Filed under: Concept Cars, Detroit Auto Show, Coupes
Dodge Challenger concept -- official photos and release
It's the worst-kept secret of the Detroit Auto Show, but official word is finally out nonetheless. We've covered the heck out of it, so here are just a few more details.
The design was penned by Chrysler Group's West Coast Pacifica Studio under the direction of Micheal Castiglione, and the crew came up with a list of attributes before they put chalk to paper: distinctly American; mega horsepower; pure, minimal, signature lines; aggressive air-grabbing grille; and bold colors and graphics. We think they hit the nail on the head, what with a 6.1L HEMI engine putting out 425 hp and 420 lb/ft of torque, iconic front and back end, and chrome-accented interior, complete with four-gauge instrument panel. Check out the full release and more official pictures after the jump.
Dodge 2006 Challenger Concept Flexes Some Muscle
Bold concept is a thoroughbred in 1970 "Pony
Car" Tradition
In creating the new Dodge Challenger concept car the designers at Chrysler Group's West Coast Pacifica Studio knew they had a rich heritage to draw upon.
They also knew they had an obligation to "get it right."
Tasked with the enviable assignment of developing a hot-looking performance coupe using Chrysler Group's advanced rear-wheel drive LX platform and its fabled HEMI(r) engine, the designers explored a variety of options, eventually gravitating to "something" for the Dodge brand-- appropriate given that brand's bold performance image. The idea of reinventing the highly-collectible Challenger quickly came to mind.
Eager to begin, the designers drew up a "short list "of the essential attributes of a muscle car: distinctly American; mega horsepower; pure, minimal, signature lines; aggressive air-grabbing grille; and bold colors and graphics.
"Challenger draws upon the initial 1970 model as the icon of the series," said Tom Tremont, Vice President- Advanced Vehicle Design. "The 1970 model is the most sought after by collectors. But instead of merely recreating that car, the designers endeavored to build a Challenger most people see in their mind's eye—a vehicle without the imperfections like the old car's tucked-under wheels, long front overhang and imperfect fits. As with all pleasurable memories, you remember the good and screen out the bad.
"We wanted the concept car to evoke all those sweet memories…everything you thought the Challenger was, and more."
"During the development of the concept car," says Micheal Castiglione, principal exterior designer, "we brought an actual 1970 Challenger into the studio. For me, that car symbolizes the most passionate era of automotive design."
Being key to the image, getting the right proportions was critical. The Challenger concept sits on a 116-inch wheelbase, 6-inches longer than the original. But its width is 2-inches greater, giving the concept car a squat, tougher, more purposeful persona.
The signature side view accent line – designers call it the "thrust" line—is higher up on the body, running horizontal through the fender and door and kicking up just forward of the rear wheel.
In section the upper and lower body surfaces intersect and fall away along this line, which has just a whisper of the original car's coved surfacing.
"We wanted to stay pure," said Castiglione, "with simple, minimal line work, but with everything just right."
The five-spoke chrome wheels-- 20-inch, front; 21-inch, rear—are set flush with the bodyside, giving the car the powerful muscular stance of a prizefighter eager to challenge the world. Wheel openings are drawn tightly against the tires, with the rearward edges trailing off. To emphasize the iconic muscularity, the designers added plan view "hip" to the rear quarters.
One of the key characteristics of the original car the designers
wanted to retain was the exceptionally wide look of both the front and back ends. To achieve this the designers
increased both the front and rear tracks to 64 and 65 inches respectively, wider than the LX, wider even than the 1970
model. To realize the long horizontal hood the designers deemed essential, the front overhang was also increased.
Both the hood and the deck lid of the Challenger concept vehicle are higher than the 1970 in order to lift and
"present" the front and rear themes. The front end features the signature Dodge crossbar grille and four
headlamps deeply recessed into the iconic car-wide horizontal cavity. Diagonally staggered in plan view, the outboard
lamps are set forward, the "six-shooter" inboard lamps slightly rearward. At the rear, the car-wide cavity
motif is repeated, encompassing a full-width neon-lit taillamp. Both the grille and the front and rear lamps are set
into carbon-fiber surrounds. Like the original, slim rectangular side marker lamps define the ends of the
car.
Bumpers are clean (no guards), body-color and flush with the body. "This is something we would have loved to do on the original Challenger," said Jeff Godshall, who was a young designer in the Dodge Exterior studio when the first Challenger was created, "but the technology just wasn't there. With the Challenger concept, however, the Pacifica Studio designers are able to realize what we wanted in our perfect world."
The hood reprises the original Challenger "performance hood" and its twin diagonal scoops, now with functional butterfly-valve intakes. Designed to showcase the modern techniques used in fabricating the car, what look like painted racing stripes are actually the exposed carbon fiber of the hood material.
The Challenger concept is a genuine four-passenger car—"You can sit up in the back seat," said Castiglione. Compared to the original, the greenhouse is longer, the windshield and backlite faster, and the side glass narrower. All glass is set flush with the body without moldings, another touch the original designers could only wish for. The car is a genuine two-door hardtop—no B-pillar-- with the belt line ramping up assertively at the quarter window just forward of the wide C-pillar.
Exterior details one might expect, like a racing-type gas cap, hood tie-down pins, louvered backlite and bold bodyside striping, didn't make the "cut," the designers feeling such assorted bits would detract from the purity of the monochromatic body form. But tucked reassuringly under the rear bumper are the "gotta have" twin-rectangle pipes of the dual exhausts.
In contrast to the bright Orange Pearl exterior, the interior is a no-nonsense, let's-get-in-and-go black relieved by satin silver accents and narrow orange bands on the seat backs. "Though the 1970 model was looked to for inspiration, we wanted to capture the memory of that car, but expressed in more contemporary surfaces, materials and textures," said Alan Barrington, principal interior designer. As with the original car, the instrumental panel pad sits high, intersected on the driver's side by a sculpted trapezoidal cluster containing three circular in-line analog gauge openings.
"We designed the in-your-face gauge holes to appear as if you are looking down into the engine cylinders with the head off," relates Barrington. These are flanked outboard by a larger circular "gauge" that is actually a computer, allowing the driver to determine top overall speed, quarter-mile time and speed, and top speed for each of the gears.
With its thick, easy-grip rim, circular hub and pierced silver spokes, the leather-wrapped steering wheel evokes the original car's "Tuff" wheel, as does the steering column "ribbing." The floor console, its center surface tipped toward the driver, is fitted with a proper "pistol grip" shifter shaped just right to master the quick, crisp shifts possible with the six-speed manual "tranny."
Inasmuch as the original Challenger was the first
car to have injection-molded door trim panels (now common practice), the doors received special attention.
"We imagined that the door panel was a billet of aluminum covered with a dark rubberized material,"
Barrington relates. "Then we cut into it to create a silver trapezoidal cove for the
armrest."
Although the flat-section bucket seats of the original Challenger didn't offer much support for aggressive driving, the front seats in the Challenger concept car boast hefty bolsters much like those found on Dodge's famed SRT series cars. The trim covers' horizontal pleats or "fales" provide just a hint of that "70's" look.
Rethought, reworked, reproportioned and redesigned, the Challenger concept car offers iconic a HEMI-powered performance coupe derived from a classic American muscle car.
Specifications:
Length: 197.8" (5025 mm)
Wheelbase: 116.0" (2945mm)
Front Overhang: 38.9" (989mm)
Width: 78.6" (1997mm)
Height: 57.0" (1449mm)
Track, Frt/Rr: 64.0"/65.1"
Couple: 31.5" (800mm)
Color:
Exterior: Challenger Orange
Interior: Black
Key Performance Attributes
0-60 mph: 4.5 seconds
60-0
ft: 133 ft.
Standing ¼ mile: 13
seconds
Top Speed: 174mph
Range: 300 miles
Powertrain and Suspension:
Engine: 6.1L Hemi (425hp@600rpm/420ft.-lbs@480rpm)
Drivetrain: RWD/ 6-speed-manual
Suspension: Short/long-arm Independent
Front Tire Size:
P255/40R20
Wheel Size: 20"X 9"
Outer Diameter: 29.76" (777mm)
Rear Tire
Size: P265/45R21
Wheel Size: 21"X 10"
Outer Diameter: 29.76" (756mm)












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Dodge Challenger 7:28PM (1/08/2006)
It is nice to see some official specs released even tho they dont really tell us anything about the final version of the vehicle.
If you are interested in the Dodge Challenger Concept, please visit:
http://www.challengertalk.com
Reply
blindToReality 9:41AM (1/09/2006)
Sweeeeeet. Except for the tail lights.
Reply
kwyten 2:30PM (1/09/2006)
I just saw my next car! I like it very much. I hope they don't stray too far from this design. I'll take it like it is. Good job fellas.
Reply
Charles Crow 3:11PM (1/09/2006)
I had one of the original 1970's. Wish I still did !! I really like that the the Retro look is fairly true to the 70. (Not like the new Charger's disappointing design). I only hope that the Challenger makes it to production and retains most of the concept cars' great looks. I'll be in line at my dealer.
Reply
fantome2 3:27PM (1/09/2006)
A near miss. I realize that cars just aren't as big as they once were, but it looks like a Challenger that shrank and melted around the edges. I also don't like the poor-visibility low windows that Chrysler seems to be enamored with these days.
Very nice effort, but it lacks the crispness and proportions of the original.
Reply
Brandon 11:23PM (1/09/2006)
Aside from the headlights, grill, and seats that look too comfortable for a guy like me... I like it a lot. It looks so much better than the Camaro. It lacks all of those hard edges and assorted crap the Camaro concept has. Those taillights and exhaust tips... beautiful.
Reply
Jim Wright 12:27AM (1/10/2006)
Well Guys...in 1969 I was 12yrs old just a kid.The frist car I drove was a 69 Dodge Super Bee.I was so lucky to have that in my life and the thoughts I have back then.My mothers friends drove 69 Roadrunners,69 440 GTX,69DartGSS 383,and some guy in a 68 SS 426 Hemi Dart that from what am thinking was un beaten.As time when by I got the car...69 super bee....the car wt in way to much like 3500lbs it was a tank!!The SS Dart was wt in like 2500lbs so wt means alot! Am sure Dodge knows about wt.Dodge was not in NASCAR for yr because of the HEMI and the Daytons was so unbeaten and later band from NASCAR only a few times by the Fords.If you look up 1968 SS Dodge Dart online you will be inpress the car still holds many records in NHRA today oh....well funnycar as well but they they dont run a Ford motor in them or Chevy oh wait.. top fuel.. no Ford or Chevys motors too......am thinking why ...hahaha
If Dodge would only put a big block back in like a N 426 Hemi that they still make and sell anyday...on you can buy one by walking into Dodge today,then maybe it wouldnt be so bad pulling up to a light with your wife in the car and a 2009 Vette is there just waiting!! Only in a Mopars dreams would that happen for $32,000 ok $36,000 with the big block adden in the cost!
Oh buy the way I once own a 67 Doge R/T 440 Red with white in side ,1969 Dodge Dart Swing with a 440 in it,71 Challenger 304 cov.with a staker hood ,and a 69 440 Six Pack Super Bee that I had have for the last 25 yrs......yes I look back at those days when my mother beat that car that was name after a horse and that night she ran a 69 SS 396...maybe because the guy couldnt drive....hahaha yes lose some wt.Dodge Boys or the Dodge Boys will be getting a black eye !!
As far as the car's looks ....great ...they couldnt done any better,am going to be one of the frist to buy one.For the new Charger if someone gave me one I would give it to the littie old woman next door because it looks like the car she would buy!!
Six Pack Jim yahoo id letsridehwy1
Reply
Howard H. 3:23PM (1/10/2006)
Looks great on the outside. The interior is rather cheap looking. I was 6 years old when the 70 E bodies came out. The 70 challenger with the 440 6 pack is my favorite muscle car ever made. Make mine plum crazy with white R/T stripe.
Reply
Abe Randolph 8:34PM (1/10/2006)
To Daimler Chrysler:PERFECT! Build it exactly like this and sell a ton of them cheap -- or I'll come get you.
Reply
Ron White 11:13PM (1/10/2006)
Oh yes I will be right down to get this car frist thing when they come out!!! Way to go Dodge best looking car I have seen in years. Shure hope they keep them looking the same when they do start to sell them.
Inside and out this car is what I have been looking for. Was looking at the Charger to buy and wow then I seen the Challenger it's the one for me. Dodge boys are back in town
Reply
Stan S 4:12AM (1/11/2006)
Great, but not perfect. I'll agree with the gent who said it looks slightly "melted", perhaps 2-3" more front overhang would do. I was always a 'Cuda fan, so long and low is more to my liking anyway.
Drop the tailight - visions of Merc Cougars are dancing thru my head.
20" and 21" - Kick these to the curb as well. The originals ran on 14"! Now I'm not suggesting reverting, but I think 17-18" would be appropriate.
Interior - Drop the cheesey gauges (see Mustang for inspiration). Otherwise, looks good to me (the originals were typically spartan)
Oh yeah, Curious Yellow and sign me up anyway please!
Reply
S. Kruithoff 12:20PM (1/11/2006)
425 horses. 6.1 L Hemi..In 2009, I'm seeimg atleast 40 K price tag at 4.00 per gallon. Love the lines and cropped looking lid..Separate taillights would be in order. Make mine that orange on the concept..or bad ass black.
Reply
xr-thumper 5:23PM (1/11/2006)
Drop the tail lights and go with the later design and you got a smash hit!!!!
Reply
Scott 3:15PM (1/12/2006)
Well if they don't change much to the car, there will be one in my drive.....
Reply
Shane 4:02PM (1/12/2006)
Mmmmmmm...Hemi :)
Just getting anywhere close to the original is tight, tight, tight! Look what happened to the Nova...and Impala...and... :(
Reply
j.stein 9:05PM (1/12/2006)
i like the body lines in the front of the car but the the rear needs attention split the taillights and that would look cool as for the interior it looks like it came out of a arcade game needs some work curious though what size rear-end gears that would be offered and color options? one thing that would set it off would be a rear spoiler!
Reply
phil 9:24PM (1/12/2006)
So close, yet so far away. What would actually happen if they built one at 3,100 lbs rather than the current 4,100? Less HP needed for a 13 second car that's what. Lose that cheeze looking instrument package as well.
I also had a 69 Dart with a stock 340 which ran a flat 13 seconds on a 355 posi rear. Car was all top end speed but had a quick hole shot with some trick suspension I added. But was no where near 4 thousand, even 3 thousand pounds!!
I love the idea and would buy one if they would stop trying to compromise luxury with muscle.
Just give us pure muscle without the steroids please.
What a concept, eh?
Reply
kpogoda 4:19PM (1/13/2006)
The Camaro looks like an exact duplicate of the Cadillac XLR. The pointy nose does not appear to look right.
Reply
fantome2 8:45PM (1/13/2006)
Ditto on the chessiness of the tail lights and the interior, and a couple of extra inches on the front would make it really close to primo.
Oh, and make the shift lever a little knobbier. It's a bad angle for a joystick.
Reply
steven devine 1:46AM (1/14/2006)
YES!!!I finally have a reason to live!To bad it's going to take my whole life span to come up with the money to buy it.
If dodge was smart they'd put it in the price range of the mustang,but with 425 horses,that doesn't seem possible. If it is in the range I'll sell my cobra so quick your head will spin!
Reply