• Mar 17, 2006



Depress the clutch (right foot on the brake, please), reach down between the seats, and twist the key, putting Saab’s 2.3-liter on turbocharged notice. [Long] throw the gearshift into the lowest of the transmission's five available forward ratios, and point the 9-5's Darth Vader proboscis down the road like you mean it.

But hang on a sec. In true anorak fashion, before engaging in a bout of Swedish shenanigans, turn off the engine, get out and pop your gourd underneath the hood to see what sort of vehicular fury Saab's engineers have rendered. The 9-5's inline-four marshals a respectable 260 horsepower (ten more than last year), and indeed, offers damned-near class-leading torque incredibly low down in the powerband-- particularly impressive for such a small engine (try 258 lb.-ft. @ 1,900 rpm). 

But here's the thing: Saab has loosed those steeds from the corral via the wrong gate-- the one out front. Overly analytical-types are invited to carp about foul-weather practicality all they want, but in a proper sport sedan, the front roundies are best left to deal with turning and braking duties (or at least sharing power-distribution chores with the rears). Expecting the lead wheels to cope with Saab's turbocharged brand of gumption is a program for corrupted helm feel and understeer, and the 9-5 reads the recipe chapter and verse.

(Click here for a complete dynamic assessment and tons more wallpaper-grade high-res photos!)



Admittedly, when driven in isolation (particularly at 7/10ths or less), the Saab largely manages to escape most criticism. Despite being down two-to-four cylinders on its competition, forced induction goes a long way toward balancing the scales. This is particularly true out on the highway, where the 9-5 makes for a credible long distance cruiser, with 5th gear at 75 mph keeping the turbo on the lip of its tipping point for excellent passing reserves. But even if Saab has managed to extract class-competitive numbers out of its inline quadbanger, refinement remains an issue, as revs arrive and depart neither quickly or sweetly. Fortunately(?), said revolutions don't exactly have to fall from a great height -- the redline is pegged just a hair north of 6,000 rpm. Not exactly banshee wailers, the Swedish.

One might expect to reap big dividends at the pump given the Saab's thrifty-sounding mill. But given the 9-5's class 'heavyweight' status, the engine’s reserves are called upon more often than might otherwise be the case, and mileage suffers as a result. According to the trip-meter, we averaged about 17 mpg in spirited city driving, with a tankful or two of highway high-test quaffed to the tune of 25 mpg. In other words, resolutely average stuff.



Given what was surely a sow's ear budget, Saab has somehow scrimped together nearly 1,500 changes for the 2006 model year. We've a distinct feeling that a goodly portion of those adjustments are the parts-count stemming from the 9-5's exterior restyling, but regardless, Saab has been kind enough to re-jigger the suspension, widen the rear track and make other adjustments of dynamic consequence.

The payoff is that the Saab's tired bones don't let slip their AARP card-carrying status at the offset of enthusiastic driving (older 9-5s do exactly this). But try and play 'tag' on a wavy stretch of asphalt with a contemporary mount of Germanic or Japanese persuasion, and prepare to feel cheated. In order to ensure all of 9-5's ponies don't run off into the hedges (or worse, generate tons of axle-tramp), Saab's engineers have imbued the 9-5 with an overly compliant front suspension. This is a fine solution for making sure the power gets to the ground and for doing the interstate hustle, but the result is significantly more body roll than expected from a $35k European 'Sport' package sedan. 

Cornering isn't the Saab's strong-suit, either. We've already discussed how the 9-5's restyling gives viewers the impression of tremendous overhangs, and this isn't an illusion. By way of illustration, the 9-5 is better than 1' longer than a BMW 325i, yet its wheelbase is more than 2" shorter. The same 'tale of the tape' plays out with everything in class from the Acura TL to Volvo's S60 and the Lexus IS.  The big overhangs do lovely things for Saab's trunk space (and likely something for pedestrian safety), but for the car's performance envelope, the ramifications aren't as welcome. This is particularly true in light of the 9-5's naughty-by-nature front-wheel-drive setup. When hurtling along one's favorite twisty road, the effect is roughly akin to loading a 30-pound bag of dog kibble into the leading edge of a (decade-old) shopping cart, then attempting to swiftly navigate Wal Mart's swollen aisles the day after Thanksgiving. Possible? Perhaps. Rewarding? Not so much. Don't blame the 17" Pirelli P6’s... they're just being asked to freight too much Purina.

For those anoraks who think we're a bunch of sour lingonberries grapes, it bears repeating: Most of 9-5's shortcomings don't let on without comparison shopping or back-to-back driving. But the fact remains, even among the segment's other front-drivers, the Trollhattenite feels dynamically dated.

 

In day-to-day slogging, the Saab is perfectly adequate, with a surprisingly forgiving ride (save a peculiar aversion to sharp single impacts like that of unexpected potholes), enough torque to zip away from stoplights with genuine authority, and gobs of space for passenger and canine chow alike. In other words, the 9-5 is unlikely to offend brand loyalists. And given the doubtlessly modest sums GM invested on the Big Swede’s elderly platform, the 9-5 makes a surprisingly good show of itself. But for an as-tested $37,760 outlay, both assiduous anoraks and the proud griffin on Saab's crest deserve better.

 

 

Just catching up? Check out:

2006 Saab 9-5 2.3T Sport: In the Autoblog Garage Day 1-2 and 2006 Saab 9-5 2.3T Sport: In the Autoblog Garage Day 3-4

 



I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 20 Comments
      • 8 Years Ago
      i have an acura tl, which is FWD and has 258 hp (270 before SAE changes) and i don't see the big problem with that kind of setup. auto critics always complain about it, but i dont see really the point. i guess i just don't drive like a racecar driver on my daily commute. (actually now that i think about it...sometimes i do :) but it handles awesome all the same)
      • 8 Years Ago
      I like the shopping-cart analogy. Very original. I disagree with the trash-talkers here.
      • 8 Years Ago
      That car looks like an Izuzu,expected better from saab
      • 8 Years Ago
      The more I look at this thing, the more I despise it. I belive the Chief Engineer should have jumped off that bridge in the photo and joined his 9-5 at the bottom of the river.

      Speaking of locomotives, Geely is comming down the tracks, along with a slew of other competitors. This 10+ year old car deserves to be put out of its misery and cremated.
      • 8 Years Ago
      #15...i'm glad i posted just in time. i love your comment about how the TL "drives like a garbage scow" - i'd love to know how many times you've actually driven one. and please don't give me BS about how your sister's brother's cousin lets you drive it every weekend...
      • 8 Years Ago
      Saab has managed to make great handling cars with the front wheels driving.

      http://automobilesdeluxe.blogspot.com/2006/03/new-face-for-old-car.html
      • 8 Years Ago
      Personally i find the 9-3 to be the better car for the future of Saab....Perhaps GM should step aside and let the Swedes do what they do best... Design better Saabs!!
      Can you imagine a all wheel drive...300hp..Turbo 9-3 Aero!!..How about all wheel drive across the board for Saab period.....!!!
      • 8 Years Ago
      Nice detailed review, and looks to be a more competitive vehicle than I would've guessed (styling misgivings aside). Still, she's no 'Best in Show,' but as a fellow 'anorak' I appreciate the effort.

      Bring us a clean-sheet Saab already, and make sure to give Mr. Paukert the keys!
      • 8 Years Ago
      I too drove the Acura TL and did not like the handling. It nose dives in turns and overly leaned around corners. Maybe on level up from a garabe scow but many below a Saab.
      • 8 Years Ago
      Yuck, I hate those front lights! And it almost looks exactly like a Honda Civic from the back.
      • 8 Years Ago
      Kudos to the writer on a brilliantly crafted piece.
      Having said that, I'd like to say that here in Brazil SAAB was never a choice among car fans when it was introduced to our market in the early 90s. Very few were
      sold here and they have all but disappeared. This 9-5 shows very little promise to the future of the make. Seems like it is destined to go the way of the dodo soon.
      • 8 Years Ago
      what language is that written in?
    • Load More Comments