Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
BREAKING: GM and Chrysler talking about merger
Spy Shots: Nissan 370Z again, with interior shots
2010 Mazda3 unveiled ahead of LA Auto Show
Spy Shots: Nissan 370Z caught undisguised
GM on Corvette ZR1 cancellation rumor: "Not true."
Knight Rider: The Liveblog -- Season 1, Episode 3
In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Mazda RX-8 R3, return of the "hummer"
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Chevy Corvette Z06
Autoline on Autoblog with John McElroy
Paris 2008: Le Day 1 Wrapup
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this threadRumor du jour: Chrysler Imperial in the mix for 2010
(Page 1 of 1)
JZeke @ Mar 2nd 2006 8:08AM
I really hope they rethink the "ghetto rolls" styling on this car regardless of the chassis. Whats wrong with trying some different architecture thats at once American AND elegant?
I work on yachts and sport yachts for a living, and it feels like recent American super-luxury products are at best a riff on Italian or British designs. I know people who choose American luxury products tend to be more conservative than those who buy a Riva, Wally or a Pagani. That still doesnt excuse designers of American luxury products of copycat-ism.
Cadillac almost lead a mini-revolution with its flamboyant (in proportions) yet restrained (in detailing) V16 concept of 2003. I dont see why Chrysler cant move that game forward in a radical yet tasteful way. This current Imperial is neither.