<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com/2005/03/28/suzuki-concept-x2/</link>
<description>Autoblog Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2005/03/28/suzuki-concept-x2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2005/03/28/suzuki-concept-x2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Give us a break.  It's a Equinox.  It's not even convincingly restyled, like the Equinox vs. the Vue.  Power is "estimated" at 185, eh?  Is it also "estimated" to come from a Chinese built Chevy pushrod V6?  Wouldn't that be a freakin' coincedence!<br><br>That said, it looks better than the Equinox without that silly "me-too" chrome bar, and I've always been a fan of the rear mounted spare if for no other reason than to open up extra storage space.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve B.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 18th 2005 10:31PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>