Autoblog

Hmmm... rampant speculation time...

So, should Ford release an SVT version, would it be powered by a tuned version of the anticipated 3.5 litre v6, Mazda's 270 HP turbo 2.3, or would they go so far as to make a performance hybrid version (3.0 litre or 3.5 litre with electric motor a-la accord hybrid)?

The 3.5 v6 would help show off the new motor, but if it was only offered in the SVT all those people who think that bigger engines are absolutely necessary for "highway safety" will get in a huff...

The Mazda Motor would be lighter, but I'm not sure if Ford's relationship with mazda is that good or how many people would be able to resist going "we HAVE a mazdaspeed6 already!"

Having a performance hybrid Fusion would be really cool, if it was an SVT it would probably get more recognition than the Accord hybrid, which no-one really thinks of as "sporty". Unfortunately, I think Ford is scared of putting hybrids into cars when there are so many SUV's begging to be made more efficient

Reply

↓↑report

Why should anyone be ashamed? Is that a prejudice coming through? I never wore out so many tires so fast as when I owned one; it cut the corners like a knife. What a blast, and the Fusion would be a great SVT car, I'm sure.

Reply

↓↑report

I can understand Ford's position- creating a performance model as sales slow. But we want our hotrods NOW!

DC seems to be able to create SRT models along side the standard vehicles. Why not Ford?

In other news- I found a nice looking Contour SVT cheap at the local Ford dealer.

Reply

↓↑report

My '98 SVT Contour with 115k miles has been a great car. I bought it new, and it has been dependable and a blast to drive. Unfortunately, the SVTC was a victim of poor marketing, and the fact that the general public (read:ignorant) couldn't see paying a $3k premium for one. Oh, and the resale value SUCKS, but it has seemed to level out in the past few years. The last years of production seemed to be plauged with cost cutting and quality problems though. The '98, '98.5 and '99 seemed to be the best models.

Reply

↓↑report

If they're pushing off a Fusion SVT, how about at least offering an honest I-prefer-three-pedals manual transmission with the V6...

Reply

↓↑report

I think Ford's thinking is ass-backwards. When sales dip, sure it would be nice to get a boost from a performance model and corrosponding halo, but wouldn't it better to get the boost and the halo to begin with? By all accounts, the Fusion is a fine car and is selling well. But it's in a niche, and that niche is not performance. Why not change the perception of the Fusion right out of the gate? They tried to do that a bit by having the tuner cars at SEMA, but why pitch what you can't sell? They ought to have an SVT version as soon as they can, even if it's only a couple hundred units to broaden the appeal and increase the perception that the Fusion is a nice, small family car, but is also fun to drive and can be tricked out for more performance.

Reply

↓↑report

Don't expect me to add Ford to my shopping list, any time soon, either. Thanks Ford!

Reply

↓↑report

As a Ford fan, who already has a 2005 Mustang, and wanted to get a daily driver -- it pains me to say it, but Ford has lost a sale. While I love the Fusion, I want the best performance for my money and with no SVT in the lineup, I have to somewhere else.

Reply

↓↑report

I still think my '98 Contour SVT was the best all around car I've ever owned, and I say that driving a BMW 330i right now. One of the reasons I drive a 330i is that FORD DIDN'T HAVE AN SVT CONTOUR REPLACEMENT WHEN I WAS READY TO SELL!!!

Headlines like this drive me nuts. When is Ford going to learn? If someone is going to shell out 4-5 grand more for the performance version of a model, are they more likely to do it when the model is new and hot, or when it's got several years on a design? Sigh... Ford should be redesigning the entire Fusion "a few years off," not introducing tarted up variants.

DC has the right idea with the SRT and AMG approach... Have 'em available at launch. Ford is just sooo lost.

Interestingly, BMW still is doing staggered rollouts on the M-line, which I think it going to be a mistake soon. The M3 is still about 2 years out. That gives the MB AMG's and Audi S's and RS's a looong time on the market to rack up sales!

Reply

↓↑report

Personally I'd rather see a SVT Freestyle (waits for hell to freeze over), but that's because I could never own anything as impractical and boring as a sedan.

Reply

↓↑report

And the Freestyle isn't boring??

And when did sedans become impractical?

Reply

↓↑report

Gee, I wish Ford would offer some performance models - in the Focus and in the Fusion, which are naturals. Even if it isn't as "extreme" as an SVT, it would be nice to have a model a little more oriented towards enthusiast drivers. Both Chevy and DMC are doing their part - Chevy has SS trim lines in Cobalt, Malibu, and Impala model lines (and the Cobalt SS without the supercharger seems to hit a sweet spot), and DMC has the SRT4, will have the Caliber R/T, and has the whole Hemi thing in their 300/Magnum/Charger models.

I agree that rather than resting on initial market acceptance, they need a "halo" model.

Reply

↓↑report

If an SVT Fusion is years out, then WHAT IS SVT DOING in the meantime? Development work on the Shelby Mustang Cobra is done, the Lightning replacement is was supposedly canceled... Is the Sport Trac Adrenalin all they have coming?

Reply

↓↑report

Look for an "ST" version next year maybe mid-model year (like the ST Focus).

I think they want to make sure the first year or so of the model is launched successfully.

Reply

↓↑report