It's a documentary, a
science class, a romance novella and an action film, all in one. The "masterwerk" otherwise known as
Porsche's 911 gets a brand-new website of its very own, featuring full specifications, the car's history, and
in-depth yet accessible descriptions of the advanced technology found lurking underneath its teardrop sheetmetal.
Oh, and don't get us started on the gallery... just make sure to have a roll of Bounty 'round to sop up the
drool.
(Thanks to Tank for the heads-up that the site is live)
New KITT Attack Mode revealed at Comic Con
London 2008: Honda OSM concept roadster says, "Cheerio!"
London 2008: Lotus unveils the Evora
2010 Chevy Camaro - Official Details and Images
2010 Chevy Camaro - LIVE from the reveal
In the Autoblog Garage: Aprilia RSV 1000 R
First Drive: Maserati Quattroporte S in Europe
First Drive: 2008 MINI Cooper S JCW
In the Autoblog Garage:2009 Nissan GT-R
North American Exclusive First Drive: Alfa MiTo
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Phil L. @ Feb 15th 2006 1:57PM
Very nice web site; very nice car.
I've always been a fan of the 911 - but a Turbo is simply out of my reach. For that matter, any recent model simply isn't affordable on my dad-with-kids budget.
But I've been keeping my eyes on early 80s non-turbo 911s, which can be surprisingly affordable and (fairly) reasonable to maintain. The mechanically fuel injected 3.0 911 SC models aren't a refined as later years, but are a lot of fun ('78 through '83). The 3.2 Motronic electronically injected model that showed up for '84 jumps up in price, but can approach a reasonable level for a 911 fan on a budget.
Item of trivia: I've noticed that on things like architectural drawings, etc., when they're looking for a car to put in the background, the most common shape I've seen is distinctly a 911...
Noah @ Feb 15th 2006 2:15PM
Too bad the engine is in the wrong place.
Cayman S - yes, 911 - no.
Joe @ Feb 15th 2006 2:22PM
"Too bad the engine is in the wrong place."
That, is a matter of opinion, and your opinion is wrong. ;)
Corey @ Feb 15th 2006 2:29PM
Drooooooool... excellent bang for the buck @ $150K. I'll take two, please.
jon from vancouver @ Feb 15th 2006 2:31PM
Wow that's all I can say. I own a 1976 911 Turbo and this new car, 30 years later, is amazing. How things have changed but the 911 spirit is still there.
Seabass @ Feb 15th 2006 6:24PM
To #1:
Parents bought a '79 911 SC for cheap. It had 89,000 miles on it, but for the past ten years the PO never drove it. My dad and I pulled the engine and checked everythig out ourselves. We found nothing wrong, so we put it back together and changed the fluids.
It's been five years/30,000 miles since and the only thing we've had to do to the 911 was fill up on gas and change the oil. The 3.0 911s are virtually bulletproof and will last forever.
Dreamer @ Feb 16th 2006 10:03AM
Anyone seen the front of the new Turbo? When you look at the headlights and the new marker lights it looks like a catfish.
Nick @ Feb 17th 2006 8:45PM
This car is 50k more then the Corvette Z06 and does not even compete performance wise. Looks the same as any other 911. Boooooooooring!
Porschista @ Feb 18th 2006 1:30PM
I don't care where is located the engine if it is a Porsche. I want all them.
averyjh @ Feb 23rd 2006 7:29PM
anybody else notice on the porsche website the list the tiptronic as faster than the manual to 60? is this a misprint?