
It’s our hope that any page referring to GM’s interior design during the last twenty-five years be ripped out of the annals of automotive history. It’s time for the General to begin a new chapter on interiors. Gone are the gaps, cheap plastic and oversized cartoon buttons that have been the company's unfortunate trademark for so long. The Lucerne’s dash has been designed with the same restraint and minimalism as its exterior, with a focus more on quality of materials, ergonomics and fit and finish. And it seems GM has emptied out its old parts bin and refilled it with new pieces, as some of the Lucerne’s switchgear can also be found in the new 2007 Chevy Tahoe.
The Lucerne’s interior design is as large a leap forward for Buick as the exterior design, but we’re not ready yet to anoint GM the 'King of Cockpits.' Read on to see where the Lucerne’s cabin rewrites the book on GM interiors and where it refers back to previous passages.

At first the Lucerne’s dash was a welcome sight after the blitzkrieg of buttons we encountered in Land Rover’s Range Rover Sport. Again we see the austerity of the vehicle’s exterior design transferred to the dash, as flush surfaces appear shrink-wrapped around simple shapes.

The driver’s first job upon entering the Lucerne is to settle into the leather-appointed driver’s seat and order up one of three heat settings for the back, bum or both. The seats in our CXS also cool by blasting cold air through their custom perforated leather. Heated and cooled seats are a hefty $500 option, but our butts are fast becoming addicted to the guilty pleasure, and memory settings for two drivers assures that the Lucerne will never forget how you like your rear catered to.

The Luxury Package on our tester also includes 8-way power adjustments and 4-way power adjustable lumbar support for the front seats. Despite the extra control, it was difficult to find a comfortable seating position in the Lucerne. The somewhat firm seat cushions, combined with a lack of bolstering made us feel like we were sitting on the seats, not in them.

Look up, and driver's eyes are greeted by a simple dash design that’s straightforward and to the point. The audio and HVAC controls cohabit a squarish black expanse that stands out in a sea of beige plastic and wood appliqué. The controls are very European in design, featuring predominantly flush buttons that offer fingertips soft feedback when pushed. Three large dials to control the stereo’s volume, fan speed and vent control rotate easily and also feature dampened clicks to track their progress. These large dials are wrapped with soft, high friction rubber that feels expensive and makes a good first impression on the vehicle’s operator.


One will also find faux wood growing in the gauge cluster where the tach, speedo and coolant/fuel dials reside. At a quick glance, the gauges look like an old clock on your grandmother’s mantle, but this is still a Buick, after all. The large white-on-black speedo is visible through the frame of a new steering wheel that is pure vanilla in flavor and features new cruise control and remote audio switchgear also shared with the 2007 Chevy Tahoe. The door locks and power window pieces also come from the new GM parts bin and not only feel better than the old switchgear, but operate better, as well.

While we were initially impressed with the straightforward dash design of the Lucerne, that impression quickly retreated and was replaced with a sense of ennui. Buick’s aren’t supposed to get all up in your grille with their appointments, but we found ourselves bored while sitting in the driver’s seat of ths $37K automobile. Thankfully, our CXS came with XM satellite radio and someone remembered to pay the subscription fee this month. There’s also a discrete auxiliary input for the 9-speaker harmon/kardon sound system that enables use of an iPod or other such MP3 player. Even with the audio system available to occupy one's time, the interior of the Lucerne doesn’t impact the senses and excite, instead laying low and out of the way.

One item that is conspicuously absent from our tester and its option sheet is a navigation system. We think such a gadget should be made available in a vehicle that can be optioned up into the upper $30K range. The Tahoe can be had with one, though we fear the Lucerne will have to wait for a major dash redesign before one could be integrated.

Shoppers in this segment tend to care more than the average Joe about how much stuff can be stuffed in the trunk, and the Lucerne’s booty can swallow an above average 17 cu. ft. of cargo. That’s enough to out pack everything but the Ford Five-Hundred, which has a freakish capacity of 21.2 cu. ft. Unfortunately, the old school hinges compromise the Lucerne’s trunk space every time the lid is closed. Again, this kind of thing may fly on a $25K sedan, but it’s not something we expect to encounter on one that costs $37K.
The fit and finish of the Lucerne’s interior is well above what GM has offered in the recent past, though we’ll stop short of calling it a class leader until these new interiors have gone around the block a few times. The Lucerne’s interior feels like it’ll stand the test of time, though our tester was already showing some wear and tear after only 3,000-plus miles.

The best feature of the Lucerne’s interior is that it’s as far removed from the ones it replaces as possible. The design, the materials and the fit and finish have all come far enough along to compete in the segment, though a few niggles remain. The uncomfortable seats, lack of a nav system and durability question are all cause for a pause when considering the Lucerne, though we don’t think any will stand out as a deal-breaker on the lot.
[In our final review of the 2006 Buick Lucerne CSX we’ll take this big sedan in search of some highway miles and a bend or two.]
For Day 1-2 of our review of the 2006 Buick Lucerne CSX click here.



















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Paul @ Mar 9th 2006 11:45AM
still looks plain and cheap to me. they are still a few years behind the quality coming from Japan. its the things you dont see that would scare me. the typical lowball american mechanicals that need a chase car following waiting for the next breakdown.
jwong @ Mar 9th 2006 11:46AM
I wonder if Acura's going to have a fit about the "CSX" bit.
Christopher @ Mar 9th 2006 11:52AM
Couldn't I get an A4, 3 series, Volvo, or Acura for that kind of money?
Corey @ Mar 9th 2006 11:55AM
It's a step in the right direction, but still lacking originality, and as John Neff pointed out, "doesn’t impact the senses and excite."
Josh Hanley @ Mar 9th 2006 11:57AM
The navigation system is now available on the Lucerne. www.buick.com
Also, the interior looks way better in black.
Tiger @ Mar 9th 2006 12:01PM
GM does have some nice features in their car that you'd think every manufacturer would copy. 2 that stand out to me are the DRL cancel switch and retained accessory power for the radio. Lexus doesn't offer these 2 features, though they should.
laserwizard @ Mar 9th 2006 12:01PM
I cannot share the assessment that GM has improved interior design in its latest products. I am but a 6 foot tall gentleman and found GM's latest interiors to be as uncomfortable to sit in as what I would imagine an electric chair to be like. Someone at GM has decided to push the bottoms of the dashboards right into where my knees want to be. Furthermore, the trend in GM design is to put the console and radio controls into a pod that puts it right where my right knee would otherwise occupy. So consistent are these two maladies that there is no way in hell I'd ever ride in a GM car much less buy one.
I found the Lucerne to be as cheaply built as any GM car - sharing none of the quality appearance of Acura's or Lexi - and I loathe Japanese cars! While GM may have improved their appearance, these are still cheaply built vehicles with little to offer anyone other than a junkyard car crusher.
These new GM cars are to avoided at all costs. They aren't any good, they are uncomfortable, and you'll have a car that will be recalled more often than you have payment coupons in your book.
Josh Hanley @ Mar 9th 2006 12:03PM
You get some of the cars for the price, but in terms of size you need to compare the Lucerne to the BMW 7 series, and Audi a-8. They are both about twice the cost of the Lucerne.
Joel A @ Mar 9th 2006 12:05PM
"It's a step in the right direction, but still lacking originality, and as John Neff pointed out, "doesn’t impact the senses and excite."
Perhaps, Corey, but I don't think that was GM's aim. While Buick is aimed at a younger market than it has traditionally in the past, it's the segment that buys Avalons.
jjd @ Mar 9th 2006 12:12PM
It should be mentioned that lots about this car seems to be shared with the Cadillac DTS, including much of the interior, switchgear, electronics.
I rented a DTS in Florida recently and was pleasantly surprised with the features, the quality of the interior, the (improved over past Cadillacs) handling and the styling.
John @ Mar 9th 2006 12:13PM
# 8: I don't know where you are coming from. I'm 6'5", and GM cars are among the few that offer a comfortable seating position for me. That includes the Lucerne (which I have driven). For me, one of the worst offenders for seating comfort is Ford which offers the most uncomfortable seats in the 500.
max @ Mar 9th 2006 12:15PM
"They aren't any good, they are uncomfortable, and you'll have a car that will be recalled more often than you have payment coupons in your book."
I'm 6" 4', about 270-I found them comfortable and was happy that Buick leads JD Power and Consumer Reports in quality. I especially like the interior room-but it does look better in black.
It's still a girl's car however.
papercutninja @ Mar 9th 2006 12:18PM
Glad to see that Autoblog is going the way of Motor Trend, Car and Driver, Autoweek and all those other advertorial magazines. Just tow the company line, Autoblog. Very proud of you guys. I wonder how much of this review is also mentioned in the Lucerne press release...
Sanjay @ Mar 9th 2006 12:23PM
That is such a dire and bland interior its hilarious to think this was released in 2006. This is why GM deserves to fail, they're effort is abysmal. Just look at the steering wheel controls or the elec. seat adjustment, the detailing is terrible. When will they realise its not just the obviously seen switchgear that needs to be attractive and funtional? Thank god its not a blight that affects Europe, it would have been considered uncompetitive here 5 years ago!
Gooseneck hinges... @ Mar 9th 2006 12:24PM
I don't like gooseneck hinges either. But I think before you rip a $37K a new one for having them, you need to pop the trunk on a M-B E500. Guess what you'll see there?
http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/roadtests/roadtest/03.mercedesbenz.e500/03.mercedesbenz.e500.crg.500.jpg
As far as I can tell, the M-B has them because they work with the power trunk open/close mechanism whereas articulated hinges would not. Still, whether you get power trunk closing or not, you get stupid gooseneck hinges.
And at least 50% more than a Lucerne.
PAUL'S MOM @ Mar 9th 2006 12:26PM
I REALLY LIKE THIS CAR,I LIKE THE INTERIOR. I WISH MY SON WOULD MOVE TO JAPAN, HE'S BEEN SUCH A HUGE DISAPOINTMENT TO THE FAMILY
Fred @ Mar 9th 2006 12:27PM
Not sure why there is a need for an expensive integrated nav system when portable GPS units as good as, say, the Tom Tom series, are out there. They're cheaper, have all the functions of your average built-in unit (often more, e.g. bluetooth phone integration), and you can move them between personal vehicles or rental cars.
Hence, I don't really buy this as a reason not to get a CSX.
pedro @ Mar 9th 2006 12:36PM
The goosneck hinges on the MB500 however, retract into pre-defined wells. While there is still the drawback of lost trunk space, You can't fill the space up and then have the hinges mash down on the trunk contents. Thats the real issue with the hinges.
Dave in MI @ Mar 9th 2006 12:41PM
"Hey, lazerwizard, jump in, we are headed to the Lakers game..."
"there is no way in hell I'd ever ride in a GM car much less buy one"
"Sorry to hear that, enjoy the game on your Tivo..."
"come back in a non-GM car and I'll consider riding with you my friend. Oh, and stay away from Japanese cars, I loathe them"
Paul @ Mar 9th 2006 12:43PM
#8 and #12
Cant agree more. Especially your comments that the american companies deserve to fail. these products are yet one more fraud on the car buying public. cheap plastic designed by morons and assembled by morons.
i think the answer might be to shut down the buick lines in the us and import the chinese buicks. at least they will be cheap.