Filed under: Concept Cars, Sedans/Saloons, Chevrolet, GM
BREAKING! It's really official now - GM's Wagoner confirms Camaro production

Autoblog's Erin Mays is on-site at the auto industry's annual Management Briefing Seminars this week, and she reports that General Motors CEO Rick Wagoner announced Thursday, "As evidence that we're not completely brain-dead, GM will build the Chevy Camaro." A fully brain-functional Wagoner posed with a red version of the concept car for the obligatory photo-op (above).
Production of the Camaro will begin in late 2008, and the much-anticipated car will hit showrooms in early 2009, presumably after a massive debut at the '09 Detroit Auto Show.
Not much new, but here are the highlights:
- RWD with independent rear suspension
- V6 and V8 versions, manual and automatic transmissions
- styling will closely resemble the concept car
- asked about a droptop Camaro, Wagoner would only say, "It will come in many shapes and sizes."
- no comment on a possible Pontiac Firebird version
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 5)
Eddie 12:28PM (8/10/2006)
Early 2009... seems so far away.
I want this
Reply
Christian J 12:28PM (8/10/2006)
Greeeat. And only 4 years too late. Even better than trying to catch up to the original mustang.
Bunch of jokers.
-C
Reply
laserwizard 12:34PM (8/10/2006)
The owner looks like the dog.
Reply
Jason 12:42PM (8/10/2006)
Hmm, will GM be able to afford to build cars by 2009?
Reply
jim 12:43PM (8/10/2006)
excellent...by the time this thing is released we'll all be lusting after Smart cars because of the 5.00/gal gas.
Right On Time.
No...they're not brain dead...nope
Reply
Ross 12:43PM (8/10/2006)
Put a bowtie on a wheelbarrow and watch 'em line up, money in hand.
Reply
Scot S. 12:43PM (8/10/2006)
On the phone with my dealer as we speak. I'm in!
Reply
JRoane 12:46PM (8/10/2006)
I'm not a GM basher but some things about this Camaro highlights issues with GM. First it took a year almost after the concept was introduced to green light it. Then the green light is for two production years in the future, which is how many years behind the Mustang? It is introduced as a Chevy. On the face of it nothing wrong with that but if there are no plans for two versions and I don't know why there would be, then IMO it would make more sense to brand it a Pontiac Firebird. If Pontiac isn't the performance division, then what is it?
Reply
Ken 12:47PM (8/10/2006)
Maybe I better start growing my MULLET now, so it'll look real good when I'm ready to buy one. I'll have to start cutting all the sleeves off of my tee shirts too. Maybe grow a real thin porn like mustache. Have my girlfriend put on some skin-tight jeans and poof her hair up, with some real heavy eye liner.
Reply
JON 12:47PM (8/10/2006)
Good news.I hope this drives the morale and confidence of the GM people.Every team needs a star player or two to boost optimism.From the looks of Caddy and the quality survey that came out yesterday it looks like they could be on a roll
Reply
2009 Camaro Owner 12:52PM (8/10/2006)
As evidence that they are not completely brain-dead... GM will definitely beat their own time-line on this one. Makes me think of those early-to-market Silverado pickups! So, the convertible will be an early '10 release, but I highly doubt they will be able to keep themselves from showing it off at the 2008 NAIAS.
To: Bob Lutz
THANK YOU for working magic on another American Brand!
Reply
Gardiner Westbound 12:53PM (8/10/2006)
It's a very nice car, though I would have preferred the 2003 Chevrolet SS concept. I can't help but think the market will be nearly absorbed by the time it arrives.
http://www.seriouswheels.com/top-2003-Chevrolet-SS-Concept.htm
Reply
Chris 12:56PM (8/10/2006)
According to my neighbor who is a quality control engineer, the Camaro will probally need ever bit of the 400 hp the concept had to run with a Mustang GT. He said the platform it will ride on is quite heavy and he thought they would use a live rear axle to save weight. He said at the proving grounds in Milford that they have about four Mustangs to test and were really impressed with the live rear axle but the techology used was all patened by Ford. This car looks good and could look great if they fix that silly looking grille!
Reply
Edsel 1:02PM (8/10/2006)
LOL! - "It will come in many shapes and sizes."
Remember what happened to pony cars after the first gas crisis in the 1970's? Picture a wheezing 4 cyl, circus sized, tin box with "go-fast" decals and a 12 month warranty.
Mr. Wagoner's statement is his way of saying; "It's official today, but don't ask me tomorrow".
Reply
Mj 1:09PM (8/10/2006)
When they come out with rag top I'm in! Hey #6 Ken come out of the closet, it will set you free!
Reply
Jackie 1:14PM (8/10/2006)
'bout time GM! Now dump the GOAT and BRING ON THE BIRD!! I might consider the Camaro but I'd definately purchase the BIRD!
Reply
robino 1:15PM (8/10/2006)
Independent rear suspension would be a major factor to me if I was shopping this car against the Mustang. But that is if I would actually consider buying a Ford or a GM. I hope both manage to survive, though the Mustang has done nothing to slow Ford's decline. GM needs to offer something to all those drivers who are bailing out of their SUV's and trucks. Another nostalgic grampa's wet-dream, rental fleet, "sports-like" Mustage with a bow-tie isn't going to cut it. It will divert attention from the bottom line, but it won't change it.
Reply
Oliver 1:28PM (8/10/2006)
I can't help but think of the Italian guys with white sneakers and gold necklaces driving in their IROC-Z's in the '80s.
Hmmm.....
Reply
Drewboy 1:30PM (8/10/2006)
I think this is going to be too late to market. If gas keeps increasing, people aren't going to want to pay the gas prices that will accompany these vehicles.
Reply
CoffeeJedi 1:43PM (8/10/2006)
Idiot Redneck Out Cruzin'
or
Italian Retard Out Cruzin'
You think they'll offer a matching set of concrete blocks to put it on as an option? I'll take mine in "primer" please!
Reply