Nissan has revealed details about its next-gen V6 engines, which will first appear in the 2007 Nissan Skyline / Infiniti G35.The 3.5L VQ35HR and 2.5L VQ25HR feature new blocks and a host of new key components. The highlights of the engines' improvements are a 7,500 RPM redline (up from 6,600 on the previous-gen VQ), a 10% increase in fuel economy, and a SULEV emissions rating.
The VQ35HR (pictured at right), as applied in the '07 G35, will be good for over 300 horsepower, but Nissan has yet to divulge an exact number. In Japan, the '07 Nissan Skyline will be available with both the 2.5L and 3.5L engines, as was previously the case. The last-gen VQ25 made 210 horsepower -- a number that will undoubtedly go up with the introduction of the VQ25HR. There are currently no known plans to use the 2.5L V6 in North America.
Key specs of the new VQs are listed in the press release after the jump, and Nissan also released audio of what the VQ35HR sounds like, which you can stream by clicking here.
The release of the details surrounding the new powerplants has prompted enthusiastic discussion over at the FreshAlloy.com forums, where Nissan/Infiniti fans have also posted some X-Ray-type shots of the 2007 G35/Skyline's new intake and exhaust systems.
Thanks Jason for the tip!
(Press release after the jump)
[Source: Nissan via FreshAlloy.com forums]
NISSAN DEVELOPS NEW-GENERATION V6 ENGINES
--Engines to power all-new Skyline to be released this autumn--
TOKYO (Aug. 22, 2006)--Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., has newly developed two new-generation six-cylinder V-type engines for front-engine, rear-wheel-drive vehicles featuring powerful performance and improved environmental friendliness.
The 3.5L VQ35HR and 2.5L VQ25HR engines will be built at Nissan's Iwaki Plant in Fukushima Prefecture and will be equipped in the all-new Skyline to be released this autumn in Japan, as well as the US where the model is sold as the Infiniti G35.
Featuring newly designed engine blocks and other key components, the engines offer smooth transition to top-in-class level engine speed of 7,500 revolutions per minute drawing upon the "smooth transition" concept of the popular VQ engine, the only engine in the world to appear on Ward's 10-Best Engines list for 12 consecutive years.
The engines achieve a 10% improvement in fuel efficiency compared to vehicles equipped with the existing VQ engine and top-in-class Super Ultra-Low Emission Vehicle level emissions. SU-LEVs have 75% or less nitrogen oxide (NOx) and hydrocarbon (HC) emissions than those stipulated by Japan's 2005 exhaust emission standards.
The letters "HR" in VQ35HR and VQ25HR stand for "high revolution" and "high response."
Nissan began VQ engine production in 1994 and has produced a cumulative total of 5.5 million units as of last fiscal year, ended March 31, 2006.
Main specifications of the VQ35HR and VQ25HR engines:
Smooth transition to top-in-class level engine speed of 7,500 rpm
* Reduction of weight and friction through adoption of asymetrical piston skirt configuration
* Reduction of piston-side force through lengthening of con rod
* Addition of rudder frame, newly-designed cylinder block with significantly improved rigidity
Thrilling revving sound and top-in-class output
* Adoption of perfectly symmetrical intake system
* Adoption of continuously variable valve timing control (CVTC) for intake side and electromagnetic valve timing control (e-VTC) for exhaust side
* Reduction of intake resistance through adoption of symmetrical twin intake system and straight intake port
* Adoption of isometric exhaust manifold and perfectly symmetrical exhaust system
Improvement of fuel-efficiency and emission cleanliness
* Reduction of friction through adoption of world's first hydrogen-free, diamond-like carbon (DLC) coating
* Adoption of catalyst substrate with ultra-low heat mass, super-ignition iridium spark plug and fast light-off O2 sensor control













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
epilonious @ Aug 23rd 2006 9:20AM
So, any plans on when this new VQ will be making it into the Maxima/Altima/350Z/FX35/Murano/Frontier/Xterra/Quest and perhaps a new Sentra type-ZOMG?
Keep in mind, this is the company that managed to wedge and older VQ into the rear of a Nissan Micra concept to scare the RenaultSport Clio V6.
Mike Rolls @ Aug 23rd 2006 9:24AM
I wish Nissan would use the 2.5L six in the upcoming Sentra SE-R.
Dr1v3r @ Aug 23rd 2006 9:28AM
Over 300hp from a nat. asp. 3.5 V6. Fantastic!
Meanwhile Ford is still making engines for their 'Stang with these numbers:
Engine Type 4.0L SOHC 12V V6 4.6L OHV 24V V8
Horsepower 210 @ 5250 300 @ 5750
Torque 240 @ 3500 320 @ 4500
Bold moves aint gonna cut it with numbers like this.
Joe @ Aug 23rd 2006 9:38AM
To be fair Ford's numbers do only require regular fuel to reach those numbers...
Eso @ Aug 23rd 2006 9:55AM
I don't know if a 10% bump in fuel economy is going to be enough. Every vehicle with the current VQ35 engine has pathetically uncompetitive fuel economy.
Chance @ Aug 23rd 2006 10:11AM
Dr1v3r,
Do me a favor a look into the cost differential of Ford's 4.0 liter V6 and Nissan's 3.5 V6. I believe you are going to be a little surprised as to how much more the Nissan engine costs.
ku @ Aug 23rd 2006 10:12AM
pretty sure the engine has been rated at 306hp, same as the is350. i cant find any official releases stating that, though, but that's what they're saying over at leftlanenews
http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/07/27/2007-infiniti-g35-sedan-rated-at-306-hp-sae/
Araemo @ Aug 23rd 2006 10:15AM
#3 and #5 are making similar points but I'm not sure they realize it.
There is only so much energy in fuel, and gasoline engines are only so efficient at turning it into rotating energy. Nissan is making more powerful, more fuel-hungry engines. Ford is making less powerful, less peckish engines. It is a trade-off. That said, I'd rather have the 3.5L V5 than the 4.6L V8, but some people would go the other way.
The V8 gets 17/25 Mpg(City/highway) and
The V6 gets 19/25 Mpg.
The V8 is specced to 300/320 hp/lb-ft.
The V6 is specced to 300/260 (Or 287/274, for autos)
If Nissan pushes the power closer to 310/270 or higher, and increases fuel economy to 21/27(Which would be a 10% increase over the current VQ35's)... it's going to look mighty tempting.
That said.. if you don't want 300 hp, buy the less powerful V6 and save on gas. If you want 300 HP, buy the powerful V6, or the average V8, and pay for more gas.
Lucas Zaffuto @ Aug 23rd 2006 10:20AM
"I don't know if a 10% bump in fuel economy is going to be enough. Every vehicle with the current VQ35 engine has pathetically uncompetitive fuel economy."
In a trip from Baton Rouge LA to Buffalo NY and back I averaged 30mpg(regular 87) for the entire trip (including lots of city driving around Buffalo lest you think it was all interstate) in an Altima 3.5 SE. I also routinely get 26mpg(premium 93) average in my 350Z. How is that non-competitive? Or are you just pulling numbers out of the air from cars you have never driven and have no experience with? If you're using the EPA figures, they tends to underrate the VQ35 series engines for fuel economy, as many Nissan owners can testify to. The VQ35s get much better gas mileage than the smaller VQ30 I had in my old Maxima, in which I used to average 22mpg(premium 93). No doubt it is because of better electronic controls, and amazing considering how much more power the VQ35s have.
"Over 300hp from a nat. asp. 3.5 V6. Fantastic!
Meanwhile Ford is still making engines for their 'Stang with these numbers:
Engine Type 4.0L SOHC 12V V6 4.6L OHV 24V V8
Horsepower 210 @ 5250 300 @ 5750
Torque 240 @ 3500 320 @ 4500
Bold moves aint gonna cut it with numbers like this."
Agreed. Ford needs to stroke that new 250hp 3.5 liter to 4.0 liters and stick it in there ASAP. Better fuel economy and power more deserving of the Mustang name. They will probably never do it though, because it would take sales away from the GT. Of course, they could always move the GT up in price a little bit and massage it to add 20-30hp...
Whydrive @ Aug 23rd 2006 10:24AM
Who cares about Nissan. It's all about Toyota. Have you test driven the new 2007 Camry SE? Wow, talk about the ultimate sports sedan. Blows away anything Nissan, Honda, or Mazda has to offer.
AR @ Aug 23rd 2006 10:29AM
And while the rest of the auto industry is moving ahead, GM is still extolling the "virtues" of its ancient 3800 pushrod V6.
Jp @ Aug 23rd 2006 10:35AM
I've never been that impressed with Nissan's 3.5 V6. For example take the 350Z with 300Hp. Their are a number of other 'sports' cars (Sti, Cayman, S2000, Boxster, IS350, C350 sport) with similar power to weight ratios putting down better performace numbers than the Z. Has this engine been over rated? I know gearing plays a big role. Maybe it's just not getting the power to the rear wheels. The bottom line is...the 350Z should be a faster car with a 300Hp "award winning" engine.
John Treloff @ Aug 23rd 2006 10:40AM
I can see why the Mustang V-6 would be brought into this discussion, but the 4.6 V-8?
Since when has Ford tried to market the 4.6 V-8 as an efficiency queen?
I guarantee you that the additional torque that the V-8 produces, along with it's lower powerband, and it's lower octane appetite make it a much more enjoyable engine on the street. Not to mention it is dead nuts reliable, and a silky smooth performer.
The interesting thing to see if Ford has a clue will be whether the premium versions of their 3.5 make the kind of power the VQ does. Everything is in place that they could do this if they wanted to, but knowing Ford they will settle for 2nd, 3rd, 20th place?
Stoneman @ Aug 23rd 2006 11:03AM
I love the G35's engine. That V6 sounds great. I hope they put a turbo in the G35 one day. Someone has already, a twin-turbo G35 puts out 480 bhp and the single turbo 380 bhp.
Stoneman
http://www.stonemanautoreview.com
CL2 @ Aug 23rd 2006 11:16AM
Yes, Ford needs to put their new V-6 into the Mustang with either 6-speed auto or a manual tranny. The time has come to make the committment. Leave the old 6 in for the absolute bottom of the line models and rental fleet. Like the regular gas vs premium.
Tommy @ Aug 23rd 2006 11:28AM
GM has been making strides with its engines. The all-aluminum VVT 2.4L Ecotec is a nice engine.
My big manufacturer powertrain rankings (efficiency, refinement are key... trend in brackets):
1) Toyota (rising)
2) BMW (same)
3) VW/Audi (rising)
4) Nissan/Renault (same)
5) Honda (falling)
6) GM (rising)
7) Hyundai/Kia (rising)
8) DCX (same)
9) Subaru (falling)
10) Ford/Mazda (same)
jfrolang @ Aug 23rd 2006 11:32AM
#10- You're saying a Toyota is the ultimate sports sedan?? I'm not gonna deny that it's quick, but you need some personality, and even more importantly, handling, to be a sports sedan.
Camries are sprung too softly, and are much too pedestrian to qualify as 'sport.'
Calvin Cheng @ Aug 23rd 2006 11:34AM
The Nissan VQ35 is a nice engine, and the VQ35HR sounds even better. However, I doubt it is as smooth as the BMW N5x-series of I6 engines, or as free revving as the Porsche M97 H6 engines, although these attributes seem to be the highlights for the new design. I wonder how much one of these engines go for since there appears to be some interests in swapping those engines into other vehicles.
http://wheeltalk.fancal.net/?p=638
Now price, engine weight do come into contention.
http://wheeltalk.fancal.net/?p=634
The LS2 engine on my C6 has almost twice the displacement of the BMW M3's 3.2L I6, but it's barely heavier and no less fuel economical. It's also most likely far cheaper to make, and definitely far cheaper to buy at $5000+ mail order. It isn't as free revving, and the constant pushrod drone is probably a no-no for a luxury car.
The Ford 4.0L SOHC V6, it was probably designed to be built very cheaply to high tolerances, so I don't think it should be compared with the VQ35.
James @ Aug 23rd 2006 11:37AM
tommy-are you coming up with that from your own knowledge/experiences? or is there some outer place that you are sourcing those from?
because that post means nothing to me without something to back it up.
Saluki @ Aug 23rd 2006 12:48PM
I have an 05 G35 with a 3.5L VQ in it. I'm not going to deny, this thing sucks gas like there is no tomorrow. In city driving (without a heavy foot) I'm BARELY able to get 16mpg. On pure highway driving with cruise set at 75 I may bet 21-22 if I'm lucky.
The power is fun when you need it, but I have more fun in my S2000 which gets in the mid 20's