Add your comments
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
New KITT Attack Mode revealed at Comic Con
London 2008: Honda OSM concept roadster says, "Cheerio!"
London 2008: Lotus unveils the Evora
2010 Chevy Camaro - Official Details and Images
2010 Chevy Camaro - LIVE from the reveal
In the Autoblog Garage: Aprilia RSV 1000 R
First Drive: Maserati Quattroporte S in Europe
First Drive: 2008 MINI Cooper S JCW
In the Autoblog Garage:2009 Nissan GT-R
North American Exclusive First Drive: Alfa MiTo
Reader Comments for
Subscribe to this threadLutz's choice: Kill Pontiac or Buick?
(Page 1 of 1)
KIVERS @ Dec 18th 2005 10:59PM
In my very non-expert opinion, GM needs to kills off more than one division. The only way to keep that many seperate divisions is to have a variety of product spread among them. Taking one product and re-badging it to 3 other brands does nothing but cheapin the product. If I buy a Cadillac I want a Cadillac, not a Chevy with a nice interior. If I buy a pontiac, give me a pontiac, not a Chevy and a Saturn. I really think that some of GM's new cars are really nice, but the re-badging just cheapens it.