Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
2010 Chevrolet Camaro priced: LS $22,995, SS $30,995
BREAKING: GM and Chrysler talking about merger
Spy Shots: Nissan 370Z again, with interior shots
2010 Mazda3 unveiled ahead of LA Auto Show
Spy Shots: Nissan 370Z caught undisguised
Knight Rider: The Liveblog -- Season 1, Episode 3
In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Mazda RX-8 R3, return of the "hummer"
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Chevy Corvette Z06
Autoline on Autoblog with John McElroy
Paris 2008: Le Day 1 Wrapup
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this thread(Page 1 of 1)
Mark @ Jan 17th 2006 11:09AM
Buzz, that's easy for you to say since you can apparently afford to buy not just one, but multiple exotics. For poor schmoes like me who can only dream of one day owning a Ferrari (or better yet an Aston Martin), you better believe that it would not be "just a car."
Yes, I was being facetious when I said I'd want to die if I crashed my Ferrari, but only slightly. For those of us who don't have enough money to view luxury items as essentially disposable, it would be pretty upsetting to lose something we'd put years upon years of effort and savings into, even though it's insured.