<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</guid><description><![CDATA[dont get me wrong, i just had to wipe the drool off my mouth, but i cant get over the gps screen being off near the driver door, seemingly blocked by the drivers legs?? this is truly and amazing car in lots of ways, besides the drivetrain. I think this car is worth it on looks alone which i consider to be better then that of its lotus cousin.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 20th 2006 4:14AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</guid><description><![CDATA[Since first time i heard about this project i was very thrilled by an idea of having an electric sports car. Now when it is shown at the premiere i was completly blown away. <br>Like the performance, i can bet that it will be popular among street racers with such an acceleration. <br>Can't wait to read independent review.<br><br>Exceptionally well done job Tesla Motors. <br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[i.Van]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 20th 2006 4:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</guid><description><![CDATA[Its funny this thing will cost $80,000 to $120,000.  It has been reported that it cost GM about $80,000 to build each copy of the EV1, causing them to lose at least $50,000 on each copy.  (since they were lease only cars, they probably lost more)<br><br>It will be interesting to see if all these freaks who are mad at GM for not continuing to build a money-losing car will pony up the $80,000 bucks to buy one of these.  It's my feeling that they only want an electric car if its subsidized by someone else.  Most everyone believes that Toyota loses money on every Prius too.  It would be interesting to see what would happen if car companies charged the true cost of the cars (like Tesla is doing)instead of the enviros getting their rides subsidized by the manufacturers and by tax deductions. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The other Bob]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 20th 2006 4:42AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</guid><description><![CDATA[well perhaps we could easily afford that subsidy if we redirected the 150 billlion dollars that it is estimated are spent in all ways that subsidise oil.  THis figure was listed in that article on forms of new energy in the most recent economist (writing this 7/18/08).  appearently the figure is not usually even calculated but was requested recently by the department of energy head.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas Forbes]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 18th 2008 1:27PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</guid><description><![CDATA[well, this is an sports car with 0-60 in 4 secs.<br><br>It is also based of Lotus Elise, so it seems, even though nobody is mentioning it... And lotus is even building it...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sp]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 20th 2006 4:54AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</guid><description><![CDATA[one other major problem....batteries.... they dont last very long and 6800 of them are not cheap to replace. i dont see a spec anywhere on how long they last for. wont  alot of angry drivers will have dead cars in a year or two?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 20th 2006 5:06AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</guid><description><![CDATA[even if tesla is a rather lame name the roadster should at least drive well if according to #3 it is based on a mk2 lotus elise (which is pretty obvious at first glance though not as good looking). you never know, it cold become the mx-5 of electric cars]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[julian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 20th 2006 5:43AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</guid><description><![CDATA[aaron - read the article. A range of 250 miles on a single battery charge is a major improvement for electric vehicles, which in the past have been limited to around 100 miles.<br><br>that being said, there are a lot of proprietary battery technologies being developed that could help improve future electric vehicles, most notably in terms of charge time. Toshiba, Altair Nanotech, and A123 are all developing fast charge lithium batteries. (Some or all of these are lithium polymer systems, as opposed to traditional liquid electrolyte. I'm not sure groups are doing what).<br><br>ALSO, having the decency and common sense to include a two-speed transmission so the car can get past 100mph is another kind act by the folks at Tesla. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AES]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 20th 2006 6:02AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have been waiting for this chic to come out like I have never waited for anything.<br><br>Ask me, for looks,I give it 10/10, all hands down. Love the sleeky sport's car look and yeh the red suits it better than the black.<br><br>For battery life however there are issues, 250 miles that's about 400 km on a single battery charge! Not too good for long distance travels, or is it ?<br><br>The fact that you mentioned of it being a green car is noteworthy. I wonder how it would feel to have a car without a tail pipe.<br><br>I just did a lookup for the car on Wiki and it seems the CEO's name over there is mentioned as 'Mark Eberhard' whereas the press release names him as 'Martin Eberhard' ...<br><br>Anyways ...0-60 in 4 secs is good ... The Looks rock ...<br>I want this babe :)<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Abby]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 20th 2006 6:03AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm quite astonished by the unveiling of the Tesla Roadster.  Simply put, this car has the ability to change the automotive industry if it becomes a success!  <br><br>If you read the Wired magazine article, you'll find that  the company was founded by persons specializing in engineering, internet, and technologies; rather than  automobile specialists!  Tesla's website notes that cars will be sold directly through the website (with available test drives in certain locations).  <br><br>From a business standpoint, I like Tesla's plan.  I only worry about the $100k pricetag, but taking into consideration the production of such high-end sports cars as the Porsche Carrera GT (I saw one of those in Newport Beach, CA a few months back), the Ferrari Enzo, and the Bugatti Veyron - there might be enough rich persons out there willing to take a risk on a "futuristic sports car."  <br><br>On a personal note, a friend of mine recently purchased a new sports car this week, featuring over 300hp.  When he told me he had purchased it, I was really quite in awe, as I drive an economical car and rarely talk or even hear about fast cars.  Now taking into consideration the potential for success in the future of the Tesla Roadster and its unbelievable accelration and high top-speed, it makes me wonder how far technology will push automobiles in the years to come.  <br><br>Just look at the Governor's face while he sits idly as a passenger.  Even a movie actor, a Hummer owner, and a Governor would appreciate a low-emission, technologically advanced, sports car.   <br><br>--<br>A supporter of Tesla]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 20th 2006 6:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</guid><description><![CDATA[Can't find a weight on Tesla's web site, as I'm curious how much more it weighs than an Elise.  Those lithium batteries can't be cheap, and that 3.5hr full charge time probably requires a 220V unit. Lotus had a prototype aluminum space-frame MPV a few months ago, adaptable to FWD, RWD, AWD.  Will this be Tesla's next vehicle?<br><br>I was thinking that Tesla & Wrightspeed are adapting lightweight MR (or RR) chassis production vehicles with their EV powertrains.  There are several more vehicles out there, such as the Toyota MR2, Smart fortwo, Mitusbishi i, that you could start with a cheap platform and then put 5 figures worth of batteries & powertrain into, resulting vehicle being cheaper than the Tesla although not by all that much.  Mitsubishi i would give you a practical 4 passenger vehicle, although the cost would probably be over $50k once converted.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Shame]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 20th 2006 6:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</guid><description><![CDATA[wow, they did a great job of making a perfectly good looking car hideous.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ryan beekman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 20th 2006 7:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</guid><description><![CDATA[Come on, Autoblog... "unveiled their uber-chic Roadster, a supercharged electric vehicle"... tip: the word "supercharged" has a specific meaning in the automotive world. You can't even get hyperbole right. Or was this supposed to be a pun?<br><br>More relevantly: has anyone seen anything about recharge times and battery life on this thing?<br><br>$80K may be a fair price, but it's a LOT for a sportscar with such an embarassingly low top-end. Hell, before the population increased around here, I used to drive to work at 130 MPH each morning.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RacetrackOwner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 20th 2006 7:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</guid><description><![CDATA[sp -- The Lotus connection was not only "mentioned," it is fully explained in another Autoblog entry posted at 11PM last night, here:<br><br><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/19/tesla-roadster-pics-are-out-there/" rel="nofollow">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/19/tesla-roadster-pics-are-out-there/</a><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[RacetrackOwner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 20th 2006 7:22AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</guid><description><![CDATA[Charge time is mentioned as being around 3.5 hours at 240V. That was in the New York times. At 110 volts it would take a lot longer, obviously. <br><br>I'm excited about this product but I really hope future versions incorporate faster charging batteries. Any thought on lithium polymer cell development, Martin, in case you're reading? :P<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AES]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 20th 2006 7:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's a great looking car.<br><br>The numbers show it to be a great performing car.<br><br>Couple that with the fact that it's all electric, and it's a great overall concept. The only thing that will be missing will be a great 'performance sound.'<br><br>I hope these sell like hotcakes, I wish the best for the Tesla team.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ZipperSeven]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 20th 2006 7:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</guid><description><![CDATA[$60 million in funding to put an electric motor in a Lotus Elise?<br><br>The review calls the guy "a modern day Preston Tucker." How appropriate! And it will be just as successful.<br><br>You guys are smoking crack if you think this car makes sense or will succeed. After Ed Begley, Jr. buys his, who will buy the next one?<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Yeah, right!]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 20th 2006 8:17AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</guid><description><![CDATA[Imagine if they could get the range up to at least 500 miles and get a major hotel/motel chain to put in recharging stations---would be nice. They could put an intelligent interface on the charger plug which communicates the VIN. You park and plug at the hotel, register in the hotel with your VIN, the charging station activates when it sees a registered VIN, they just add the KWH to you hotel bill. I've been an EV detractor, but I think I'd buy one if something like this comes along.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[CarLover]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 20th 2006 8:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</guid><description><![CDATA[CarLover that is a pretty good idea! Someone ought to contact W hotels...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[automatica]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 20th 2006 8:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/20/tesla-roadster-unveiling-in-santa-monica/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think Aaron's question on "battery life" isn't how long the batteries will hold a charge, and how far the car can go on a single charge - it's how long the batteries THEMSELVES will last, before needing to be physically replaced. Hence the comment "6800 of them are not cheap to replace". And are there 6800 individual batteries? Or are they built in groups? (I'd imagine it's groups... 6800 individual connections would be crazy!)<br><br>It's a very important question - it's probably one of the weaker points of the car, maintenance-cost-wise.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 20th 2006 8:40AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>