<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/15/unintended-acceleration-allegations-leveled-against-jeep-grand/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/15/unintended-acceleration-allegations-leveled-against-jeep-grand/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/15/unintended-acceleration-allegations-leveled-against-jeep-grand/</guid><description><![CDATA[Excuse me, but changing from N to D usually is during a timeframe in which the driver is suppose to have their foot on the brake pedal. Maybe its just operator error?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[GhostDoggy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 15th 2006 8:58AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>