Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.











Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this threadDetroit Show Wrapup: Camaro concept received emergency reworking
(Page 1 of 1)
Edsel @ Jan 14th 2006 10:20AM
#2 & #3 I think you both accurately described the retro market. My recently acquired 1968 GTO convertible fulfills my "Boomer" lust for a muscle car I could not afford when they were new. After college, as my disposable income grew, the auto industry entered into a protracted performance coma for the next twenty years. We boomers were left with "performance" option pages filled with, gold packages, opera lamps, vinyl roofs, and pins stripes; nary a real honest, bone rattling, performance engine in sight. Even the poor Corvette was castrated beyond belief with a humorous 155HP engine.
Well, I've got "disposable" cash now and American muscle cars are back in a big way so I bought a 1968 GTO instead of a new retro because it was actually cheaper. However, I have since realized "ergonomics" & "safety" in 1968 were simply terms in a dictionary, they were not words used to describe Detroit's products in 1968. Don't get me wrong, I love my GTO but I keep fixating on the new retro stuff because it offers more performance, safety, and convenience than my 38 y/o antique.