<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/01/04/dodge-challenger-concept-photo-gallery/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/01/04/dodge-challenger-concept-photo-gallery/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/01/04/dodge-challenger-concept-photo-gallery/</guid><description><![CDATA[so am I the only one out there who thinks this is a completely uninspired and downright disappointing design?  its like remaking king kong, whats the point, how about something original?<br><br><br><br>hopefully the retro inspired fog that has been hanging over the world's major design centers for the last decade will clear after 2006 (the new Beetle is responsible for all of this crap).  it's the 21st century, auto designers should be pushing things forward, not vaguely redesigning classic cars with a slightly modern clean twist.  lame.<br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Z]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 4th 2006 11:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/01/04/dodge-challenger-concept-photo-gallery/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/01/04/dodge-challenger-concept-photo-gallery/</guid><description><![CDATA[The problem is that car manufacturers have produced such boring designs, that by default, the Challenger looks Great!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Marcelo Sarabia]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 24th 2007 3:53AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/01/04/dodge-challenger-concept-photo-gallery/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/01/04/dodge-challenger-concept-photo-gallery/</guid><description><![CDATA[I bought a 74 Dodge Challenger, small engine, new. I've had it all these years. Let me be frank, I have had people wave to me while driving, in parking lots, at traffic lights, asking to buy it. They are serious. 33 years later, it's still awesome. It is more exciting now then then. And, in looks good in any color. I feel like I'm in my 20s again, and that bodes well for me. It's a great car and always has been. It should sell well, but I'm keeping my classic another 20 years. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Nov 2nd 2007 5:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/01/04/dodge-challenger-concept-photo-gallery/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/01/04/dodge-challenger-concept-photo-gallery/</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually you can go back further to that, to say cars I'm not positive but I believe the Ford Thunderbird was before the beetle, the PT Cruiser and HHR is a homage to cars from the '30s and '40s and you can even go back as '94-'96 when Chevrolet brought back the Impala SS based on the Chevrolet Caprice with the LT1 5.7 litre tuned port injection Corvette engine so cars have been leapfrogging this retro thing for quite some time, and I personally think these cars are incredible.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 13th 2007 8:21PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>