<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for UPDATE: Russian automaker GAZ says no to Jaguar</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/update-russian-automaker-gaz-says-no-to-jaguar/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for UPDATE: Russian automaker GAZ says no to Jaguar</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UPDATE: Russian automaker GAZ says no to Jaguar]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/update-russian-automaker-gaz-says-no-to-jaguar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/update-russian-automaker-gaz-says-no-to-jaguar/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mt guess is Shanghai Motors may belly up to the bar. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rene Curry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 9th 2006 9:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UPDATE: Russian automaker GAZ says no to Jaguar]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/update-russian-automaker-gaz-says-no-to-jaguar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/update-russian-automaker-gaz-says-no-to-jaguar/</guid><description><![CDATA[...so much of automotive journalism now and days is just speculation and opinions. What is "news" anymore? Ford said its reviewing its operations. Immediately autmotive journalist write Jag sale is imminent. Then they start naming buyers wthout the buyers knowledge until the buyers respond, "What?"<br><br>How about establishing Ford is selling Jag first? Remember that whole journalism thing? Confirm, reconfirm and confirm again? Or is automotive journalism pretty much supermarket tabloids for men?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shawn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 9th 2006 9:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UPDATE: Russian automaker GAZ says no to Jaguar]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/update-russian-automaker-gaz-says-no-to-jaguar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/update-russian-automaker-gaz-says-no-to-jaguar/</guid><description><![CDATA[Automotive journalism is almost an oxymoron.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CH]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 9th 2006 10:13AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UPDATE: Russian automaker GAZ says no to Jaguar]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/update-russian-automaker-gaz-says-no-to-jaguar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/update-russian-automaker-gaz-says-no-to-jaguar/</guid><description><![CDATA[... and yet, you're here to read it...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PJ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 9th 2006 12:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UPDATE: Russian automaker GAZ says no to Jaguar]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/update-russian-automaker-gaz-says-no-to-jaguar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/update-russian-automaker-gaz-says-no-to-jaguar/</guid><description><![CDATA[Jaguar is too bloated right now to be worth anything anyway. Who really wants to be saddled with the baggage of a brand aimed at higher sales when what it needs is more exclusivity and lower sales. That means not paying for the X-type which is a disaster, nor the old S-type which would need a full redesign anyway. Out of the whole thing, the only cars really worth taking with the brand are the XJ and the XK and both of them need some work to re-establish the brand.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[akatsuki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 9th 2006 12:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UPDATE: Russian automaker GAZ says no to Jaguar]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/update-russian-automaker-gaz-says-no-to-jaguar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/update-russian-automaker-gaz-says-no-to-jaguar/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's all these freaking blogs that cause this mass speculation. And yet, as PJ pointed out, here we all are reading it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Upirons]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 9th 2006 1:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UPDATE: Russian automaker GAZ says no to Jaguar]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/update-russian-automaker-gaz-says-no-to-jaguar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/update-russian-automaker-gaz-says-no-to-jaguar/</guid><description><![CDATA[...But blogs aren't news. Autoblog is just a random link of items on the automotive topic from other sources. The bloggers have little or no automotive industry experience at all. We don't expect any type of editorial standard, correct spelling or grammar.<br><br>I just feel that automotive magazines & newspapers have become so lazy that they just publish headlines without confirmation and print speculation as fact.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shawn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 9th 2006 2:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on UPDATE: Russian automaker GAZ says no to Jaguar]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/update-russian-automaker-gaz-says-no-to-jaguar/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/09/update-russian-automaker-gaz-says-no-to-jaguar/</guid><description><![CDATA[PJ, even a broken clock is right twice a day, so I do skim the articles for the occasional insight.  Besides, the silliness is sometimes amusing.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CH]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 9th 2006 2:59PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>