Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.













Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this thread(Page 1 of 1)
Austin @ Jul 20th 2007 10:32AM
Well in 1969 I was -11, as in I hadn't been born yet. However, I loved the classic cars and ended up rebuilding one myself. 69 mustang mach 1. Anyway, I really like the new styles that pay hommage to the classics. How could someone not like that much power on demand when desired and have decent mpg when it's not? I'm looking forward to the companies trying to top each other in this little competition...as long as it doesn't bring the let down of the later 70's and 80's again. 2Suave, reading your comment was like listening to someone complain about classic works of art. You apparently didn't get it then, and you don't get it now.