Depress the clutch (right foot on the brake, please), reach down between the seats, and twist the key, putting
Saab’s 2.3-liter on turbocharged notice. [Long] throw the gearshift into the lowest of the transmission's five
available forward ratios, and point the 9-5's Darth Vader proboscis down the road like you mean it.
But hang on a sec. In true anorak fashion, before engaging in a bout of Swedish shenanigans, turn off the engine, get out and pop your gourd underneath the hood to see what sort of vehicular fury Saab's engineers have rendered. The 9-5's inline-four marshals a respectable 260 horsepower (ten more than last year), and indeed, offers damned-near class-leading torque incredibly low down in the powerband-- particularly impressive for such a small engine (try 258 lb.-ft. @ 1,900 rpm).
But here's the thing: Saab has loosed those steeds from the corral via the wrong gate-- the one out front. Overly analytical-types are invited to carp about foul-weather practicality all they want, but in a proper sport sedan, the front roundies are best left to deal with turning and braking duties (or at least sharing power-distribution chores with the rears). Expecting the lead wheels to cope with Saab's turbocharged brand of gumption is a program for corrupted helm feel and understeer, and the 9-5 reads the recipe chapter and verse.
(Click here for a complete dynamic assessment and tons more wallpaper-grade high-res photos!)
Admittedly, when driven in isolation (particularly at 7/10ths or less), the Saab largely manages to escape most
criticism. Despite being down two-to-four cylinders on its competition, forced induction goes a long way toward
balancing the scales. This is particularly true out on the highway, where the 9-5 makes for a credible long distance
cruiser, with 5th gear at 75 mph keeping the turbo on the lip of its tipping point for excellent passing reserves.
But even if Saab has managed to extract class-competitive numbers out of its inline quadbanger, refinement remains an
issue, as revs arrive and depart neither quickly or sweetly. Fortunately(?), said revolutions don't exactly have to
fall from a great height -- the redline is pegged just a hair north of 6,000 rpm. Not exactly banshee wailers, the
Swedish.
One might expect to reap big dividends at the pump given the Saab's thrifty-sounding mill. But
given the 9-5's class 'heavyweight' status, the engine’s reserves are called upon more often than might otherwise
be the case, and mileage suffers as a result. According to the trip-meter, we averaged about 17 mpg in spirited city
driving, with a tankful or two of highway high-test quaffed to the tune of 25 mpg. In other words, resolutely average
stuff.
Given what was surely a sow's ear budget, Saab has somehow scrimped together nearly 1,500
changes for the 2006 model year. We've a distinct feeling that a goodly portion of those adjustments are the
parts-count stemming from the 9-5's exterior restyling, but regardless, Saab has been kind enough to re-jigger the
suspension, widen the rear track and make other adjustments of dynamic consequence.
The payoff is that the
Saab's tired bones don't let slip their AARP card-carrying status at the offset of enthusiastic driving (older 9-5s do
exactly this). But try and play 'tag' on a wavy stretch of asphalt with a contemporary mount of Germanic or Japanese
persuasion, and prepare to feel cheated. In order to ensure all of 9-5's ponies don't run off into the hedges (or
worse, generate tons of axle-tramp), Saab's engineers have imbued the 9-5 with an overly compliant front suspension.
This is a fine solution for making sure the power gets to the ground and for doing the interstate hustle, but the
result is significantly more body roll than expected from a $35k European 'Sport' package sedan.
Cornering isn't the Saab's strong-suit, either. We've already discussed how the 9-5's restyling gives viewers the impression of tremendous overhangs, and this isn't an illusion. By way of illustration, the 9-5 is better than 1' longer than a BMW 325i, yet its wheelbase is more than 2" shorter. The same 'tale of the tape' plays out with everything in class from the Acura TL to Volvo's S60 and the Lexus IS. The big overhangs do lovely things for Saab's trunk space (and likely something for pedestrian safety), but for the car's performance envelope, the ramifications aren't as welcome. This is particularly true in light of the 9-5's naughty-by-nature front-wheel-drive setup. When hurtling along one's favorite twisty road, the effect is roughly akin to loading a 30-pound bag of dog kibble into the leading edge of a (decade-old) shopping cart, then attempting to swiftly navigate Wal Mart's swollen aisles the day after Thanksgiving. Possible? Perhaps. Rewarding? Not so much. Don't blame the 17" Pirelli P6’s... they're just being asked to freight too much Purina.
For those anoraks who think we're a bunch of sour lingonberries grapes, it bears repeating: Most of 9-5's shortcomings don't let on without comparison shopping or back-to-back driving. But the fact remains, even among the segment's other front-drivers, the Trollhattenite feels dynamically dated.
In day-to-day slogging, the Saab is perfectly adequate, with a surprisingly forgiving ride (save a peculiar aversion to sharp single impacts like that of unexpected potholes), enough torque to zip away from stoplights with genuine authority, and gobs of space for passenger and canine chow alike. In other words, the 9-5 is unlikely to offend brand loyalists. And given the doubtlessly modest sums GM invested on the Big Swede’s elderly platform, the 9-5 makes a surprisingly good show of itself. But for an as-tested $37,760 outlay, both assiduous anoraks and the proud griffin on Saab's crest deserve better.
Just catching up? Check out:
2006 Saab 9-5 2.3T Sport: In the Autoblog Garage Day 1-2 and 2006 Saab 9-5 2.3T Sport: In the Autoblog Garage Day 3-4













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
damian @ Mar 17th 2006 12:04PM
That is one sorry looking car, what on earth happened to poor old Saab?
Richard Warren @ Mar 17th 2006 12:04PM
How about a road test of the locomotive?
mickster @ Mar 17th 2006 12:05PM
Saab-Born from Trains?
Gunnar Heinrich @ Mar 17th 2006 12:11PM
Saab has managed to make great handling cars with the front wheels driving.
http://automobilesdeluxe.blogspot.com/2006/03/new-face-for-old-car.html
BG_SAABer @ Mar 17th 2006 12:29PM
If this is the modern American English that you proclaim as attractive and entertaining to read, than I should be a real astronaut.
I am totally confused of your writing and can not get the message about your driving test. Can't you write clearly defined sentences? What is that word jiggle? From you virtual garage you are addressing an audience of million peoples. This is not a poetry sonnet or circus performance. Be more respectful to your work.
James @ Mar 17th 2006 12:30PM
Saab took lessons from Pontiac's 1990's strategy: Add a much bigger nose and people won't notice the rest didn't change.
Brad @ Mar 17th 2006 12:31PM
what language is that written in?
James @ Mar 17th 2006 12:37PM
I must say that I agree with Brad. This review was hard to read. I suspect that Chris was having so much fun being clever, he forgot to re-read for content and flow.
Rastus @ Mar 17th 2006 12:44PM
The more I look at this thing, the more I despise it. I belive the Chief Engineer should have jumped off that bridge in the photo and joined his 9-5 at the bottom of the river.
Speaking of locomotives, Geely is comming down the tracks, along with a slew of other competitors. This 10+ year old car deserves to be put out of its misery and cremated.
showgoer33 @ Mar 17th 2006 1:43PM
I am quite hopeful of a return the "the real Saab". This 9-5 is but a band-aid until the Epsilon 2 version hits in a few years. However (and Gunnar disagrees), I don't believe that a bunch of Germans in Russelsheim can capture the essence of Swedish engineering.
Mickster: Good one! Born of Trains. hahaha
Jin Kim @ Mar 17th 2006 1:46PM
I might be in the minority, but I thought the writing style was pretty funny. Let me qualify that: since I have no interest in Saabs but like reading auto reviews, I had no vested interest on the Saab: the more funny language he used to describe the Saab's performance, the more I enjoyed it! But that kind of language wouldn't fly if he was reviewing a VW (my favorite!)... ;)
WS @ Mar 17th 2006 1:46PM
I like the shopping-cart analogy. Very original. I disagree with the trash-talkers here.
Mike @ Mar 17th 2006 2:07PM
Some "spirited" writing is nice and keeps people interested, but honestly, what does this sentence mean: "The payoff is that the Saab's tired bones don't let slip their AARP card-carrying status at the offset of enthusiastic driving (older 9-5s do exactly this)."
Between misused words (I think you meant "onset") and an overstretched metaphor (does letting slip your AARP status mean you are acting old or acting young?), it's completely incomprehensible, except in context (based on the next sentence, I guess you were saying it drives pretty well).
A critical reread or, better yet, getting one of your fellow autobloggers to give it the once-over with a red pen (since you guys have no editor) might be just the thing. I don't think you should stop trying to be colorful and keep things interesting, Chris, but please do toss a bone to those of us who are also interested in what you're actually trying to convey ;)
David Munoz @ Mar 17th 2006 2:39PM
Wow... what's with all the negativity?
To recap for those who want Mr. Paukert's review dumbed/down spoon-fed to them:
* Not bad -- if you don't drive the competition
* Good power despite small engine
* Real sport sedans aren't front wheel drive
* Doesn't handle well enough
* Odd styling
* Won't expand Saab appeal among non-owners
* Old, not a great value
For everyone else who enjoys reading something different and being challenged occasionally, keep writing, Chris!
Oh, and #13, "offset" is fine (meaning: "The start or initial stage; the outset." - Dictionary.com). If you're going to crack on the guy, at least make sure you've got your shit together, eh?
I'll give you that the AARP card thing is a bit wordy, but I think he means that it doesn't show its age until you push it.
Now... everyone go have a green beer and lighten up!
Fred @ Mar 17th 2006 2:42PM
While I sympathize about some of the metaphorical excess, folks should recall this is free content. It's not as low as complaining about another Autoblog reviewer's photography in rather insulting terms, as happened recently, but still.
As far as the car goes, I personally have enjoyed driving the 9-3 and 9-2X, but hated the only drive I had on an old 9-5 Aero. On the other hand, its front-drive dynamics can't possibly be worse than the Acura TL, which looks great but drives like a garbage scow.
I suspect the problem, as has been the case with Saab for a while in the American market, is price. The 9-3 is actually a fun car and a handsome one, but not for C350/330i money. A 9-5 wagon is a useful device, but only for quite a bit less than Saab wants for it. I recall when GM was discounting Saabs steeply last year, I couldn't find a 9-2x for love or money, which I think goes to show that people like the cars, just not the price.
Mike @ Mar 17th 2006 2:51PM
i have an acura tl, which is FWD and has 258 hp (270 before SAE changes) and i don't see the big problem with that kind of setup. auto critics always complain about it, but i dont see really the point. i guess i just don't drive like a racecar driver on my daily commute. (actually now that i think about it...sometimes i do :) but it handles awesome all the same)
Mike @ Mar 17th 2006 2:57PM
#15...i'm glad i posted just in time. i love your comment about how the TL "drives like a garbage scow" - i'd love to know how many times you've actually driven one. and please don't give me BS about how your sister's brother's cousin lets you drive it every weekend...
Mike @ Mar 17th 2006 3:50PM
I don't want to argue over specifics (though I'm not changing my mind about onset/offset;) -- I was trying to offer something a bit more constructive to Chris than just heaping scorn.
As to this being free content, that's true. But at the same time, weblogs makes money off these blogs, and the bloggers themselves are paid. I don't think it's unfair to ask a little more of them than of your average pajama-clad bedroom wannabe (like me). I don't think it'd be too much to ask of their time that they, for example, proofread each others' posts.
areyes @ Mar 17th 2006 4:47PM
That car looks like an Izuzu,expected better from saab
areyes @ Mar 17th 2006 4:47PM
That car looks like an Izuzu,expected better from saab