental GT's. Toyota would make Aston Martin into a beast. It can be had for about $1-2 billion. Toyota probably spent more than that developing the Camry. If Toyota doesn't do this they are retarded. This wouldn't cost them 2% of their market cap, and they could make Aston Martin even more profitable than Lexus is within 10 years. Toyota should buy at least a stake in the company and let Louis Vutton buy part of the company too. Toyota's quality, Louis Vutton’s style. Wow.
      Toyota would have to start making V12’s, but on the other hand, they would have bought their way into the world of Ferrari, Porsche, and Lamborghini, which that Lexus GT might not be that succesful at.
      • 9 Years Ago
      Lamborghini is owned by VW and it is barely profitable, but the same thing could be said for VW. There is more to making a profitable company than selling expensive cars. You have to sell alot of them at a lower price than what it costs to make them. It helps to be well managed. There are only so many companies that are well managed, BMW, Toyota, and Porsche are the most well run companies in the world. Each of those companies has the benefit of being both profitable and being considered the best at something. Right now this is not true of Aston Martin right now, but if either of those companies were to buy Aston Martin with being the best at something as a goal.
      • 9 Years Ago
      "Why did Ford think mass producing an Aston Martin was a good idea?"

      Hey, Adam, study history: Aston Martin is profitable now for the FIRST TIME IN ITS ENTIRE HISTORY (which dates back to the early 1920s). It's always been a money-losing rich man's plaything/labor of love. Now it's a thriving company. Doesn't that seem like a good idea?
      • 9 Years Ago
      My money's on BMW buying Aston Martin. Only upside for them on this. Gives them another, yet slightly lower priced, British ultra-luxury marque to go with Rolls. Gives them a state of the art manufacturing facility that specializes in aluminum construction. And best of all, gives them a true Porsche/Lambo/Ferrari fighter.
      • 9 Years Ago
      If I was part of the Aston Martin leadership I'd be begging to be acquired by BMW long before a host of other would-be buyers. They have the deep resources from skilled people to immediate capital to the racing devotion to ensure the brand doesn't die.

      It would be a shame, for example, if another Russian millionaire bought them up like TVR was.

      I think the suggested $1B US price is amazing - who would ever pay that much for a low volume automaker even with a sterling reputation? Yes their designs are fresh now, factory is updated and tools/stamping et al is modern so the new owners *could* delay massive investments.

      Still it would many decades, without a single more dime invested, before the new owners even get a portion of that back. Keep in mind VW paid a fraction of that for Lamborghini, then pumped in over a hundred million and now will make (profit) just a bit over a million a year.

      Hey if buyers [including the fashion companies] are that hot to buy a luxury auto brand why not snatch up say a DeTomaso SpA for next to nothing? Or offer $50M for TVR, thus giving the tyke an easy exit from owning the money losing company.
      • 9 Years Ago
      Inside word is that CEO Ulrich Bez is planning a management buyout of Aston Martin. Bez is likely to front a consortium bidding for the luxury sports car maker.

      However Ford's decision to put Aston Martin up for sale may just be a disguised invitation to tempt a stronger car maker into an alliance and get some external support for its recovery noted a Global Insight automotive analyst.
      • 9 Years Ago
      BMW should take over and get Chris Bangle to design the new Aston complete with ultra high tech i-Drive system.
      • 9 Years Ago
      Aston makes a profit. a tiny one, but that means it's earning its keep. its KEEP...

      unlike the rest of ford.

      it would be a dumb dumb move to sell aston martin. I feel like Ford wants to be free of extraneous drivetrains or something.

      With the LS and thunderbird dead, Land rover, jag, and ASton are the only ones using the 3.9-4.4-small displacement v8s. DEw98 that was formed for those cars only lives on in the S-type and the severely divergent mustang. So those bonds are already broken. These ties that go more than skin deep are faltering... Ford I think is trying to avoid the bmw-esque production post-sale cooperation BMW had to endure when it sold Land Rover to Ford, leaving the Ford-owned RR with BMW drivetrain and associated parts and suppliers, as well as when BMW was supplying drivetrains for the Silver Seraph and Arnage "green label" after it lost the rights to both.... Amazing that BMW bounces back from such setbacks. Maybe the purchasing bodies in those transactions didn't mind having someone else "building" their cars for them, but can you imagine someone taking ownership of Jaguar and keeping the 3.0L v6 in a few of those models, or keeping the S-type or X-type at all?

      I think aston is safe... I think pretty much everyone thinks those are solid...
      • 9 Years Ago
      Thats actually brilliant, and why not?

      If LMVH or the like bought Aston, why not an Italian boat company someday and even a private jet concern? No one knows the rich better than those who sell to them exclusively.

      I could see a non-auto manufacturer buying into this, however I hope they understand the labor costs involved in producing bespoke luxury automobiles. An Aston V12 is not a Louis handbag and cant be produced for cheaper in the Phillipines.
    • Load More Comments