Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
BREAKING: GM and Chrysler talking about merger
Spy Shots: Nissan 370Z again, with interior shots
2010 Mazda3 unveiled ahead of LA Auto Show
Spy Shots: Nissan 370Z caught undisguised
GM on Corvette ZR1 cancellation rumor: "Not true."
Knight Rider: The Liveblog -- Season 1, Episode 3
In the Autoblog Garage: 2009 Mazda RX-8 R3, return of the "hummer"
In the Autoblog Garage: 2008 Chevy Corvette Z06
Autoline on Autoblog with John McElroy
Paris 2008: Le Day 1 Wrapup
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this threadGMC Pad wins California Design Challenge
(Page 1 of 1)
Lithous @ Jan 5th 2006 9:22PM
"Point is... FLOPS have nothing to do with storage"
Exactly my point. I was assuming the " of onboard memory" was correct but the flops part was wrong and you seem to assume the flops part was correct and the " of onboard memory" was a mistake or something.
When I saw the word "memory" I stated RAM and I stated that we all know of 1 gigabytes of RAM therefore the sentence should state " terabyte of onboard memory".
But if you took 4 250GB hard drives (or a thumb drive) would they be considered "onboard MEMORY"? I have never thought of hard drives as memory, of course, unless you are talking about Virtual Memory and file paging.