2006 Ford Fusion I4 Manual: In the Autoblog Garage Day 3-4
We've spent the entire week with the 2006 Ford Fusion I4 Manual and we've come away with the same impression as we did with its V6 sibling. The Fusion with either powerplant is a family car with a heaping helping of fun thrown on its plate, like peas and carrots with a side of cookie dough ice cream. With this model the lack of power (160 hp vs. 220 hp) is somewhat offset by the fact you get to row your own gears, but is the top of the line SEL with a four-cylinder powerplant a smart choice? Let's see…
First lets talk about how the I4 coupled with its 5-speed manual performed. As mentioned, the fact that the power
of gear selection is left to your own mental faculties instead of the cars onboard computer makes driving more fun in
any car. Manual gear selection is a skill in which one can take pride, almost a dying art in this day and age, so the
fact the I4 can be had with a standard shift while the V6 model cannot is a big plus. At some point in the near future
the four-cylinder model will also get the choice of a 5-speed automatic, although its listed on Fords website as
late availability.
While a sense of speed is present in this version of the Fusion, the actual speed really isnt. Many times I caught
myself at a light feeling like I had gotten the jump on my pretend competitor in the next lane, only to have him in his
Impala effortlessly pull away. The 2.3L four-cylinder is backed by 156 lb-ft. of torque, which is spread as thin as
butter on toast across the power band. The I4 Fusion SEL is, however, 179 lbs. lighter than the V6 SEL, which was not
lost on us as we chucked the car through some corners and on ramps. Again, despite the four-cylinder being down on
power the cars excellent chassis and lower weight contribute to a decent sense of speed. All of which is to say that
this model is just as fun to drive as the V6 SEL, but in a totally different way.
After spending some time with the I4 SEL we couldnt help but regret that we hadnt snagged a base I4 S model. Nearly
everything about the two SEL models is
identical except for the engine and transmission. The suspension, wheels and brakes are all the same here as on the
version we already reviewed. Both models weve driven were also optioned to the hilt, which ballooned their prices into
a range well above $20K. Our I4 SEL that came with the optional Safety and Security package ($595), SEL Premium package
($395), heated front seats ($295), anti-lock brakes ($595), leather seating ($895) and Audiophile sound system ($420)
stickered at $22,180. Thats more money than the V6 SELs base price ($21,710). Jettison all the options on the SEL I4
and you get its base price, a much more palatable $18,985. Were guessing that a loaded SEL I4 like our tester will be
the least sold Fusion, with more models being sold at the higher end with a V6 and lower end with few options.
Of course, there may be those out there who see the Fusion SEL I4s combination of above average handling, convincing
sense of speed and better gas mileage as reason enough to choose it over the V6 model. The two cars both do well on the
EPA mileage cycle, however, with the I4 returning 23 city/31 highway and the V6 returning 21 city/29 highway. If youre
like us, chances are youll be enjoying the manual transmission in this family sedan way too much to ever hit the I4s
mileage numbers, though.
What wed really like to know is whether the base Fusion I4 S is really a bargain at $17,795 or a stripped-to-the-bone
version of the two sedans weve already driven. As for this tale of two SELs, we can say that in the end theyre about
even in our book. You get more power and a slick tranny in the V6 model but less weight and a chance to row your own
boat with the I4. You can pick your poison and wouldnt go wrong with either, although wed still probably opt for the
V6 version because its larger displacement makes for a less labored engine under the hood. Part of the I4s sense of
speed can be traced directly back to the more hurried and raucous sound of all four pots pumping wildly in front of
you.
Well close the book on the Fusion for now and wait patiently with our hands folded for a future date with another
relative the Lincoln Zephyr and the arrival of Fords new
250-hp, 3.5L V6. Then were going to have to do this all
over again. Sheesh.












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Source1 11:07PM (12/18/2005)
Why didn't u compare the Fusion and the Sonata head-to-head when u had them both in your yard? Guys, head-to-heads might spice up the site and make things a little more interesting. Change=Growth
Reply
Chris 11:07PM (12/18/2005)
Hopefull by the time Ford drops in that 3.5L they will be offering AWD (emphasis on the RWD part) and maybe a six speed manual. Only then will this be a serious family sedan.
Are you listening Ford? We're yearning for a RWD sedan that won't demand our first born in trade.
Reply
Bernie 11:07PM (12/18/2005)
The front end treatment reminds me why Ford let their whole design staff go a few years ago. The piles of snow in the background reminds me why I moved south about the same time. Airbrush a little mud spary onto those same mounds and you can see what Michigan looks like in March!
Reply
Swanny 11:07PM (12/18/2005)
More Fusion info at http://www.FordFusion.net
Reply
Jay Condrick 11:07PM (12/18/2005)
I like the idea of trying both ends of the spectrum and urge you to push for that going forward....I've often wondered how the base model would stack up to the heavily optioned cars that the press usually drives.
I enjoy your blog.
Reply
Jiggabyte 11:07PM (12/18/2005)
"Only then will this be a serious family sedan"
Add to that: STANDARD "SAFETY & SECURITY PACKAGE".
Optional safety features? What is this, 1935? Get real, Ford... Even Hyundai has ABS, stability control, and curtain airbags STANDARD.
Reply
2Suave 11:07PM (12/18/2005)
Why should anyone buy a Fusion over a Camry or Accord which have known, excellent service records?
Why should anyone buy a Fusion over a Mazda 6 which is the car on which the Fusion is based and is consummate with respect to chassis dynamics?
Reply
Jason in Boston 11:07PM (12/18/2005)
Jiggabyte => Very dramatic post to quote back to 1935, funny! But you only have to go back to 2004 DX and LX Accords to see side airbags as an "option" only feature. And, the protection of curtains was only available in the EX. I think your point is good, but Ford isn't so out of step as you harp on. The base price of the car is what they're trying to bring to the lowest point as a marketing trick. When you add on the cost of the airbags, the cars price competitively, actually Ford still has the edge. Conversely, do Honda and Toyota, allow you a rebate to NOT have side airbags? I know it's silly to consider, but there is no good argument here about Ford having lesser features...add the side airbags and have it rolled into the price just as Honda and Toyota have been doing for only 2 years.
Reply